No, I actually said there is no support for it. I do not support it.That sounds a lot like you clinging to "legalistic treaties and process".
I mean, your only objection here is that it would be too complicated to change and an assertion of "virtually no support" without any data to back that up.
And yes, amending the Constitution is a formal "legalistic process". You and I can't really deny that. Trump or his supporters can talk about a third-term to their heart's content and it won't make a bit of a difference.
Did the election cause you to have dysphoria or are you someone borrowing Valcazar's handle for awhile?