A certain irrationality exists in this belief. If one has the view you describe, there is no room for reflection or analysis in the debate. It takes on the shape of political creed.So Democrats are innocent of all and every accusation?
and
Republicans are guilty of all and every accusation?
Very interesting concept
Wouldn't a Court and Judge make sentencing determinations?.In other words then it is okay for him to be "above the law"!!
Accusations are one thing. Convictions before a jury of your peers is entirely different.So Democrats are innocent of all and every accusation?
and
Republicans are guilty of all and every accusation?
Very interesting concept
The European union was pushing Biden to do exactly the same. They wanted this prosecutor fired for the same reason Biden did - this dude would not go after corruption.Title:
Fact check: Biden leveraged $1B in aid to Ukraine to oust corrupt prosecutor, not to help his son
Biden was so fckn concerned about a Ukrainian corrupt prosecutor that he decided to withhold 1 BILLION dollars? Give me a break. What kool aid are you drinking?
Hopefully we're about to see another former president facing felonies....
Comer had 2 years to find corruption in Biden. He found nothing except his dumb-ass was played by a Russian agent.
That doesn't require constitutional expertise.I just want to say we are all very lucky to have an esteemed U.S. Constitutional legal expert such as yourself on the forum.
They've been quite explicit about their corruption and their intent to have lots of it.This has been so diminished over the past 8 years. I work all over the world. I see how corrupt 3rd world countries work. That's exactly where USA is going.
"The violent ones won't be pardoned" was the fake reasonable position people were trying to take because just releasing everyone made some people uncomfortable.JD vance lied that The Jan 6th Violent Insurrectionists should not be pardoned:
JD Vance says violent Jan. 6 rioters shouldn't receive pardons
Vice President-elect JD Vance said Sunday who he thinks should and shouldn’t receive presidential pardons for their actions during the riot at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.www.nbcwashington.com
Tell that to the left here on TerbA certain irrationality exists in this belief. If one has the view you describe, there is no room for reflection or analysis in the debate. It takes on the shape of political creed.
Yes a Court decision was made in 1898.That doesn't require constitutional expertise.
It's just a fact that the decision was made already.
Now, this Supreme Court has shown it is perfectly happy to overturn previous decisions, but that doesn't change the fact that a decision was made.
I was directing my comment to them. This partisan view that Republican politicians are the only ones to ever be guilty of corruption or other crimes is a certain type of absurdity.Tell that to the left here on Terb
I stand corrected my apologies.I was directing my comment to them. This partisan view that Republican politicians are the only ones to ever be guilty of corruption or other crimes is a certain type of absurdity.
Yes, and I am surprised to see you stretching to find reasons to try and push for its overturning that have plausible cover and deniability.Yes a Court decision was made in 1898.
I'm not pushing for anything. Let the Supreme Court decide. They will decide if mothers who enter the country illegally can guarantee citizenship for their children.Yes, and I am surprised to see you stretching to find reasons to try and push for its overturning that have plausible cover and deniability.
You're usually much more straightforward.
If you think it is bad and the constitutional interpretation should be changed, just say so, don't hem and haw with pretending to not know if it has really been decided or what not.
Just say that you think people disagree now and so the rule should be changed and interpreted a new way.