People talk as if there were no christian rape gangs ...
Muslim Rape Gangs Targeted Tens of 1000s of Poor White Girls as Authorities Ran Cover
- Thread starter GameBoy27
- Start date
You can start here with Andrew Norfolk. It think him winning journalism awards should suffice your need for 'reliability'.
Andrew Norfolk - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
The fact that you guys are not in full knowledge of the Rotherham scandal makes me question why you are speaking on this.
You can start here with Andrew Norfolk. It think him winning journalism awards should suffice your need for 'reliability'.
Andrew Norfolk - Wikipedia
The fact that you guys are not in full knowledge of the Rotherham scandal makes me question why you are speaking on this.
Rotherham child sexual exploitation scandal - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
This actually deals with the issue.
A group of clannish assholes were running the town and the police force through an old boys network and ignored the issue of group rape until it blew up. There were a series of trials about 10 years ago with long sentences handed out.
It's all a disgrace. But attempts to revive the issue 10 years later with an anti Muslim racist message and a rant that the "establishment" protects Muslim criminals is simpy milking and distorting the original situation for political gain.
This is the guy that criticized Elon Musk
www.thesun.co.uk
Ex-Labour MP arrested 'after trying to meet boy, 15, in live-stream'
FORMER Labour minister Ivor Caplin was arrested today after he was filmed allegedly trying to meet with a 15-year-old child he met online. The ex-Hove MP was stopped at his local train station by a…
www.thesun.co.uk
Labour MP Breaks Ranks with PM Starmer to Demand Inquiry Into Child Rape Grooming Gangs
A Labour Party MP has broken ranks with Prime Minister Sir Kier Starmer to demand a national public inquiry into the child rape grooming gang scandal, arguing that the substantial public interest is not merely a fixation of the so-called “far-right”.
This week, Prime Minister Starmer ordered his party to vote down a motion from Tory leader Kemi Badenoch to establish a public inquiry into Muslim child rape gangs and the failures of police, politicians, and other local officials to protect young girls in Britain. This came after Minister for Safeguarding and Violence Against Women and Girls Jess Phillips shot down a local inquiry into grooming gangs in Oldham.
Despite Labour overwhelmingly voting down a national inquiry, cracks appear to be emerging, with Liverpool Walton MP Dan Carden becoming the first parliamentarian to break from the prime minister, saying that the “public call for justice must be heeded”.
Carden, who abstained from the inquiry vote, told the Liverpool Echo: “The British public want action and justice on the unspeakable rape gangs. The scale of the crimes committed – rape, murder, torture – are horrific.
“It is shocking that people in positions of power could have covered up and refused to act to avoid confronting racial or cultural issues or because victims were poor and working class.”
The Labour MP went on to say that the country must “question and challenge the orthodoxy of progressive liberal multiculturalism that led to authorities failing to act,” arguing that a “new doctrine to take our multi-ethnic society into the future” is needed.
“The outcome must include acknowledging the racial and ethnic hatred of this mass sexual violence. This is not an obsession of the far-right. I am speaking out because over the decades there have been far too few Labour voices expressing clear disgust and outrage at these heinous crimes, their cover-up and the lack of action,” Carden said.
While Carden represents the first defection of a Labour MP on the issue, he is not alone in the party demanding that the government launch an inquiry.
This week, the influential Labour Party mayor of Greater Manchester, Andy Burnham, made a similar call, arguing that previous local inquiries into grooming gangs did not have the same legal powers as national inquiries.
Public sentiment also appears to be firmly against the left-wing government. A YouGov survey this week found that 76 per cent of Britons support a national inquiry, compared to just 13 per cent who oppose it.
Separately, a poll from More in Common of over 2,000 people found that 41 per cent think that the grooming scandal was intentionally covered up, The Telegraph reported.
Previous reports have found that local officials and police failed to act to protect young white girls from mostly Muslim Pakistani child rape gangs for fear of appearing racist or stoking ethnic divisions.
Responding to the defection of the Labour MP on the issue, Reform UK deputy leader Richard Tice remarked on X: ” Labour MP breaks ranks and demands child rape gang inquiry. Same day as former Labour MP arrested for alleged child sex offences. Labour on the ropes. This is unsustainable.”
Reform UK leader Nigel Farage said Saturday that if the government does not establish a national public inquiry by the end of the month, his party will fund an investigation staffed with independent arbiters to uncover abuse and government failures.
www.theguardian.com
A Labour Party MP has broken ranks with Prime Minister Sir Kier Starmer to demand a national public inquiry into the child rape grooming gang scandal, arguing that the substantial public interest is not merely a fixation of the so-called “far-right”.
This week, Prime Minister Starmer ordered his party to vote down a motion from Tory leader Kemi Badenoch to establish a public inquiry into Muslim child rape gangs and the failures of police, politicians, and other local officials to protect young girls in Britain. This came after Minister for Safeguarding and Violence Against Women and Girls Jess Phillips shot down a local inquiry into grooming gangs in Oldham.
Despite Labour overwhelmingly voting down a national inquiry, cracks appear to be emerging, with Liverpool Walton MP Dan Carden becoming the first parliamentarian to break from the prime minister, saying that the “public call for justice must be heeded”.
Carden, who abstained from the inquiry vote, told the Liverpool Echo: “The British public want action and justice on the unspeakable rape gangs. The scale of the crimes committed – rape, murder, torture – are horrific.
“It is shocking that people in positions of power could have covered up and refused to act to avoid confronting racial or cultural issues or because victims were poor and working class.”
The Labour MP went on to say that the country must “question and challenge the orthodoxy of progressive liberal multiculturalism that led to authorities failing to act,” arguing that a “new doctrine to take our multi-ethnic society into the future” is needed.
“The outcome must include acknowledging the racial and ethnic hatred of this mass sexual violence. This is not an obsession of the far-right. I am speaking out because over the decades there have been far too few Labour voices expressing clear disgust and outrage at these heinous crimes, their cover-up and the lack of action,” Carden said.
While Carden represents the first defection of a Labour MP on the issue, he is not alone in the party demanding that the government launch an inquiry.
This week, the influential Labour Party mayor of Greater Manchester, Andy Burnham, made a similar call, arguing that previous local inquiries into grooming gangs did not have the same legal powers as national inquiries.
Public sentiment also appears to be firmly against the left-wing government. A YouGov survey this week found that 76 per cent of Britons support a national inquiry, compared to just 13 per cent who oppose it.
Separately, a poll from More in Common of over 2,000 people found that 41 per cent think that the grooming scandal was intentionally covered up, The Telegraph reported.
Previous reports have found that local officials and police failed to act to protect young white girls from mostly Muslim Pakistani child rape gangs for fear of appearing racist or stoking ethnic divisions.
Responding to the defection of the Labour MP on the issue, Reform UK deputy leader Richard Tice remarked on X: ” Labour MP breaks ranks and demands child rape gang inquiry. Same day as former Labour MP arrested for alleged child sex offences. Labour on the ropes. This is unsustainable.”
Reform UK leader Nigel Farage said Saturday that if the government does not establish a national public inquiry by the end of the month, his party will fund an investigation staffed with independent arbiters to uncover abuse and government failures.
Andy Burnham joins calls for ‘limited’ national inquiry into sexual abuse gangs
Greater Manchester mayor says scope of inquiry he commissioned in Oldham did not have same legal powers
www.theguardian.com
Musk is now hated in the UK for pushing this bullshit.
Migrant Gang Rapists Brutally Attack Woman in Dutch Park—Courts Respond with Leniency, ‘Integration’ Programs, and Slap on Wrist
The courts’ disgraceful leniency—offering mere months of detention and “guidance” for such a barbaric crime—not only fails the victim but emboldens predators, proving that justice in the Netherlands bends over backward to coddle migrant criminals at the expense of public safety.
In yet another glaring example of misplaced priorities, a Dutch court handed down lenient sentences to five migrant boys convicted in the brutal gang rape and assault of a 32-year-old homeless woman in Helmond. The horrific attack took place in a public park, where the vulnerable victim was ambushed, beaten, raped in rounds, and robbed of her belongings. Instead of delivering justice for the victim and ensuring public safety, the court prioritized “help” and “integration” for the migrant perpetrators, shielding them behind juvenile law and deliberately minimizing public scrutiny of their heinous crimes.
The Crime: A Chilling Attack in Helmond
The horrific crime occurred on December 16, 2023, in Helmond’s Burgemeester Geukerspark. The victim, a homeless and vulnerable 32-year-old woman, was sitting alone on a bench at night when the teenagers ambushed her. They surrounded her, locked her in, grabbed her under her arms, and dragged her to a grassy area where they carried out their depraved attack. She was beaten, her mouth covered to silence her screams, and raped multiple times in rounds by the attackers.
Adding to their depravity, the boys also robbed the woman of her cell phone before leaving her injured and abandoned. When police found her, she bore visible injuries, including facial bruises and swelling, and her pants were around her knees.
Prosecution and Verdict
The Public Prosecution Service (OM) prosecuted the five boys for gang rape, demanding only two years of juvenile detention, six to eight months of which would be conditional. Until the verdict was announced, the suspects remained in custody. However, the court’s sentences fell well short of these demands:
Secrecy and Leniency: Protecting the Criminals, Not the Victim
The entire case was shrouded in secrecy, with all court sessions held behind closed doors because the suspects were minors at the time of the crime. Media coverage was minimal, and police were reluctant to release details. This deliberate lack of transparency shields the attackers from public scrutiny while downplaying the severity of the crime.
The Court’s Disgraceful Priorities
The court’s decision to impose lenient sentences highlights its troubling priorities. Instead of ensuring justice for the victim and deterring future crimes, the judge focused on the perpetrators’ integration. Calling the boys “unaccompanied, minor foreigners,” the court insisted they “still need a lot of help and guidance” to function in Dutch society. As part of their sentence, they must complete an intensive guidance program through youth probation services, adding to the burden on Dutch taxpayers.
A Betrayal of Justice and Public Safety
This leniency is a slap in the face to the victim and to Dutch citizens. By prioritizing “help” for the rapists over justice for the victim, the court sends a dangerous message: violent criminals can exploit their status as “vulnerable migrants” to avoid meaningful punishment. Instead of integration programs, the response should have been swift and decisive:
nltimes.nl
The courts’ disgraceful leniency—offering mere months of detention and “guidance” for such a barbaric crime—not only fails the victim but emboldens predators, proving that justice in the Netherlands bends over backward to coddle migrant criminals at the expense of public safety.
In yet another glaring example of misplaced priorities, a Dutch court handed down lenient sentences to five migrant boys convicted in the brutal gang rape and assault of a 32-year-old homeless woman in Helmond. The horrific attack took place in a public park, where the vulnerable victim was ambushed, beaten, raped in rounds, and robbed of her belongings. Instead of delivering justice for the victim and ensuring public safety, the court prioritized “help” and “integration” for the migrant perpetrators, shielding them behind juvenile law and deliberately minimizing public scrutiny of their heinous crimes.
The Crime: A Chilling Attack in Helmond
The horrific crime occurred on December 16, 2023, in Helmond’s Burgemeester Geukerspark. The victim, a homeless and vulnerable 32-year-old woman, was sitting alone on a bench at night when the teenagers ambushed her. They surrounded her, locked her in, grabbed her under her arms, and dragged her to a grassy area where they carried out their depraved attack. She was beaten, her mouth covered to silence her screams, and raped multiple times in rounds by the attackers.
Adding to their depravity, the boys also robbed the woman of her cell phone before leaving her injured and abandoned. When police found her, she bore visible injuries, including facial bruises and swelling, and her pants were around her knees.
Prosecution and Verdict
The Public Prosecution Service (OM) prosecuted the five boys for gang rape, demanding only two years of juvenile detention, six to eight months of which would be conditional. Until the verdict was announced, the suspects remained in custody. However, the court’s sentences fell well short of these demands:
- Three suspects were sentenced to 15 months of juvenile detention, with three months suspended and a two-year probation period, for gang rape and theft of the victim’s phone.
- One suspect received 12 months of juvenile detention for gang rape.
- The fifth suspect, charged with assault rather than rape, was sentenced to four months of juvenile detention.
Secrecy and Leniency: Protecting the Criminals, Not the Victim
The entire case was shrouded in secrecy, with all court sessions held behind closed doors because the suspects were minors at the time of the crime. Media coverage was minimal, and police were reluctant to release details. This deliberate lack of transparency shields the attackers from public scrutiny while downplaying the severity of the crime.
The Court’s Disgraceful Priorities
The court’s decision to impose lenient sentences highlights its troubling priorities. Instead of ensuring justice for the victim and deterring future crimes, the judge focused on the perpetrators’ integration. Calling the boys “unaccompanied, minor foreigners,” the court insisted they “still need a lot of help and guidance” to function in Dutch society. As part of their sentence, they must complete an intensive guidance program through youth probation services, adding to the burden on Dutch taxpayers.
A Betrayal of Justice and Public Safety
This leniency is a slap in the face to the victim and to Dutch citizens. By prioritizing “help” for the rapists over justice for the victim, the court sends a dangerous message: violent criminals can exploit their status as “vulnerable migrants” to avoid meaningful punishment. Instead of integration programs, the response should have been swift and decisive:
- Deport the perpetrators and their families immediately.
- Strip them of any right to re-enter the Netherlands or any Western nation.
- Confront crimes like this as the societal poison they are, not as mere “learning opportunities” for sexual offenders.
Four convicted in gang rape of homeless woman to spend up to 15 mos. in youth detention
Four men were convicted in the cruel gang rape of a homeless woman in Helmond about a year ago. The District Court in Den Bosch sentenced three of them to 15 months in a youth detention center, and the other to 12 months, but they each can get three months of their sentence suspended if certain...
nltimes.nl
This is the guy that criticized Elon Musk
Ex-Labour MP arrested 'after trying to meet boy, 15, in live-stream'
FORMER Labour minister Ivor Caplin was arrested today after he was filmed allegedly trying to meet with a 15-year-old child he met online. The ex-Hove MP was stopped at his local train station by a…
x.com
x.com
Only 16% of Brits believe that Musk genuinely cares about achieving justice for victims. 44% think he's just looking for attention.
Musk is pretty much despised by Britons generally.
They hate his ass there.
Those are juveniles and they get a light hit everywhere - including Doug Ford's Ontario.Migrant Gang Rapists Brutally Attack Woman in Dutch Park—Courts Respond with Leniency, ‘Integration’ Programs, and Slap on Wrist
The courts’ disgraceful leniency—offering mere months of detention and “guidance” for such a barbaric crime—not only fails the victim but emboldens predators, proving that justice in the Netherlands bends over backward to coddle migrant criminals at the expense of public safety.
In yet another glaring example of misplaced priorities, a Dutch court handed down lenient sentences to five migrant boys convicted in the brutal gang rape and assault of a 32-year-old homeless woman in Helmond. The horrific attack took place in a public park, where the vulnerable victim was ambushed, beaten, raped in rounds, and robbed of her belongings. Instead of delivering justice for the victim and ensuring public safety, the court prioritized “help” and “integration” for the migrant perpetrators, shielding them behind juvenile law and deliberately minimizing public scrutiny of their heinous crimes.
The Crime: A Chilling Attack in Helmond
The horrific crime occurred on December 16, 2023, in Helmond’s Burgemeester Geukerspark. The victim, a homeless and vulnerable 32-year-old woman, was sitting alone on a bench at night when the teenagers ambushed her. They surrounded her, locked her in, grabbed her under her arms, and dragged her to a grassy area where they carried out their depraved attack. She was beaten, her mouth covered to silence her screams, and raped multiple times in rounds by the attackers.
Adding to their depravity, the boys also robbed the woman of her cell phone before leaving her injured and abandoned. When police found her, she bore visible injuries, including facial bruises and swelling, and her pants were around her knees.
Prosecution and Verdict
The Public Prosecution Service (OM) prosecuted the five boys for gang rape, demanding only two years of juvenile detention, six to eight months of which would be conditional. Until the verdict was announced, the suspects remained in custody. However, the court’s sentences fell well short of these demands:
The perpetrators were also ordered to pay the victim just over €15,000 in compensation.
- Three suspects were sentenced to 15 months of juvenile detention, with three months suspended and a two-year probation period, for gang rape and theft of the victim’s phone.
- One suspect received 12 months of juvenile detention for gang rape.
- The fifth suspect, charged with assault rather than rape, was sentenced to four months of juvenile detention.
Secrecy and Leniency: Protecting the Criminals, Not the Victim
The entire case was shrouded in secrecy, with all court sessions held behind closed doors because the suspects were minors at the time of the crime. Media coverage was minimal, and police were reluctant to release details. This deliberate lack of transparency shields the attackers from public scrutiny while downplaying the severity of the crime.
The Court’s Disgraceful Priorities
The court’s decision to impose lenient sentences highlights its troubling priorities. Instead of ensuring justice for the victim and deterring future crimes, the judge focused on the perpetrators’ integration. Calling the boys “unaccompanied, minor foreigners,” the court insisted they “still need a lot of help and guidance” to function in Dutch society. As part of their sentence, they must complete an intensive guidance program through youth probation services, adding to the burden on Dutch taxpayers.
A Betrayal of Justice and Public Safety
This leniency is a slap in the face to the victim and to Dutch citizens. By prioritizing “help” for the rapists over justice for the victim, the court sends a dangerous message: violent criminals can exploit their status as “vulnerable migrants” to avoid meaningful punishment. Instead of integration programs, the response should have been swift and decisive:
This case represents more than a failure to protect one woman; it reflects a broader failure to prioritize the safety and dignity of citizens over the appeasement of violent criminals. The time has come for the Netherlands to abandon its misplaced leniency and enforce justice with the strength and clarity its people deserve.
- Deport the perpetrators and their families immediately.
- Strip them of any right to re-enter the Netherlands or any Western nation.
- Confront crimes like this as the societal poison they are, not as mere “learning opportunities” for sexual offenders.
Four convicted in gang rape of homeless woman to spend up to 15 mos. in youth detention
Four men were convicted in the cruel gang rape of a homeless woman in Helmond about a year ago. The District Court in Den Bosch sentenced three of them to 15 months in a youth detention center, and the other to 12 months, but they each can get three months of their sentence suspended if certain...
It's got fuck all to do with whether they're "migrants" or not.
The fact that the actual data shows a significant majority of grooming gangs in the UK were white doesn't impact a good racist story.
Whoopdi I'm sure his feelings are hurt.x.com
Only 16% of Brits believe that Musk genuinely cares about achieving justice for victims. 44% think he's just looking for attention.
View attachment 396147
Musk is pretty much despised by Britons generally.
They hate his ass there.
Musk brought forth an old case just to fuck w new labour govt.
I'm surprised he didn't claim we must do something about muslim gangs flying into the world trade center and pentagon.
Reality is some of these international groups are bad news and happy we helped them meet their 72 virgins.
But take an honest look at all threats.
I'm surprised he didn't claim we must do something about muslim gangs flying into the world trade center and pentagon.
Reality is some of these international groups are bad news and happy we helped them meet their 72 virgins.
But take an honest look at all threats.
Point being that Brits can spot an asshole - or "arsehole" as they would say it - from 3,000 miles away!!!
The pedophilia prosecution rates are pretty much in line with the % representation in the total population of various racial groups.
Musk was born and raised in a country that the Brits raped and pillaged and yet you think it's their opinion that matters most.
Musk came from a family that made its wealth from raping and pillaging through apartheid.
