Epic dodge.I'm not franky, logged on to here 24/7. Some days I do this thing like pretend I have a social life.
And still waiting for the reasons why you "need" a semi-auto rifle.
Concession accepted.
Epic dodge.I'm not franky, logged on to here 24/7. Some days I do this thing like pretend I have a social life.
And still waiting for the reasons why you "need" a semi-auto rifle.
Lol.Epic dodge.
Concession accepted.
Justifying "need" is stupid; it's irrelevant especially when you have failed time and again to justify why they shouldn't be available AND how such a costly program can improve public safety. Might as well argue against automatic transmissions or disposable lighters.Lol.
Still waiting for why regular Canadians NEED a semi-auto rifle and why you think a 5 round magazine limit is unfair.
Thank you for admitting there is no civilian need for semi-auto long guns. Next step is for you to admit that the societal need for semi-autos is outweighed by the potential dangers, the same reason why cars, planes, and pretty much every field have had safety regulations added over the years.Justifying "need" is stupid; it's irrelevant especially when you have failed time and again to justify why they shouldn't be available AND how such a costly program can improve public safety. Might as well argue against automatic transmissions or disposable lighters.
If necessity was enough justification for or against something, society would have much fewer choices and freedoms.
The "potential dangers" are exaggerated and just as applicable to the rules for thee, not for me crowd. It's utter hypocrisy.Thank you for admitting there is no civilian need for semi-auto long guns. Next step is for you to admit that the societal need for semi-autos is outweighed by the potential dangers, the same reason why cars, planes, and pretty much every field have had safety regulations added over the years.
Most important is in our form of democracy, the government are the ones making the decisions. We can all lobby them but when it comes down to it...
Do you think that Poilievre's government will actually loosen gun laws when elected?
Okay then. By the way, what weapons did the NO terrorist have?The "potential dangers" are exaggerated and just as applicable to the rules for thee, not for me crowd. It's utter hypocrisy.
"Need" is such a bullshit argument, responsible use is what matters.
Banning a bunch of semi-autos has demonstrably not done anything to improve public safety and has always been a gigantic waste of taxpayers' money.
Did Trudeau legalize prostitution?
Difference being, Johns and SPs aren't put on a centralized government watch list.
Thought we were discussing gun laws in Canada. What weapons did the Portapique shooter have? Oh yeah, smuggled, illegal firearms; like almost every shooter we hear about in the news.Okay then. By the way, what weapons did the NO terrorist have?
And despite your libertarianesque views when it benefits you, we have a government that decides what 'responsible use' is acceptable.
p.s. The basic purpose of sex is to create life. For guns it's to take it. Both can be fun to 'practice' but fun doesn't mean it has to be legal.