What Policy turned you off Trudeau?

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
6,853
3,982
113
I find your comments interesting in light of the fact that only 6 Prime Ministers in Canadian history have served a longer consecutive term than JT. Even some Prime Ministers who have served more years in office have done so non-consecutive occasions. It's like the electorate gets tired of the ruling party and wants a change, regardless of political philosophy.
It's about context and its place in time.
Harper served almost 10 years and helped Canada crawl out of a devastating recession. However, even that couldn't erase the impact it had on Canadians.

Trudeau was the perfect candidate that the Liberals offered. He had the name. He was young. And he resonated with young voters who had come of age by the time he was elected. Everyone was quick to forgive him for scandals as long as they saw a future with him as the leader.

Almost 10 years later, those same young voters are in their late 20's/early 30's and have realized they were sold a lie. Their pay goes to taxes that are squandered. Life is unaffordable. They've realized what printing money & government debt translates into. They're pissed.

It will take a decade to fix what the Liberals have done but change needs to start somewhere.
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
22,561
1,397
113
What I will say is I knew Trudeau was in major trouble when Home Developers where starting losing money.

This was happening in 2022 and he never addressed it. He'd probably be in good standing if he did.
What does the Fed govt have to do with profitability of home developers? Home dev almost exclusively falls within municipal and provincial jurisdiction. Feds can only provide subsidies and financing and tax policy, like CMHC for example. The issue IMHO is the whole process of development which involves zoning, site plan, environmental, inspection, density etc etc, It all takes too long, and time is money.
 

DesRicardo

aka Dick Dastardly
Dec 2, 2022
2,278
2,277
113
What does the Fed govt have to do with profitability of home developers? Home dev almost exclusively falls within municipal and provincial jurisdiction. Feds can only provide subsidies and financing and tax policy, like CMHC for example. The issue IMHO is the whole process of development which involves zoning, site plan, environmental, inspection, density etc etc, It all takes too long, and time is money.
Then why is he wearing a hardhat standing in front of a housing development project giving a speech?



:ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,354
2,993
113
you have no proof of that, just the usual AB chip on shoulder.
you are still a Trudeau apologist / fanboy and you claim someone else is slow ???
the jury has coming in with the verdict : and your hero has been convicted: moron in the first degree
The sentence: Canadians will have a very difficult road to hoe for several generations

its time you clued in
the Lonnie left experiment in Canada has failed

If you can't see that, then you are really a bit exceptionally slow.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bazokajoe

RZG

Well-known member
Mar 4, 2007
796
736
93
they can stay at your place

you do not seem capable of learning from past events
immigration can not exceed housing development nor health care capacity


adding 30 million people will make Canada a major disaster
For sure if they are added to the current structure of the country. We need doctors, nurses, other medical, trades, construction, engineers and such. Trudeau allowed no skills invaders and lay-abouts who arrive to bleed the social systems dry, claiming to be refugees coming from America or India. Give our heads a fuckin` shake. How about some mass deportation to clean this shit up. Done properly Canada could be a formidable powerhouse, not the weak and pathetic shambles Trudeau has created.
 

silentkisser

Master of Disaster
Jun 10, 2008
4,336
5,437
113
No policy in particular.
Just the progressive decline in Canadian economic opportunities, quality of life, inflation, foreign relations etc. as a result of his decisions.
Plus his general demeanour, refusal to take ownership when things go wrong, etc.,
Yeah, most of his policies were not bad for the country. Some were poorly handled (immigration, for example. I understand what they were trying to do, but it wasn't implemented properly).

What did it for me was his constantly stepping on the rake and getting smacked in the head. He went from one self-inflicted wound (scandal) to the other, and several of them had similar characteristics. Then, the whole feminist thing. I applaud him putting equal number of women in cabinet, but he made some of them to just be tokens and not really allowed to do the work.

I really wish Erin O'Toole was still leading the PCs. He was honourable. I find PP to be a liar who just says whatever he can to anger up Canadians.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shaquille Oatmeal

WyattEarp

Well-known member
May 17, 2017
7,358
2,101
113
It's like dating a chick for 9 years, and then thinking it would be better to date her best friend. Nine years later, you realize it's no different.
I don't know......it can be quite exhilarating to take up with a new chick particularly one your ex knows.
 

WyattEarp

Well-known member
May 17, 2017
7,358
2,101
113
It's about context and its place in time.
Harper served almost 10 years and helped Canada crawl out of a devastating recession. However, even that couldn't erase the impact it had on Canadians.
Don't forget the commodity crash in 2015 was not good for the Canadian economy. Extraneous economic events can still be detrimental to the ruling party. We political junkies like to think every election is about ideological affirmation.
 

WyattEarp

Well-known member
May 17, 2017
7,358
2,101
113
Toronto Escorts