While I agree with your bottom line that the consumer pays for everything since corporate costs get passed into the prices. However, consumers have choices as to what the consume, so they choose to pay those prices.
Now to allude that corporation are heavily subsidized, not sure how you get there. Corporate taxes are about 35% of personal taxes, so they are paying for things. Also, they employ people, who otherwise wouldn't be paying income taxes, so indirectly these corporations are responsible for the lion's share of personal income taxes. They also pay other taxes, either directly if they own property or indirectly if they rent their premises through their rent. Do corporation get tax incentives, sure, in some cases I don't agree with them, but the intent is to have them reinvest in their company and grow and employ more people to increase the standard of living overall.
You have a very distorted view of things, which leans to a very socialist perspective.
People and corporates pay taxes.
People pay taxes only because they have salaries. Corporates do because they turn a profit.
People have salaries only because they are paid by their employers (government or corporations).
Corporates only pay salaries because people pay for their products and services and they are able to turn a profit.
Corporates are able to produce products and services only because the laws and regulations enacted by the government are conducive for conducting business, and help them turn a profit.
The government collects all these taxes and in-turn provides services to people and businesses, that help us maintain quality of life and help businesses conduct business.
So essentially money goes around in a circle, which is why that last line in my previous post remarked that this does not help Skoob's argument.
Therefore the debate is not on how money flows.
The debate is who is more valuable - the public sector or the private sector.
The public sector is more valuable because they provide essential services.
They build roads, they provide city infrastructure, they regulate profit making industries that makes consumption easier, they provide healthcare, pensions, employment insurance, pay for disability, employ law enforcement, EMTs, defend the nation and enact laws to promote an attractive business environment etc.,
And they also bail out the private sector during recessions.
This does not mean the private sector is not important.
But they exist within the environment the public sector creates.
Hence the public sector/government is the most important.
This is just reality not socialism.
www.thestar.com
