You dont even need a court case to call someone a rapist or hold that opinion.
Looks like you are in the middle of your best double twisting double backflip move.
Elon Musk to head Trump's Gestapo.
- Thread starter Ceiling Cat
- Start date
Looks like you are in the middle of your best double twisting double backflip move.
Your arguments about backing the rule of law have one major problem.
You were willing to accept aiding genocide in order to win an election.
So you believe he was officially declared guilty of rape despite the jury report? Yes or no answer.
It didn't matter to voters because it wasn't true. Don't insult voters with your assumption that they agreed with the verdict but it wasn't important to them.
Show me that the percentage of the popular vote for Trump was less than for Harris. Let's see how your new found math works if you disagree with my claim.
Well you can call someone a marshmallow or a tractor if the voices in your head are telling you to do so...doesn't mean it's true.
You seem confused.
Maybe I'll wait for a few more of your posts so you can pretend you didn't say something contradictory.
No.
It was officially declared that he can't claim you are defaming him if you say he is a rapist and a jury concluded he was a rapist.
I know you want to believe that, but you don't actually know that.
I am quite sure that is true of some voters, though.
With over 150 million of them, it is basically a certainty.
Of course I never said that. I wouldn't say anything was true of all the voters, because saying it was (like you did above) would be comically stupid.
I don't have to.
You claimed "The majority of American voters obviously saw through all of this and it backfired on the Dems."
Since Trump didn't win the majority of the votes (he seems to have finished just below 50%), even if you were mad enough to think every single person who cast a vote for Trump "saw through this all" it isn't a majority of the American voters.
(I never claimed he got fewer votes than Harris, so I'm not sure why you are asking about that.)
Just love how you liberal loonies make Nazi connections to the Trump conservative agenda lol
What a joke obviously you have no idea of the history of Nazi Germany
What a joke obviously you have no idea of the history of Nazi Germany
Lot's of assumptions on your part...not sure where to begin.
You said " Since a majority of American voter didn't vote for Trump "...yet when you look at the American voters that voted for him, he had more than Harris.
So you try and imply things and then backtrack? Ok.
If you are "quite sure" it means you're guessing. Unless you have proof?
They tried everything.
Nazi connections are just one thing they tried to keep him out of office.
That's how desperate they were.
It's actually an insult to those who truly suffered under Nazi rule.
But liberals never really think things through so not surprised here.
I dont have anything to say to Trump flunkys who keep getting banned and keep nipping at my heels lol.You're one to talk, since I eviscerated you, you refuse to respond. Are you really that scared of me? You know I can't hurt you thru the computer right? Just your kittycat feelings
We live in Canada.
Trump is the President elect of a foreign state.
Hey, the cornfield is calling you:
"Come back to the cornfield Mr. Strawman. You're embarrassing yourself on TERB"
There's is nothing contrafactual in Val's statement that you quoted above,
Yet, you still, oh wait <ring, ring, ring> Hey Skoob, the cornfield is calling. They want you ......"
This is usually the outcome when crows in a cornfield pluck all the straws from Strawman's head.
Last time you called me discombobulated for suggesting you said something, I proved that you did.
So you can stop calling others what you in fact are.
The funny part here is neither of you can explain the strawman argument but instead just distract away from your failure as usual.
You can play with words all you want to buy time and save yourself some imminent embarrassment...but we all know you just end up falling on your face eventually.
Val was mistaken or he explained his view incorrectly. Either way, my point and facts still stand.
The only thing you proved is that you need your own Olympics category for mental gymnastics.
Sounds like you have conveniently forgotten.
Want a refresher so you can continue to embarrass yourself?
