There have been numbers that range from 8 million to 20 million. Is 8 million an insignificant number to you even if that were it? Stop distracting.Where did you come up with the 20 million votes?
You have not even attempted to answer this question though I clearly answered your question. Just answer a question for a change!!
He won't answer that question.You didn't answer? What is wrong with proper I.D.?
No you didn't. Your answer was the rules are the rules. That's not an answer.Butler, I answered the question umpteen times. But why can you not answer why The Republicans are the mainly the ones to be prosecuted for voter fraud in spite of those voter IDs being legislated in some of those States?
Republican former congressional candidate charged with stealing ballots in Indiana
Larry Savage was participating in a test of the voting system in Madison county when police say he took two ballots
![]()
Republican former congressional candidate charged with stealing ballots in Indiana
Larry Savage was participating in a test of the voting system in Madison county when police say he took two ballotswww.theguardian.com
Good lord, Butler.How does it skew the vote? Are you trying to say certain demographics are Incapable of presenting I.D? Other nations don't. Please explain.
Voter ID is a good deterrent for election cheating...why are you liberals so against it?Good lord, Butler.
This is simple and well documented.
You make the laws to accept ID your voters are more likely to have and reject ID voters of other parties are more likely to have.
For instance: gun owners mostly vote Republican, students mostly vote Democrat.
Therefore you pass an ID law that makes gun permits legal ID to vote but student IDs are not allowed.
There is a REASON Canada has a huge list of options, not all of which are photo ID, and even the option not to have ID.
Because the point is to make sure the system runs smoothly and you that the voting rolls are accurate and that everyone allowed to vote CAN vote.
That's not the point of "strict ID" laws in the US. The point of those is to restrict the franchise and preferably restrict it in ways that rig the system in your favour.
Now, I see later in the thread you are against the Canadian laws as well, since they provide too many options, so it seems this is just another one of those things we disagree about.
First of all, it isn't that great a deterrent for election cheating.Voter ID is a good deterrent for election cheating...why are you liberals so against it?
what are you even pissed about? obviously people voted...and it was a majority win for the democrats if you really look at it...it's simply that it's moderate democrats disguised as republicans...First of all, it isn't that great a deterrent for election cheating.
But we aren't against "voter ID".
We are against the laws designed to disenfranchise people from voting.
We're pro-voter.
It would be nice if you people took voting seriously and joined us.
A law set up like Canada's would get massive support from Democrats and really from most fair-minded Americans.
Sadly, it isn't something you lot are interested in.
Sorry.what are you even pissed about? obviously people voted...and it was a majority win for the democrats if you really look at it...it's simply that it's moderate democrats disguised as republicans...![]()
![]()
Are you really that fucking stupid? It's bver arguing WE DON'T NEED voter I.D and me saying we do.Good lord, Butler.
This is simple and well documented.
You make the laws to accept ID your voters are more likely to have and reject ID voters of other parties are more likely to have.
For instance: gun owners mostly vote Republican, students mostly vote Democrat.
Therefore you pass an ID law that makes gun permits legal ID to vote but student IDs are not allowed.
There is a REASON Canada has a huge list of options, not all of which are photo ID, and even the option not to have ID.
Because the point is to make sure the system runs smoothly and you that the voting rolls are accurate and that everyone allowed to vote CAN vote.
That's not the point of "strict ID" laws in the US. The point of those is to restrict the franchise and preferably restrict it in ways that rig the system in your favour.
Now, I see later in the thread you are against the Canadian laws as well, since they provide too many options, so it seems this is just another one of those things we disagree about.
You Mean like proof of address? Photo I.D? You know, the shit Democrats are AGAINST?First of all, it isn't that great a deterrent for election cheating.
But we aren't against "voter ID".
We are against the laws designed to disenfranchise people from voting.
We're pro-voter.
It would be nice if you people took voting seriously and joined us.
A law set up like Canada's would get massive support from Democrats and really from most fair-minded Americans.
Sadly, it isn't something you lot are interested in.
What nonsense are you now waffling. That 8 million was before all the votes were counted and it is now less than that number....yes around 4 million. Obviously, your 20 million is something that you pulled out of your you know what!! Can you not comprehend that numerous voters stayed away due to the choice of these two candidates as I previously explained? More than 159 million voted in 2020, whereas there were just over 155 million in 2024!! But you still cannot explain what that "20 million discrepancy" was supposed to have meant!!There have been numbers that range from 8 million to 20 million. Is 8 million an insignificant number to you even if that were it? Stop distracting.
You haven't answered anything. You just keep repeating the same bs over and over again.
here...let me prove it to you:
Why don't you support every voter having to show photo ID when casting their vote?
But you are Happy with how the Electoral College works when Trump gets just about 1.6% more votes but takes 58% of the Electoral votes.Nope. I'm not.
What difference is that going to make to the voter counts if it is mandatory, can you explain it?No you didn't. Your answer was the rules are the rules. That's not an answer.
What is wrong with Mandatory I.D.?
Listen butler, do not make any fake allegations of what I stated. Where did I say that "WE DON"T NEED voter I.D??Are you really that fucking stupid? It's bver arguing WE DON'T NEED voter I.D and me saying we do.
Wait, sorry, yes you are actually that devoid reading comprehension. I forgot. You are usually struggling with actual sentences all the time.
And as to the rest, student I.D is NOT GOVT ISSUED I.D. Gun permits are. So that was a really bad Strawman on your part. Like really bad, stupid and you need to do much better.
Also, a student at a school needs to change their voter registry. All the weird state rules and all that. It's all about residency. No different Than in Canada when they ask my address and proof of it it's to ensure I am voting in the correct riding.
It really isn't complicated. Or really that political. It's basic common sense.
Might want to try to get yourself s ome
You are the one that is deflecting when you came up with the fake conspiracy theorist nonsense regarding this "20 million votes" hypocrisy in the first place and still cannot explain how you pulled out that number and what it is supposed to prove?He won't answer that question.
He would rather deflect than come to terms with his own hypocrisy.
Deflection.But you are Happy with how the Electoral College works when Trump gets just about 1.6% more votes but takes 58% of the Electoral votes.
Why should this not be reformed to reflect the voters mandates. After all the Voter ID on the other hand whether implemented or not will not make a difference that is as significant as this Electoral College!!





