The ones who lost money when he negotiated the Afghan pull out. The ones who hear him saying he will end the wars going on now. The ones who won't be given access to the White House this time via proxy like Kelly. The ones who don't want RFk Jr. or Tulsi Gabbard in Cabinet because of their clear views.
So no one you can point to.
Just "you know, them".
But seriously, why would they be worried?
He said he was going to end the wars last time and he didn't.
He escalated them.
Threw massive amounts of drones.
Was apparently stopped repeatedly from opening new conflicts.
I completely agree that a given company might be worried about him - Trump holds grudges and probably would be happy to block someone who has access now if he doesn't think they are loyal.
But he has major defense industry backers right now -> no one is worried about the MIC not being well taken care of by Trump.
They might be hedging their bets contributing to Trump(they do that in Congressional districts and Senate Races as well). But in the end it's about who is more controllable. Who is the sure thing to kow tow.
And that's an interesting question.
Who is easier to control?
Trump is famously easy to manipulate in all kinds of ways, but he
is volatile.
You have a much greater risk of him turning on you for some weird personal reason and that might be enough reason to try and keep him out of it.
So I am sure there are companies who prefer Harris to him.
But the
industry doesn't seem to be against him, really.
They are happily donating to Trump.
As you so love to espouse, who in the arms dealers eyes are the "lesser of two evils" to their wants. It's an opinion, and a valid one.
Don't like it, I don't care. Kelly was a plant. Fuck his opinion and lies.
That's a LOT of cognitive effort to try and deny Kelly's comments.