You continue to blab about things you do not know anything about. And it feels like you're willing to believe India's denials over what your own government and security service says. And to put it bluntly, this is something that Trudeau probably couldn't present all the evidence to India due to the concerns of exposing either agents or methods (which would have pissed off our intelligence allies like the US, UK and Australia). But I know you need to feel like this is Trudeau's fault....With the limited information we have, I think he did what he could.
Well lets review what we do know then.
We know that Trudeau claimed, without evidence, in 2023 (per his own admission if we were to believe the "at that time" comment) that India killled Nijjar.
We know that RCMP has since claimed that they have evidence and they came out with this as an extraordinary measure to ensure public safety.
Its pretty stupid if you think about it.
How can public safety be ensured by saying India is involved?
We know that the Sikh groups bombed and killed 100s of Canadians.
We also know that India has designated Nijjar a terrorist, issued red notices from interpol, since 2014. Since the last 10 years!
We know that India has systematically charged Nijjar and several others in this movement under specific laws in their country.
We know that India has provided 26 extradition requests to Canada.
We know that Nijjar was a shady character.
Reviewing the actions of both of these countries, apart from trying to guilt trip me into supporting Trudeau, because he represents Canada, do you have anything at all?
Whose actions - India or Canada, is more decisive?
Trudeau only has claims. Its just talk. Embarrassing!
It seems to me that you are the one blabbing by trying to reason Trudeau's incompetence.