He apparently led a paramilitary group of Sikhs.Wait, so he was Canadian Military? Isn't that worse?
Are citizens allowed to form paramilitary groups?
He apparently led a paramilitary group of Sikhs.Wait, so he was Canadian Military? Isn't that worse?
Like I said, you are justifying and supporting what has been reported to be a foreign government killing a civilian for political purposes.Seems like he wasnt a civilian.
And no evidence presented.
OK, explain how Trudeau is responsible.Yeah, the "Trudeau is not responsible" reasoning.
The buck stops with him.OK, explain how Trudeau is responsible.
Reported. Not proven.Like I said, you are justifying and supporting what has been reported to be a foreign government killing a civilian for political purposes.
Right. So, it's his fault the Indian government cried like little bitches when confronted with evidence they were behind an assassination of a Canadian citizen on Canadian soil. You are so full of shit your eyes are brown....The buck stops with him.
What is your evidence of this? As you've said 1000 times in this thread, either you have concrete evidence, or you're lying. Have some consistency man!He apparently led a paramilitary group of Sikhs.
Are citizens allowed to form paramilitary groups?
They weren't confronted.Right. So, it's his fault the Indian government cried like little bitches when confronted with evidence they were behind an assassination of a Canadian citizen on Canadian soil. You are so full of shit your eyes are brown....
Why did Interpol issue 2 red notices against him?What is your evidence of this? As you've said 1000 times in this thread, either you have concrete evidence, or you're lying. Have some consistency man!
You made this claim.Which India used to generate red notices without evidence.
Of course, EVERYONE ELSE needs triple sealed, notarized video confessions. But Oatmeal can just say whatever.You made this claim.
Prove this as you seem to know more.
Or is it Trudeau's "trust me bro" again? What an embarrassement for boobtoucher.
I have not validated anything the Indian government has said.
I am asking why Trudeau isn't presenting evidence to validate our claims and embarrassing Canada.
So you are back to "trust me bro".Of course, EVERYONE ELSE needs triple sealed, notarized video confessions. But Oatmeal can just say whatever.
Trudeau isn't presenting evidence because it is illegal for him to do so. He can't "declassify it" because he is the prime minister, not the president. This has been explained to you enough times that all the crayons in my 64-pack-with-sharpener are down to the nubs. There's barely enough to fill you up when you decide to have them for lunch.
You continue to blab about things you do not know anything about. And it feels like you're willing to believe India's denials over what your own government and security service says. And to put it bluntly, this is something that Trudeau probably couldn't present all the evidence to India due to the concerns of exposing either agents or methods (which would have pissed off our intelligence allies like the US, UK and Australia). But I know you need to feel like this is Trudeau's fault....With the limited information we have, I think he did what he could.They weren't confronted.
They weren't presented specific evidence either per their statements.
It is just Trudeau talking and not acting.
Well lets review what we do know then.You continue to blab about things you do not know anything about. And it feels like you're willing to believe India's denials over what your own government and security service says. And to put it bluntly, this is something that Trudeau probably couldn't present all the evidence to India due to the concerns of exposing either agents or methods (which would have pissed off our intelligence allies like the US, UK and Australia). But I know you need to feel like this is Trudeau's fault....With the limited information we have, I think he did what he could.
First, as mentioned, the evidence might be intelligence that Trudeau was not at liberty to reveal (due to either jeopardizing agents or surveillance methods), but it is also something the US and UK say happened. The RCMP likely developed evidence later with the help of the intelligence.Well lets review what we do know then.
We know that Trudeau claimed, without evidence, in 2023 (per his own admission if we were to believe the "at that time" comment) that India killled Nijjar.
We know that RCMP has since claimed that they have evidence and they came out with this as an extraordinary measure to ensure public safety.
Its pretty stupid if you think about it.
How can public safety be ensured by saying India is involved?
We know that the Sikh groups bombed and killed 100s of Canadians.
We also know that India has designated Nijjar a terrorist, issued red notices from interpol, since 2014. Since the last 10 years!
We know that India has systematically charged Nijjar and several others in this movement under specific laws in their country.
We know that India has provided 26 extradition requests to Canada.
We know that Nijjar was a shady character.
Reviewing the actions of both of these countries, apart from trying to guilt trip me into supporting Trudeau, because he represents Canada, do you have anything at all?
Whose actions - India or Canada, is more decisive?
Trudeau only has claims. Its just talk. Embarrassing!
It seems to me that you are the one blabbing by trying to reason Trudeau's incompetence.
Could've, would've, should've, might be, likely.First, as mentioned, the evidence might be intelligence that Trudeau was not at liberty to reveal (due to either jeopardizing agents or surveillance methods), but it is also something the US and UK say happened. The RCMP likely developed evidence later with the help of the intelligence.
How can public safety been ensured by naming and shaming India??? Think about what you just wrote? If they are under scrutiny, what are the odds they will continue to do stupid shit like this???
Yes, Sikh terrorists were behind the Air India bombing. But, [checks notes] Nijar was 7 at the time, so he wasn't involved.
Also, why did India declare him a terrorist? He never took up arms against anyone. He, as previously mentioned, has not broken any Canadian laws, or any law that would call for an extrajudicial killing from a foreign power...
As for the extradition requests, that's India's claim. There could be many reasons why Canada hasn't acted on them, including the fact that they might target Canadian citizens who are enjoying their freedom of expression in Canada.
You are so blinded by your hatred against Trudeau that you are almost celebrating and justifying this murder. Canada and Trudeau offered India several offramps to cool down tensions, but they ignored them. Modi is authoritarian and cannot stand any criticism. Trudeau may be incompetent in some areas, but I don't think he's doing anything wrong here. So, please, cheer for Indian murderers to kill our citizens.
oracle being a troll now!!Vote orange move to East Hastings ...Take Fred Hahn with you, please.
You won't need toilet paper anymore so that's a treat. I'm assuming you use it now though.
There is a night and day difference between Terrorism and Free Speech.It is more despicable for refugees to use Canada as a safe haven to engage in terrorism.
Blowing up a plane isn't speech.There is a night and day difference between Terrorism and Free Speech.