Trudeau harming relations between India and Canada?

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
1,611
1,137
113
Again, that's not his job.

So you complain that you think Trudeau, the RCMP and CSIS have no evidence but you have even less.
Yet you are incredibly sure you know more than they do.

Why?
I am the one telling you that what we do know, is what Trudeau has told us.
Which is that we dont have evidence.
You are claiming you know more than what you have been told.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: bver_hunter

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,516
22,155
113
I am the one telling you that what we do know, is what Trudeau has told us.
Which is that we dont have evidence.
You are claiming you know more than what you have been told.
If it was just Trudeau you'd have an argument, but Singh and May back him up.
You are claiming you know he's lying but can't provide any evidence to back that up.
You have less information than PeePee, but he has the decency to hide.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,516
22,155
113
I said Trudeau has not provided evidence.
Trudeau said he did not have evidence.
You don't know that, he said 'at that time' they had intel, not evidence.
You don't know what they have now or what's in those reports.

Why are you so certain?
Do you have inside intel from Modi?
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
29,113
7,017
113
I am the one telling you that what we do know, is what Trudeau has told us.
Which is that we dont have evidence.
You are claiming you know more than what you have been told.

Its "parts of the evidence" now.
"parts of the evidence" is just code for intel. Not actual evidence.
This along with Trudeau's testimony confirms there was no evidence.
This wishy washy approach is not going to be entertained by any country.
That statement of "No evidence" has been debunked when the RCMP announced it on Thanksgiving Day.
I posted the video, and you are living in denial of that fact.
Why is the Indian Govt. not co-operating?
Simple answer........ they know that they are responsible for threats, extortion, and complicity in the death of Nijjar.

RCMP says goal is to 'disrupt the threat' after allegations link India to violence in Canada

Chief Political Correspondent Rosemary Barton speaks with RCMP Assistant Commissioner Brigitte Gauvin about investigating allegations of the Indian government being linked to a campaign of violence on Canadian soil. Plus, a conversation with Moninder Singh, a B.C. Sikh activist, and Gurpatwant Pannun, a Canadian American Sikh activist who have both been allegedly threatened by India for their support of a Sikh state.

 

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
1,611
1,137
113
That statement of "No evidence" has been debunked when the RCMP announced it on Thanksgiving Day.
From your post:
"....about investigating allegations of the Indian government being linked to a campaign of violence on Canadian soil. Plus, a conversation with Moninder Singh, a B.C. Sikh activist, and Gurpatwant Pannun, a Canadian American Sikh activist who have both been allegedly threatened by India for their support of a Sikh state."
"allegedly" is not evidence.
Trudeau said he did not have evidence, only intel.
Law enforcement does not put on a big show of "having evidence", while not charging a single criminal entity or government official.
The Americans had such evidence and they charged someone even though they did not have him in custody.
Why hasnt the RCMP?
RCMP and Trudeau are in bed with each other to drag down Pierre's campaign.
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
29,113
7,017
113
From your post:
"....about investigating allegations of the Indian government being linked to a campaign of violence on Canadian soil. Plus, a conversation with Moninder Singh, a B.C. Sikh activist, and Gurpatwant Pannun, a Canadian American Sikh activist who have both been allegedly threatened by India for their support of a Sikh state."
"allegedly" is not evidence.
Trudeau said he did not have evidence, only intel.
Law enforcement does not put on a big show of "having evidence", while not charging a single criminal entity or government official.
The Americans had such evidence and they charged someone even though they did not have him in custody.
Why hasnt the RCMP?
RCMP and Trudeau are in bed with each other to drag down Pierre's campaign.
Again those are further ongoing investigations oft threats with other Indian individuals involved with it.. But clearly they have the evidence of the Indian Diplomats involvement in those threats plus the killing of Nijjar Singh. You are being a mouthpiece for the Indian Govt!!
At the Foreign Interference Committee, Trudeau precisely stated at the end of the video that The RCMP had the evidence.
You along with the Indian Press are quoting something he stated last year in September of 2023!!
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
29,113
7,017
113
So why haven't they charged someone?
Why is this response possible from the US but not Canada?
How can they charge someone who does have Diplomatic Immunity?
I told you several times, that in the USA it was just an official linked to the Indian Government.
Here in Canada we are talking about The Indian High Commissioner and other Diplomats. This is much higher on the rung of the ladder.
An embarrassment to the Indian Government!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts