Why?Name a war in which not one civilian was hurt
Why?Name a war in which not one civilian was hurt
Tell that to North Koreans.You're talking more than 100 years after the fact. A zillion things can happen in that time.
Regardless, the point is that history has proved that if the people are unhappy, they can overthrow any government. If the Palis are unhappy with their lot in the life and the gov't is doing nothing to improve it, that plants the seeds for the people to take matters into their own hands.
Because people talk about civilians being hurt in a war as if it’s abnormal.Why?
What a clown.But the evidence is total shit.
Not true in the least.There were some repugnant and undisciplined comments initially by the wackjob assholes in Neta's cabinet that suggested genocide was on the minds of some asshole Israelis. But those were squelched. And the IDF appears rule-based and appropriate.
At this point, I think SA just wants to keep delaying the hearing until the public forgets and the petition can be quietly withdrawn.
Depends on what kind of war you are talking about. When armies meet on the field of battle. Say Waterloo. Kursk, and such, that is pretty much a civilian free casualty war. When an army targets a civilian population in a built up area it's not really the same. Is it? Nor so much a war. More of a genocide. One definition of war would be where both sides could fight back. What Israel is doing is pretty much "shooting rats in a barrel" In big game hunting they call it a "canned kill"Because people talk about civilians being hurt in a war as if it’s abnormal.
meanwhile it’s very normal (albeit very sad) and it’s all hamas’s and its various supporters responsibility
You should know the history of trying to blame the victims.Because people talk about civilians being hurt in a war as if it’s abnormal.
meanwhile it’s very normal (albeit very sad) and it’s all hamas’s and its various supporters responsibility
If you can think of a different way to ensure that the next October 7 would happen later rather than sooner, pray tellDepends on what kind of war you are talking about. When armies meet on the field of battle. Say Waterloo. Kursk, and such, that is pretty much a civilian free casualty war. When an army targets a civilian population in a built up area it's not really the same. Is it? Nor so much a war. More of a genocide. One definition of war would be where both sides could fight back. What Israel is doing is pretty much "shooting rats in a barrel"
So with the "war" that you are supporting where ostensibly the first goal was the release of the hostages, combined with an ass kicking to Hamas, how many hostages has the Israeli "war" got released? I think the tally is pretty much none. Not much to show for slaughtering over 40 thousand civilians and burning and maiming hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians who had nothing to do with October 7th. And flattening the only place they had to live to the point where it won't be inhabitable for realistically a hundred years. Bravo!
Why don't you try the one thing Israel hasn't tried in 76 years.If you can think of a different way to ensure that the next October 7 would happen later rather than sooner, pray tell
Oh I dunno. The Israeli soldiers based about a couple of miles away from the Hamas training camp were alarmed by the routine training which had gone on for a year or so before the attack. When they repeatedly warned their IDF superiors, they were threatened with court marshal if they ever bothered their superiors again. If they hadn't been ignored, that might have ensured the first October 7 didn't happen.If you can think of a different way to ensure that the next October 7 would happen later rather than sooner, pray tell
Yeah, and America allowed 9/11 to happenOh I dunno. The Israeli soldiers based about a couple of miles away from the Hamas training camp were alarmed by the routine training which had gone on for a year or so before the attack. When they repeatedly warned their IDF superiors, they were threatened with court marshal if they ever bothered their superiors again. If they hadn't been ignored, that might have ensured the first October 7 didn't happen.
Kind of makes you wonder if they didn't just allow it to happen so's they could do what they're doing.
IDF commanders ignored lookouts' warnings over Hamas massacre - report
The lookouts warned that they had seen unusual actions taking place next to the border in the months leading up to October 7.www.jpost.com
And they found all 23 hijacker passports on the ground in the rubble . Just fell out of the plane.Yeah, and America allowed 9/11 to happen
Yes, mainstream media really thinks we are stupid to believe all that. Another thing that they came up with that makes no sense is that the Earth is round.And they found all 23 hijacker passports on the ground in the rubble . Just fell out of the plane.
You gonna start talking about the dancing Israelis next?Yes, mainstream media really thinks we are stupid to believe all that. Another thing that they came up with that makes no sense is that the Earth is round.
Seems like IDF are bringing these civillians to safety, good jobMaybe you should just stick to cheering on sending kids to the death squads.
They were not the targets. They were in the wrong place at the wrong time. Have you ever heard of the term "a casualty of war"?And not one civilian was hurt in any of the footage.
Because it will totally negates your point. Civilian deaths is a given in any war meaning your point, in an attempt to demonize Israel, is moot.Why?
The rapporteurs do not make the final ruling. They've already given their input for the courts to hear.What a clown.
The UN Rapporteur said there is so much evidence the trials will take a decade.
A decade of reminding the world how evil zionists are, a decade of comparing views like yours with nazis.
Spoken like a good little brown shirtSeems like IDF are bringing these civillians to safety, good job