It is likely there was as everyone including the US were loud in trying to prevent an operation there.
Must watch: Hamas supporters burn Canadian flags on October 7
- Thread starter Conil
- Start date
Israel absolutely does battle damage assessments.
Obviously they aren't typically on the ground but they do use airborne imaging and their sources in Gaza to find out as much as they can.
I'm sure you're providing that data to the ICC. Or are you just speculating like the rest of us?
If I have the right incident in mind, they hit a Hamas compound causing a fuel tank to explode which ignited refugee tents a short distance away.
As a Canadian, I absolutely defend someone's right to burn our flag. It's pretty much embedded in our charter rights. I wouldn't do it and I will criticize people who think they are justified but it is absolutely those rights that differentiate us from places like Gaza and Iran.
What you have quoted here is pretty much what I said. Civilian casualties need to be kept to a minimum, should not be targeted and when incurred should be lower than the military advantage gained.
I said it was likely. They alleged it was a Hamas compound. No evidence was presented to ascertain that.
The Israeli government spokesperson and the PM's spokesperson said they dont and when pressed could not come up with anything.
Our laws probably allow it unless it's explicitly being done to incite violence or hatred. if you have one at home and you throw it on the BBQ, it's your business. if you do it in front of a Mosque, you could likely face charges. Same if you burnt a bible in front of a church or a torah in front of a synagogue.
I have no interest in any religious book but like with the Canadian flag, I have the freedom to criticize people who decide to burn them
As I said, Israel says they had info. Do you think they need to share all their intel with us?
As everyone has said, the measure of military advantage isn't a straightforward thing and two analysts may disagree with each other despite having the same info.
Source?
Because from the strike I am thinking of and many others, Israel has even published their imagery and added details they would only know from on the ground sources.
Problem is they came from here, not you.
Saudis were interested because of the Palestinian gas fields.
Now they see they can't afford to be linked with Israel.
You're now waving the flag of apartheid and genocide.
Israel is really winning people over.
The last poll said 59% would accept the two state solution based on the 1967 borders. A deal which gives Palestinians only 20% of Palestine.
Even that is too much for you, you won't back the two state solution ordered by the UN and ICJ.
End the occupation.
End the genocide
End apartheid.
Targeting hospitals, schools, refugee camps and other civilian targets is a war crime.
Whatever you think your justification was you're still committing acts of terrorism.
Yes, UNIFIL troops that are there to keep Israel and Hezbollah from fiighting.
Hezbollah isn't attacking them, Israel are.
So of course you blame Hezbollah.
Why should anyone trust an army that is in the process of being charged with genocide and extermination?
They should after the fact that there was an attack on civilians.
That is for the ICC and ICJ to determine and come to a conclusion. But the certainty with which some posters are saying that Israel is completely in the clear at all times is not justified.
The spokespersons were in an interview and I dont have a link for that. But see below.
Which seems to be the case. Well at least for Israel. Exceptions rules proving.
Except one side is correct and the other side is blindingly wrong.
Also you asked me who is giving them a free pass, I answered the question.
