Both could be true. Human shields are war crimes and so is disproportionate attacks that kill civilians.
Except it's not.
1: It is accepted that things like hospitals becomes legit targets if you hide your forces among them. Why not human shields. I mean how can you defeat your terrorist enemies if they hide among civilians
2: Israel does what it can to give warnings of it's attacks to avoid civilian dead even at the risk of their own troops and the effectiveness of their operations. Hamas on the other hands tells their own people to ignore those warnings, obvious to ensure as many civilian dead as possible
3: The ratio of civilian dead to combatant dead is usually 9 to 1, The US in Iraq has gotten it down to under 2.5. Israel is doing even better.
Every Palestinian corpse is the wish of Hamas and the fault of Hamas, Their Oct 7th attacks can serve no other purpose, they had no chance of exterminating the Jew form river to sea as their own charter has called for as well as their supporters. It was an attack of civilians with the murder rape and hostage taking designed to ensure that Israel would strike back and human shields would die
There is no equivalency here. One side of almost Justin Beiber level evil and the other has been placed in an unfortunate position
Read the link in my sig. It backs everything I have said with sources and citations from authoritative sources. All the terb hate crew has to respond with it is unsupported claims and lies and hypocritical insults and denial much like their friends in the holocaust denial movement.
Read the post, read the responses. If you can't tell the difference, either you are retarded or you are consumed with hate to the point of living in a world of pure imagination only without the Wonka Chocolate.