The stats have shown that Israel was killing 70% women and children, Shazi.Idiotic claim. It'd be moronic for them to claim that and they never have made that claim.
What is equally moronic, has happened and continues to happen is when those claims of 40,000 dead Gazans are tossed about, it's intended to mean and we're expected to believe is that they are all civilians. Question for you, Geno, out of the 40,000 directly killed by IDF, how many were Hamas fighters. I'm not holding my breath for an answer but if you do, this should be good for a laugh.
It's not simply a matter of wanting peace. We all want peace. It's a matter of wanting peace as quickly as possible. I have pointed out numerous times how many more Palestinian lives your suggestion is costing as we speak. The death total was 20,000 at the beginning of the year and according to you, in one of your posts that it's reasonable to assume that the total is up to 360,000. If Hamas had surrendered at the beginning of the year and returned the hostages, the total would have remained at around that 20,000 or so. That means that 340,000 have died since the beginning of the year. Your plan is stoopid.
The fact that you continue to support your stoopid plan and wait for a ceasefire and withdrawal while so many Gazans die everyday, is undeniable proof that you don't give a rat's ass how many Pali's die. It's all hollow words, rhetoric and a smoke screen. To save lives, Hamas needs to unilaterally surrender and return whatever hostages remain. But you won't call for that, because, as you've just proven once again, you don't really care.
If Israel was only killing Hamas there would be no Hamas left after nearly a year of bombings.
When Israel uses starvation as a weapon are you declaring that they are starving only Hamas or that the 1 million children in Gaza are civilians that Israel is intentionally starving? Which line will you use at the ICC and ICJ?