Feel free to explain how clever it is that you, who identify as Chinese Canadian, back Jewish and white supremacists.Oh yes, if it makes you happy
Your more retarded than i thought you were
WAS OSAMA BIN LADEN REALLY BEHIND 9/11?
- Thread starter danmand
- Start date
Just Jewish and white supremacists, whynot.
Why do you like white supremacists and Jewish supremacists?
You think they'll accept you?
The shit that comes out of your mouth makes absolutely no sense
A child can comeback better than you.
So why can't you do a good comeback?The shit that comes out of your mouth makes absolutely no sense
A child can comeback better than you.
You back trump, a white supremacist, and keep defending a genocide by Jewish supremacists.
So why would a self identifying Chinese canadian back that shit?
You think those supremacists will accept you?
So are JDL and Kahanists.I'm Canadian, and Hamas is listed as a terrorist organization in Canada.
But they are marching here and in power in Israel.
So why is Jewish terrorism something you back if you claim to be against terrorism?
/cloudfront-us-east-2.images.arcpublishing.com/reuters/MFCIQHMWHZKZVPOLZNSPA2E4P4.jpg)
US calls suspected Israeli settler attack terrorism
The sharpened language appears to reflect frustration with surging violence in the occupied West Bank.
www.reuters.com
So does that mean Palestinians are terrorist too because they support Hamas?So are JDL and Kahanists.
But they are marching here and in power in Israel.
So why is Jewish terrorism something you back if you claim to be against terrorism?
US calls suspected Israeli settler attack terrorism
The sharpened language appears to reflect frustration with surging violence in the occupied West Bank.
Is Israel listed as a terrorist organization in Canada?
JDL and Kahanists like Ben Gvir are listed as terrorists.
So why do you back Jewish terrorism?
I say haul them both to the ICC and ICJ.
You just want to kill one group of terrorists and pay of the other ones.
JDL aren't in Canada but Kach is. Kach is even banned in Israel.
The difference is none of us deny there are Jews who are terrorists while you obsessively try to defend and deny Hamas, PIJ, Quds Force, etc. are.
JDL is at U of T.
You are now aiding importing terrorists into Canada to defend your genocide.
I personally know Eric Margolis, although I haven't seen nor been in contact with him since he sold Jameson Vitamins. I wouldn't call us best friends or anything as we are definitely several strata apart in society, but I've spent many hours with him. And I've read a lot of his writing. Books, columns etc.
He is no kook, I assure everyone. Some of the things he wrote about, I had first hand, direct knowledge and understanding of the subject matter. An he was directly on-point and accurate. So I do trust him on matters that I don't have knowledge on. And knowing him through business, he is a man of integrity.
He was to the Manor born yes, but he used the freedom of his family money to become a real world travelling, investigative journalist and correspondent. This guy has been welcomed by.some of the most influential, consequential and powerful people in our lifetime. He is no bullshitter and is betrothen to no one.
You can take what he says to the bank.
I missed where he said he "likes Hamas". Where did he say that?
He seems to me to be more observational of the reality on the ground. I think he is perhaps more cognizant of the reality of the Middle East than you, I or Frankie.
I haven't read this book of his as I simply cannot take in any more conflict into my brain/life, especially when I realize that I can do fuck all about it.
American Raj Liberation Or Domination?: Resolving the Conflict Between the West and the Muslim World Kindle Edition
by Eric Margolis (Author)
In 1993 Samuel P. Huntington turned conventional political wisdom on its head by arguing in a provocative essay that the secularized West and the fundamentalist Islamic world were destined to clash-a clash of civilizations.
At about the same time, veteran journalist and foreign policy expert Eric S. Margolis was arguing virtually the same point-but from a unique vantage point: inside and on the ground in the Muslim world itself.
American Raj: Liberation or Domination? is the culmination of all those years of feet-on-the-ground reporting and analysis-many of them spent actually fighting alongside mujahedeen-as well as a lifetime of insight into the complex reality of the way the Muslim world really operates.
It is a masterful synthesis of experience and insight that answers the most pressing questions we in the West confront: Why does the Muslim world distrust us?
Is the idea of a secular Muslim world-especially one based on the western model-realistic? Has ideology blinded Western powers to both political and historical reality? Is accommodation between these two ideological adversaries possible? What can be done to prevent a clash of civilizations?
American Raj: Liberation or Domination? takes the reader behind the conventional headlines and into the thinking and world view of anti-Western Islamic radicals throughout the Muslim world, and identifies the historical, political and religious factors that have played such a huge role in generating Islamic hostility towards the West.
Employing the model of Britain's imperialist hegemony in Asia, which culminated in the eighteenth-century Raj, Margolis explores in fascinating detail whether the West-and in particular the United States-risks a repetition of the Raj experience or whether we face an entirely new-and entirely unfamiliar-world order.
Well, he was embedded with the IDF as they attacked Israel so not sure how impartial you would be given that.
Though he did say Israel's goal was, as always, colonization.
I'm more curious who you think he means when he says this.
The real culprits behind 9/11 have never been revealed.
Copyright Eric S. Margolis 2024
His sympathy seems to be with hamas. For example:
… Egypt. … has collaborated with Israel and the US in the bloody campaign to crush Gaza’s Hamas movement. Sisi, like the Saudis and Gulf sheikdoms, had a deep-seated fear of Hamas, which was democratically elected. Hamas called for a revolution in the Arab world, free elections, and an end to its status as a western colony.
MISERY ON THE NILE
ericmargolis.com
I'm seeing a common theme that unless one denounces Israel and/or Hamas/Palestinians/Islam et al, that you therefore support the other side.His sympathy seems to be with hamas. For example:
… Egypt. … has collaborated with Israel and the US in the bloody campaign to crush Gaza’s Hamas movement. Sisi, like the Saudis and Gulf sheikdoms, had a deep-seated fear of Hamas, which was democratically elected. Hamas called for a revolution in the Arab world, free elections, and an end to its status as a western colony.
MISERY ON THE NILE
ericmargolis.com
To my reading, Margolis in the above excerpt, is simply reporting on the various alliances, feuds etc. I see no factual errors nor his personal opinions showing bias.
He says hamas is democratically elected yet as we know from team “free Palestine” Palestinians are not at all responsible for hamas terror acts because there was no elections since etc etc.I'm seeing a common theme that unless one denounces Israel and/or Hamas/Palestinians/Islam et al, that you therefore support the other side.
To my reading, Margolis in the above excerpt, is simply reporting on the various alliances, feuds etc. I see no factual errors nor his personal opinions showing bias.
isn’t there a bit of a contradiction?
