Tim Walz's is a loser!!

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
29,762
7,707
113
Minneapolis has or at least had a large Nordic population as its base population for a long time. The people were that background. Hence the football team being Minnesota Vikings I guess. The wedding was a little outside the Minneapolis.

So to answer your original question, the white people got chased out.
One day when their lives return to normal without racist attacks on them by a certain individual, then maybe you will be able to go for more acceptable weddings in that State:

Demonizing Somalis is at the heart of Trump’s Minnesota strategy. His Duluth rally showed it.
“She tells us how to run our country,” Trump said of Ilhan Omar.

 

SchlongConery

License to Shill
Jan 28, 2013
13,219
6,911
113
He knows how to use an apostrophe though.
Nice thread title. Takes one to know one.
Was thinking exactly the same thing. But I still feel kind of mean picking on a guy whose 90 year old mother still has to walk him to the park with his helmet on.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: mitchell76

SchlongConery

License to Shill
Jan 28, 2013
13,219
6,911
113
  • Walz served as a command sergeant major, but did not retire at that grade because he did not complete the required training. The Guard has said, on numerous occasions, that it is accurate for Walz to state that he has served at that rank.


The dispute about Walz's rank is, at its core, a semantic one. When Walz was promoted to command sergeant major on Sept. 17, 2004, his promotion was conditional on his completing certain training. It is not uncommon for such promotions to precede the required training. He began, but did not complete, training for this role at that time, as described by the military-focused media outlet Task and Purpose:

The course Walz failed to complete was a 750-hour course in the Army's Sergeants Major Academy, which would have included 86 hours in residence at Ft. Bliss, Texas. Completing the course is mandatory for E-9s, though completing the training after being promoted is not uncommon.
Regardless, Walz served for seven months as command sergeant major. When he decided to retire, he left without completing that training. As a result, his official retirement rank is a step lower. The demotion occurred after he left, and it was administrative, not punitive. The change primarily affects Walz's military-retirement package.

The Minnesota National Guard has regularly stated that it is appropriate for Walz to say he "served as" command sergeant major. Capt. Holly Rockow, a public affairs officer for the Minnesota National Guard, told Minnesota Public Radio in 2018 that it "is legitimate for Walz to say he served as a command sergeant major."
 

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
77,792
93,895
113
  • Walz served as a command sergeant major, but did not retire at that grade because he did not complete the required training. The Guard has said, on numerous occasions, that it is accurate for Walz to state that he has served at that rank.


The dispute about Walz's rank is, at its core, a semantic one. When Walz was promoted to command sergeant major on Sept. 17, 2004, his promotion was conditional on his completing certain training. It is not uncommon for such promotions to precede the required training. He began, but did not complete, training for this role at that time, as described by the military-focused media outlet Task and Purpose:


Regardless, Walz served for seven months as command sergeant major. When he decided to retire, he left without completing that training. As a result, his official retirement rank is a step lower. The demotion occurred after he left, and it was administrative, not punitive. The change primarily affects Walz's military-retirement package.

The Minnesota National Guard has regularly stated that it is appropriate for Walz to say he "served as" command sergeant major. Capt. Holly Rockow, a public affairs officer for the Minnesota National Guard, told Minnesota Public Radio in 2018 that it "is legitimate for Walz to say he served as a command sergeant major."
@mitchell76 has been told this several times, but ignores the information.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: mitchell76

SchlongConery

License to Shill
Jan 28, 2013
13,219
6,911
113
Here is the actual facts of Tampon Tim and claims he legislated tampons in Boys bathrooms.



In 2023, Walz signed a school funding bill into law containing a provision that guaranteed access to free menstrual protection to Minnesota students from the fourth through the 12th grade. This legislation required all school districts and charter schools to stock menstrual products, and the language of the law was gender neutral. It read (emphasis ours):

A school district or charter school must provide students with access to menstrual products at no charge. The products must be available to all menstruating students in restrooms regularly used by students in grades 4 to 12 according to a plan developed by the school district. For purposes of this section, "menstrual products" means pads, tampons, or other similar products used in connection with the menstrual cycle.
While the law did not specifically mention boys' bathrooms, it also did not restrict the rule to female or girls' bathrooms. Paired with the laws protecting children's access to gender-affirming care, this would require schools that do not provide gender-neutral restrooms to ensure such products to are available transmasculine students — that is, students who are either trans boys or students born female whose gender expression is masculine — to access them. In theory, this could require the stocking of menstrual products in boys' bathrooms in some cases, though the editorial board of the Minneapolis Star-Tribune argued that is not the case:

Critics contend, wrongly, that it mandates menstrual products in boys' bathrooms. This has unfortunately been used to stoke ongoing culture wars over transgender individuals.
 
Toronto Escorts