Twisting words I see. Your usual death knell when losing an argument.Now you're arguing that rump raped Carroll with his fingers and his mushroom shaped dick?
You're still trying to defend rump, aren't you?
I can't wait to see what you have to say in defence of rump's visits to pedo island.
It's funny watching you mix up reality to suit your narrative. That's what Marxism does to people. You should get help for that affliction.The big picture?
rump admitted he grabs women by the pussy cuz he's rich and can get away with it.
Then in testimony he though Carroll looked his wife at the time.
Then there are the 25 other rape allegations, the payoffs to Stormy and others, the creepy comments about his kids and his trips to pedo island.
Are you in a cult?
That's what you always say when you've lost the debate, someone is 'twisting words' when they quote you.Twisting words I see. Your usual death knell when losing an argument.
Now run along to your next conspiracy theory...watching you crawl down the rabbit hole is funny.
Of course you can't debate the facts.It's funny watching you mix up reality to suit your narrative. That's what Marxism does to people. You should get help for that affliction.
Because you did twist my words. It's that simple and easy to prov just by looking at my posts.That's what you always say when you've lost the debate, someone is 'twisting words' when they quote you.
You really are quite sad.
Of course you can't debate without twisting words and spreading misinformation.Of course you can't debate the facts.
You are whining.Because you did twist my words. It's that simple and easy to prov just by looking at my posts.
That's how we all know you've lost the argument.
Go to it.Because you did twist my words. It's that simple and easy to prov just by looking at my posts.
That's how we all know you've lost the argument.
This is good!You don't see the big picture here.
Tell me how anyone would believe her other than a biased judge, when she said he used his finger & penis, but the jury did not find that otherwise based on NY law they would have checked off rape as well?
The answer is most likely that she, and the judge's prosecutor friend, couldn't prove it. So they accepted "probability" about everything else that didn't require as much proof. i.e. he said/she said using a much lower burden of proof for civil court.
Total sham that would have been laughed out of criminal court if it was tried there instead.
I said:You are whining.
Unless you can specifically state how I 'twisted' your words you are just whining that once again you lost a debate.
Do you think it's ok to force anything Ina woman's vagina against her will ? Does it really matter what he forced in her unwillingly?I said:
"If she said he used both his fingers and penis, but it was determined that wasn't the case by the jury (otherwise they would have also selected rape based on NY law), then why would that be if she was telling the truth?
You've been played by a biased judge."
You said:
"Now you're arguing that rump raped Carroll with his fingers and his mushroom shaped dick?"
Specifically stated enough for you Mr. Twister of People's Words?
She testified she couldn't tell if it was his tiny fingers or tiny mushroom dick.I said:
"If she said he used both his fingers and penis, but it was determined that wasn't the case by the jury (otherwise they would have also selected rape based on NY law), then why would that be if she was telling the truth?
You've been played by a biased judge."
You said:
"Now you're arguing that rump raped Carroll with his fingers and his mushroom shaped dick?"
Specifically stated enough for you Mr. Twister of People's Words?
In the context of this case, what matters is the truth. She can't even keep her facts straight. Finger? Penis? 1997? 1998?Do you think it's ok to force anything Ina woman's vagina against her will ? Does it really matter what he forced in her unwillingly?
Even after I proved with quotes that you twisted my words, you double-down and further twist them. You have zero integrity but we all knew that already. It's just entertaining watching you twist yourself into a pretzel when caught.83 mil
She testified she couldn't tell if it was his tiny fingers or tiny mushroom dick.
You say she countered that testimony in some interview.
I expect you got it wrong, not Carroll.
But you also brought it up that you said Carroll claimed it was both tiny fingers and tiny dick that were forced inside her.
You did this as if it were a defence of rump's $83 million rape.
I didn't twist words, I posted what you claimed.
Too late.In the context of this case, what matters is the truth. She can't even keep her facts straight. Finger? Penis? 1997? 1998?
You are asking the wrong questions. Put aside your TDS for a moment and look at this objectively.
Too late.Even after I proved with quotes that you twisted my words, you double-down and further twist them. You have zero integrity but we all knew that already. It's just entertaining watching you twist yourself into a pretzel when caught.
If the jury found that he inserted his penis then they would have checked-off rape on their report. They didn't. She lied. A point you keep conveniently overlooking.
"Carroll told jurors last week that Trump put his fingers into her vagina, which she called "extremely painful," and then inserted his penis."
https://www.reuters.com/legal/e-jea...egedly-raped-her-friend-testifies-2023-05-02/