No, Shazi, Al Jazeera is not antisemitic.
You just think its antisemitic to report on the genocide you promote here daily.
You are backing Smotrich's 'Final War'.
Hamas leader killed in Iran
- Thread starter K Douglas
- Start date
You just think its antisemitic to report on the genocide you promote here daily.
You are backing Smotrich's 'Final War'.
Wait, give me a few seconds to stop laughing.
OK. I think I'm better now.
Your concept of reasonable is taking a somewhat accepted number of dead and arbitrarily quadrupling it and claiming that it is fact.
You have no concept of what reasonable means, including what you just told basketcase.
Al Jazeera is a superb cable news network Puts US cable news to shame and exceeds the BBC for breadth of coverage.
The medical professionals applied a standard battlefield formula for casualties vs reported death and the Lancet published it.
This wasn't my calculation, it was the experts in the field and was published by the most credible medical journal around.
You back killing genocide, your definition of reasonable is killing 16,000 children so you can steal their land.
Counting dead in the field of combat is not medicine. They are out of their area of expertise. They never visited the war zone. In what other wars have they offered their opinion? The Lancet did not agree with or vouch for anything in that letter to the editor. They did not review it.
Show us examples where else this "formula" has been previously utilized such that it is standard? You have been unable to provide a single example. And just like Einstein came up with E=mC squared, who came up with this formula? In what year? You are just BSing. You can't answer those questions.
Go to the Lancet piece, Shazi.
Read the entire thing.
Check the sources listed at the bottom.
Click on the links to those sources.
Read them.
If that's not enough, check out sources sited in those pieces.
That is the basics of research.
Do it and until then STFU.
Your ignorance is loud and boring.
The Lancet correspondence (should you wish to review it) is here: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(24)01169-3/fulltext
The relevant paragraph about estimating the death - direct and indirect - caused by the conflict to that point is as follows.
That citation is to this paper about the Global Burden of Armed Violence.
Specifically, it appears to be referencing table 2.3 on page 40.
You will see that the numbers there for the ratio track with what they are claiming.
So it is a single source (although that table is sourced to multiple other sources of data) that they are using to justify the range. From that range they did, indeed, pick a reasonably conservative number.
But this does clarify that all that letter to the Lancet is, is an educated guess about what the number might be.
But given that Israel has killed most of the journalists in Gaza and destroyed pretty much all of the hospitals where the counting of dead is done, educated guesses are what we are left with.
Nobody can count how many are missing, how many are buried in rubble and how many are close to death from injury, starvation or disease.
I did and I never saw one comment from the Lancet itself vouching for what was written. Nothing will change the fact that your phony headline was just an out and out lie.
Hamas shouldn't have attacked on October 7... we won't be guessing how many deaths where how.
.
Yet they never attributed blame to either side. They are casualties of a war. Geno would have us believe that all deaths are Israel's fault and Israel's only.
You didn't check the sources.
Another Shazi failure.
This is in the west bank, its an attack on Palestinians.
Its not Hamas.
If Israel wasn't occupying Palestine illegally Hamas wouldn't have attacked.
Blame the occupation.
Neither the article nor the sources assign blame for any of the deaths.
Your headline falsely said that Israel killed them all. The study, as flawed as it may be, was estimating how many casualties of war there were. No blame to either side was ascribed.
Speculation. Can't be proven.
Eradicating Jews and "liberating" Palis from the river to the sea is the stated goal. Most likely, terror attacks were always in the game plan.
I guess the UN will have to do some investigating to see who's been dropping all those bombs on Gaza.
I wonder who it could be.
I don't want anyone dead, I want the ceasefire to end.
And I've happily marched with these Jews to try to get politicians to listen.
Stop accusing all Jews of being zionists, that's hate speech to accuse them all of being genocidal.
I suppose, but up until now they have issued no resolutions condemning Israel of committing genocide. Your claims of Israeli genocide are BOGUS.
