If Kamala doesn't define herself and her positions, the Trump campaign will define her and that won't be complementary.The King of Kings is without sin, I don't think calling Kamala Harris a retard will cut the mustard.
Wyatt Earp have you seen the film La La Land?If Kamala doesn't define herself and her positions, the Trump campaign will define her and that won't be complementary.
rump is still looking for a good nickname for her.If Kamala doesn't define herself and her positions, the Trump campaign will define her and that won't be complementary.
I do think her website needs to be beefed up.If one likes to see platforms and an articulation of policy positions, I think Harris has a way to go. The campaign websites are strikingly different as currently constructed. Harris' website simply asks for money. Trump's website has a platform with many positions. Some are general and some are specific.
Luckily, she has an entire 4 years of work in the administration to draw from.Now forgive me for reminding everyone, but if Harris had went to through a normal primary process she would have developed a platform and everyone would know where she stood on issues. As far as we can tell, Harris is going to change/adjust some of her positions from her 2020 Presidential run and Senate tenure. It would be a good thing to know sooner than later in a 100 day campaign.
There really was a weird Newsom mini-boomlet at some point.You might be on to something there.
Gavin Newsom parachuting into the Super Bowl in February, 2028.
I actually think one of the smarter moves she has made is shifting the tone away from just being the anti-Trump without dropping it.I wouldn't blame her, but it could backfire. If she decides to go that route, you also have to wonder if her platform would actually appeal to moderate voters.
Why?The last thing Val wants is her in a position where she has to think on her feet.
Beneath you, Wyatt.It sounds like she's better on her back. (oops, sorry I couldn't resist that. )
Oh come on.NY Times are the equivalent of China's State run media
It sounds like she's better on her back. (oops, sorry I couldn't resist that. )
One can only hope.Beneath you, Wyatt.
Phil, Valcazar pushes the point that mainstream media is mean to all candidates.Oh come on.
Their pro-Trump stance isn't that blatant.
There's a whole thread on "politicians I would like to bang" or something.Valcazar, this is TERB. A little locker room talk should be expected.
I don't know your M.O. but you can tell some guys roll here from other political forums and are surprised by some of the male vibe.
No.Phil, Valcazar pushes the point that mainstream media is mean to all candidates.
Very true.The press isn't supposed to be her friend.
We can agree on that. However, the New York Times has a certain political agenda their newsroom pushes. It also sounds like it can cause tension for those who don't stick to the agenda 100%.No.
I push the point that they are mostly terrible at political reporting and also are pretty biased.