Slightly agree as well...question remains...who has actually been running the country these past few years?
If you work for large organizations- us government amongst the largest, but you see this at GM and IBM etc - the CEO issues the policy in conjunction with input from top deputies. You delegate a lot of those decisions to them, whom report back in the staff meetings.
Thus hiring good people and letting them work and not micro managing them is good management. Policies exist so your staff, when faced with uncertain issues, can refer to policy. When there is no policy but whims tweeted at all hours is a terrible way to lead and will destroy a large org over time.
And, in a large organization you cannot turn it around on a dime. It's like an ocean liner. Gotta get folks on board and make sure things can happen. Then as CEO you guide your lieutenants, and make the ultimate decisions. And, as one gets older one does adjust things so as to optimize ones attention and resources. So to assume Biden was not in charge and addled is a hallucination, as far as all the first hand accounts go. He's a guy been dealing with all aspects of government for 50 years. He did not step down because he said he could not do the job. He stepped down because he realized the perception of too many Americans was we could not do it, and thus he might be hurting the party.
It's not running a 7-11 lol.
Again, all effective orgs do this. The shitty fly by seat of ceos pants.