How Far Kamala Has Cum
- Thread starter TomFord1980
- Start date
So what? Her first election as Attorney General in 2010 she barely won despite both Democrat senate candidates soundly defeating their Republican opponents. In 2016 her Senate run was largely a no contest she didn't earn the victory due to anything popular she did. It was right place right time. You have seen her, she is not a good politician. The only reason she was picked for the VP ticket was because they wanted a woman of color and she had the Obama endorsement.
No Bernie was a mayor -he was elected mayor of Burlington, Vermont in 1981. He was re-elected three times. In 1991, he became a United States representative for Vermont's at-large congressional district. He was a congressman for 16 years prior to being a senator.
Um, that's not how commercial real estate works. For guys like us it's about income, equity and formulas. For guys like Trump and other billionaires it's a different set of rules.
The city chooses the value. The Bank chooses to value. All Trump did was argue it. It's legal to do that. There was no fraud because there was no victim. The bank got paid back. The city got the taxes it set the value at.
This is the core thing. Trump had no power here. He has to accept their valuations. That's why this is so weird.
But really it's impossible to lie as a homeowner for a credit line. Or to lie to the city.
Yair but she won. Not many people have done what she did. So the idea being propagated that she somehow hasn't done anything is wrong. She deserves some props and her work questioning individuals as a senator was good and intelligent. Sarah Palin was a vilified a bit but she had been a mayor and was elected a governor, and I've always respected that (even though the state had less people than the city of San Francisco). She did devolve into something comical though. Who knows where Kamala will go. As I said, she's not my first choice.
Again, I don't think she's a whiz kid (Booty-judge is though) nor do I find anything innovative about her and legislators without executive experience are often problematic. She did put crims in gaol as AG in a state larger than Canada or Australia but there again nothing innovative etc seems to exude from her efforts. If she learns from Joe and Obama to get good people around her and set up a decision making process she can be successful. Joe did much better than anticipated because of that. The Trump style is surround by sycophants and toadies who will only tell him what he wants to hear. That's the recipe for disaster, and was. Trump had some decent pros around him at first but he chased out all of those people (Priebus, Cohen, McMaster, Tillerson, Mattis, Kelly, etc). And every one who had worked for Trump say he's an absolute moron. He refuses to read his briefings, they have to turn them into cartoons with his name heroically placed just to get him to pay attention. Hes profoundly ignorant about the world, but believes he knows more about the military than generals, more about the law than lawyers, more about medicine than doctors, etc. He spends the mornings watching TV - Fox specifically- and golfed more in 4 years than Obama in 8.
There are books galore on this. BTW, these books points out how even Democratic administration's have fallen into this pattern (eg Kennedy's process for bay of pigs VS soviet missile crisis). Johnsons process on Vietnam went bad too.
The reality here is that Trump was the one who offered the inflated valuations. Should the banks have done more due diligence? Yes, of course. But here's a reality check for you: lying on documents about things like that is FRAUD. You can spin it anyway you like, but it is not legal or ethical. Now, about the "agreed upon price" you're talking about. That goes for an actual sale! You can price your home for $14m, doesn't mean anyone will buy it. But, if I thought it was worth it, that's on me. I am buying it with all that risk. Insurance and loans are different beasts, which I surely hope you understand.
And who is "They?" Misogynists? People who want to slander her or grind her down? Basically, cowards who spread lies.
But this time, she's running against an old, senile dummy. So she should have an easy win.
The pathetic slut-shaming has already started.
After all, this is a party that just veep-nommed Catholic incel-boy JD Vance to lead it!!!
She had an affair with Brown. And recieved her first political appointments under his purvue during that time. It was her doorway to California Democrat politics and it's machine.
Then why was he the first one ever charged in 100 years in NYC? And no other real estate mogul since?
They were both single. Thus it's pejorative to label it an affair. They dated. Yes, he helped her get appointed to a board. And endorsed her for DA, and throughout her career.
Not many men can go from a fraudster to president either (and remain a fraudster). Not sure if it’s a compliment though.
I hate gutter posts like this from Loonie Laura. Its easy enough to criticize Kamala on her putrid record alone.
LOL. No, she did not. Brown was separated from his wife decades before they dated, and all he did not appoint her. She was elected as DA. Massive fucking difference, but why let facts get in the way of a good slandering....
Fact-Checking the False Claims About Kamala Harris
Fact-checking the wave of false claims about Kamala Harris’ presidential eligibility and background.
Could be a number of reasons. Probably the biggest was the Michael Cohen tipped off the DA about it. I would imagine this has been done in the past, but the banks might have cancelled the loans when it was discovered.
