You declare all facts 'irrelevant' when they prove you are wrong.
Trudeau telling world leaders climate change is a security issue at NATO summit
- Thread starter oil&gas
- Start date
No, I declare you irrelevant because you're always wrong, especially when you jump into other people's discussions and miss the entire context and point just to continue trolling.
Same, when you are shown to be wrong then you have to declare the facts irrelevant and now me too.
Its really quite funny
The floods are a great example of right wing approach to climate change.
DoFo and Tory cut cash for flood management in half.
Did you see the flood pictures on lakehore, right by the area DoFo wants to build the $650 million underground parking lot for his foreign spa buddies?
Difference is I actually provide proof...you make up your own "proof" and spread misinformation more than anyone else on this board.
Does a week go where when you don't accuse me of lying and then I prove you wrong and you change the subject and distract from your false accusations?
No.
You fall on your face every time so much so that it's becoming predictable.
I guess all you have left is to troll by interjecting into other's posts and just making false accusations.
Sad really.
It is really amazing the stories you tell yourself.
Do you actually believe them or do you just enjoy the trolling?
The UK just gave out 5 year sentences for planning a protest against climate change.
BTW the US DoD also lists climate change as a national security threat.
We're already seeing a shit ton of humans being displaced due to droughts and floods etc.
We're already seeing a shit ton of humans being displaced due to droughts and floods etc.
I believe world leaders at the UN addressed by Greta Thunberg actually
agreed with her. They must be in agreement with Greta to have invited her and
applauded her speech. And I am not surprised if no NATO members would
disagree over climate change being an existential threat to their countries which
by now is ostensibly accepted as the undisputed truth among pretty much all
leaders in the western world. Trudeau might have come across as pedantic
though when reminding world leaders of the threat of climate change at an
event of a coalition of military defense. In all likelihood, shoring up defense
for NATO-Europe against Putin in light of the possibility of Trump's
comeback and members like Canada not doing their share of adequate
defense spending, were infinitely more pressing issues than climate
change on the minds of NATO members.
NATO members did
applaud at the end of Trudeau's speech. But I suspect that none of them
on their way home would worry about climate impact of generating more
carbon emission on the Ukraine war battlefield through providing more aid
money to Zelensky to fight to the last man by virtue of enlightenment of
Trudeau's speech.
Evacuations in the West again for forest fires.
Food security is becoming a global issue.
Trudeau is delinquent. If you fall behind on your hydro bill your power gets cut off. What is so wrong with Trump asking NATO nations to pay what they promised to for USA defense?That will put Pee Pee on the spot if he takes over after the 2025 Elections. Let's see if he can fulfill Canada's pledge to NATO.
Maybe he will follow his idol called Trump and pull Canada out of NATO!!
Food security should not be an issue I'm Canada or the USA. Yet that is what you get with liberal governments. Weak men, create hard times.
How do conservative governments solve this then? I imagine cutting off exports is part of that.
It means more spending by the Federal Government. The ones moaning and groaning about it are the usual Conservatives. But remember that in 2014 under the previous Harper Government the Defence spending dropped to less than 1%. The lowest it has ever been since 1960. At least The Liberal Government have increased that budget and are committed to meeting that target as promised. Well if Pee Pee is elected, then hopefully he does not get that "Power Cutoff".........LOL!!
It's not like Harper was in office in the previous century!! He was just the previous Government. Same as Wynn when taking the Premiers into consideration. Yet you righties have no problem in attacking her. One has to take into consideration the job creations, and the economy that is still triple A rated as compared to similar economies. If it is that bad to you and the rest of the righties can come up with an explanation as to why we have not been relegated into a lower tier?
Ratings.Moodys.com
ratings.moodys.com
Don't tell skoob but...It's not like Harper was in office in the previous century!! He was just the previous Government. Same as Wynn when taking the Premiers into consideration. Yet you righties have no problem in attacking her. One has to take into consideration the job creations, and the economy that is still triple A rated as compared to similar economies. If it is that bad to you and the rest of the righties can come up with an explanation as to why we have not been relegated into a lower tier?
Ratings.Moodys.com
