Shots fired outside all-girls Jewish school in North York

[Frankfooter]

shack said:
The Lancet made no comment

The Lancet never comments on what they publish.

The Lancet conducted no study of their own.

The Lancet doesn't do research, they look for the best research and publish it.

The Lancet reviewed no study on this subject.

The Lancet judged the work to be important and accurate so published it.

The Lancet simply published a letter to the editor sent to them.

Yes, they read it, judged it trustworthy, accurate and important and published it.
That is their role.

The Lancet did not vouch for the content of that letter to the editor.

They did, otherwise they wouldn't publish it.

The study accepted Hamas' inflated numbers at face value and then quadrupled them.

A previous Lancet study established that Gaza hospital's casualty numbers have been historically accurate.
There have been so many attacks that by Israel that its easy to judge how they did previously.

No mainstream media has commented on this farcical study as being valid.

Yes, the MSM is trying to bury this story, as they did with Israeli apartheid and genocide reports.

The study said that Israel and Hamas are equally responsible.

Bwahahahahah

Idiotic
What a load of idiotic, whiny attempts to attack yet another trusted source.
You've attack the UN, ICC, ICJ, Amnesty, HRW, B'tselem, MSF, Unicef, UNRWA and every media around the world.
They stand as trustworthy, you are stuck as a racist, hateful supporter of genocide.
You now are on the same moral plane as the nazis.

 

[Klatuu]

I did no research other than read that letter to the editor. Just like the Lancet did none in regards to this article. It wasn't necessary

See, you cannot refute anything that I said. C'mon, I challenge you to refute my points, one by one. You can't do it. You will simply slink away with a lame excuse. One by one, Geno.

shack said:
The Lancet made no comment.
The Lancet conducted no study of their own.
The Lancet reviewed no study on this subject.
The Lancet simply published a letter to the editor sent to them.
The Lancet did not vouch for the content of that letter to the editor.
The study accepted Hamas' inflated numbers at face value and then quadrupled them.
No mainstream media has commented on this farcical study as being valid.
The study said that Israel and Hamas are equally responsible.

Like I said, thoroughly debunked.

All you are doing Geno is reinforcing your image of being a hate-filled racist and ageist. Ad hominem attacks and lies is all you've got.

What I say is the truth.

Says the least trusted person on TERB. They are trustworthy. That's they didn't endorse or vouch for that sham of a study. (See my above list and refute my points.)

Deflections. Dishonest. Uninformed

 

[shack]

The Lancet never comments on what they publish.

No, they comment on whether the research is properly conducted.

The Lancet doesn't do research, they look for the best research and publish it.[/QUOTE]They didn't publish on any research done on this topic. The comments that you site are authored by the researchers, not the Lancet.

The Lancet judged the work to be important and accurate so published it.

No they didn't They published a letter to the editor, not the actual study.

Yes, they read it, judged it trustworthy, accurate and important and published it.
That is their role.

None of that is true. It was a comment from the authors to the Lancet.

They did, otherwise they wouldn't publish it.

They published a comment that was sent to them. They did not publish a review of the study.

A previous Lancet study established that Gaza hospital's casualty numbers have been historically accurate.
There have been so many attacks that by Israel that its easy to judge how they did previously.

All of which is your BS rhetoric. What happens in hospitals is a tiny fraction of what goes on in the war. The UN has stated that Hamas numbers are vastly inflated. And many hospital casualties are due to faulty Hamas rockets hitting those hospitals. We are talking about this letter to the editor, not historical estimates.

Please show us this study that was conducted by the Lancet.

Yes, the MSM is trying to bury this story, as they did with Israeli apartheid and genocide reports.

LOL. You need a conspiracy theory. Why would they try to bury it? Are the Jews threatening them with space lasers.

Idiotic
What a load of idiotic, whiny attempts to attack yet another trusted source.

Lancet is a trustworthy source for peer reviewed scientific studies. This has nothing to do with science and has not been peer reviewed. Nobody wants to touch it and be associated with it. This was not a source of reporting. It was simply a letter to the editor of the biased authors.

You've attack the UN, ICC, ICJ, Amnesty, HRW, B'tselem, MSF, Unicef, UNRWA and every media around the world.
They stand as trustworthy, you are stuck as a racist, hateful supporter of genocide.

"Every media around the world." LOL. This is why nobody takes you seriously. You just invalidated your own claims.

You now are on the same moral plane as the nazis.

Your wish to have all Jews exterminated IS actual Naziism. The final solution.

BTW, why did you not mention that not only did The Lancet not blame Israel, even the authors did not blame Israel, as you claim? Your title says that Israel killed 180,000. That's a lie. Nobody said that Israel was to blame for even one death, let alone the 22 million that you'd like to see. According to this study, Hamas is, at minimum, equal to blame. Show us the passage where the authors said Israel was the cause of deaths. You made that up.

 

[shack]

Deflections. Dishonest. Uninformed

Detritus.

 

[basketcase]

Everyone knows that it is Netanyahu who is blocking a ceasefire.
...

Other than the UNSC you mean.

1. Welcomes the new ceasefire proposal announced on May 31, which Israel accepted, calls upon Hamas to also accept it, and urges both parties to fully implement its terms without delay and without condition;

 

[basketcase]

Meanwhile, since this is about schools and ...

You mean the school where even Hamas admitted their commanders were killed in the strike?

Hamas is violating international law and as Sinwar has repeatedly admitted, they are happy to sacrifice anyone to get good PR.

Hamas hiding among civilians in Gaza to protect itself, ambush IDF troops, NYT reports

Terror group uses children to lure soldiers into false sense of security as it hides underground, waiting to spring carefully laid traps; tunnels have landline phone network

www.timesofisrael.com

 

[Frankfooter]

No, they comment on whether the research is properly conducted.
The Lancet doesn't do research, they look for the best research and publish it.[/TE]They didn't publish on any research done on this topic. The comments that you site are authored by the researchers, not the Lancet.
No they didn't They published a letter to the editor, not the actual study.
None of that is true. It was a comment from the authors to the Lancet.
They published a comment that was sent to them. They did not publish a review of the study.
All of which is your BS rhetoric. What happens in hospitals is a tiny fraction of what goes on in the war. The UN has stated that Hamas numbers are vastly inflated. And many hospital casualties are due to faulty Hamas rockets hitting those hospitals. We are talking about this letter to the editor, not historical estimates.
Please show us this study that was conducted by the Lancet.
LOL. You need a conspiracy theory. Why would they try to bury it? Are the Jews threatening them with space lasers.
Lancet is a trustworthy source for peer reviewed scientific studies. This has nothing to do with science and has not been peer reviewed. Nobody wants to touch it and be associated with it. This was not a source of reporting. It was simply a letter to the editor of the biased authors.
"Every media around the world." LOL. This is why nobody takes you seriously. You just invalidated your own claims.
Your wish to have all Jews exterminated IS actual Naziism. The final solution.
BTW, why did you not mention that not only did The Lancet not blame Israel, even the authors did not blame Israel, as you claim? Your title says that Israel killed 180,000. That's a lie. Nobody said that Israel was to blame for even one death, let alone the 22 million that you'd like to see. According to this study, Hamas is, at minimum, equal to blame. Show us the passage where the authors said Israel was the cause of deaths. You made that up.

So much genocidal rambling justifications.
Give it up, Shazi.

Israel is committing genocide according to the UN and every human rights organization.
The Lancet says zionists have likely killed 186,000 Palestinians.

Stop whining and admit this is exactly what you've dreamed of and argued for here.

 

[Frankfooter]

You mean the school where even Hamas admitted their commanders were killed in the strike?

Hamas is violating international law and as Sinwar has repeatedly admitted, they are happy to sacrifice anyone to get good PR.

Hamas hiding among civilians in Gaza to protect itself, ambush IDF troops, NYT reports

Terror group uses children to lure soldiers into false sense of security as it hides underground, waiting to spring carefully laid traps; tunnels have landline phone network

www.timesofisrael.com

The NYT spoke to Hamas for this information?
Holy fuck is that stupid.

Did they go to Gaza?
The NYT is a laughing stock after the Gaza rape stories they took months to retract.

Find a legit source, like this.

 

[Frankfooter]

Other than the UNSC you mean.

1. Welcomes the new ceasefire proposal announced on May 31, which Israel accepted, calls upon Hamas to also accept it, and urges both parties to fully implement its terms without delay and without condition;

Netanyahu never agreed, Biden lied.

Netanyahu says he won't agree to a deal that ends the war in Gaza, testing the latest truce proposal

His latest comments come at a sensitive time and could represent another setback for mediators trying to end the war.

apnews.com

 

[Klatuu]

No, they comment on whether the research is properly conducted.

The Lancet doesn't do research, they look for the best research and publish it.

They didn't publish on any research done on this topic. The comments that you site are authored by the researchers, not the Lancet.

No they didn't They published a letter to the editor, not the actual study.

None of that is true. It was a comment from the authors to the Lancet.


They published a comment that was sent to them. They did not publish a review of the study.

All of which is your BS rhetoric. What happens in hospitals is a tiny fraction of what goes on in the war. The UN has stated that Hamas numbers are vastly inflated. And many hospital casualties are due to faulty Hamas rockets hitting those hospitals. We are talking about this letter to the editor, not historical estimates.

Please show us this study that was conducted by the Lancet.


LOL. You need a conspiracy theory. Why would they try to bury it? Are the Jews threatening them with space lasers.

Lancet is a trustworthy source for peer reviewed scientific studies. This has nothing to do with science and has not been peer reviewed. Nobody wants to touch it and be associated with it. This was not a source of reporting. It was simply a letter to the editor of the biased authors.

"Every media around the world." LOL. This is why nobody takes you seriously. You just invalidated your own claims.
Your wish to have all Jews exterminated IS actual Naziism. The final solution.

BTW, why did you not mention that not only did The Lancet not blame Israel, even the authors did not blame Israel, as you claim? Your title says that Israel killed 180,000. That's a lie. Nobody said that Israel was to blame for even one death, let alone the 22 million that you'd like to see. According to this study, Hamas is, at minimum, equal to blame. Show us the passage where the authors said Israel was the cause of deaths. You made that up.
[/QUOTE]

Self contradictory. Panicked. Amateurish. Cult fanaticism.

 

[shack]

So much genocidal rambling justifications.

As usual instead of factual responses you resort to baseless accusations Geno.

Give it up, Shazi.

Shazi means fragrance. Why do you think that I smell like perfume? Do I get you hard, Geno? (Such a perfect nick that is easy for anyone to understand. But Shazi? WTF is that?)

Israel is committing genocide according to the UN and every human rights organization.
The Lancet says zionists have likely killed 186,000 Palestinians.[/QUOTE]Debunked over and over.

shack said:
No, they comment on whether the research is properly conducted.
The Lancet doesn't do research, they look for the best research and publish it.[/TE]They didn't publish on any research done on this topic. The comments that you site are authored by the researchers, not the Lancet.
No they didn't They published a letter to the editor, not the actual study.
None of that is true. It was a comment from the authors to the Lancet.
They published a comment that was sent to them. They did not publish a review of the study.
All of which is your BS rhetoric. What happens in hospitals is a tiny fraction of what goes on in the war. The UN has stated that Hamas numbers are vastly inflated. And many hospital casualties are due to faulty Hamas rockets hitting those hospitals. We are talking about this letter to the editor, not historical estimates.
Please show us this study that was conducted by the Lancet.
LOL. You need a conspiracy theory. Why would they try to bury it? Are the Jews threatening them with space lasers.
Lancet is a trustworthy source for peer reviewed scientific studies. This has nothing to do with science and has not been peer reviewed. Nobody wants to touch it and be associated with it. This was not a source of reporting. It was simply a letter to the editor of the biased authors.
"Every media around the world." LOL. This is why nobody takes you seriously. You just invalidated your own claims.
Your wish to have all Jews exterminated IS actual Naziism. The final solution.
BTW, why did you not mention that not only did The Lancet not blame Israel, even the authors did not blame Israel, as you claim? Your title says that Israel killed 180,000. That's a lie. Nobody said that Israel was to blame for even one death, let alone the 22 million that you'd like to see. According to this study, Hamas is, at minimum, equal to blame. Show us the passage where the authors said Israel was the cause of deaths. You made that up.

 

[Klatuu]

No mainstream media has commented on this farcical study.

Shazi…you are completely out of your league on this. Remember your fiasco when you tried to misrepresent the authors?

Why researchers fear the Gaza death toll could reach 186,000

War doesn’t just kill people through direct violence. Malnutrition, healthcare shortages and unsanitary conditions inevitably follow

www.theguardian.com

At least 186,000 deaths in Gaza could result from the Israel-Hamas war, researchers estimate

An analysis published by The Lancet medical journal underscores the difficulty of accurately documenting the human toll of the conflict, now entering its 10th month.

www.msnbc.com

Being a member of the Ziontology cult seems to force you to embarrass yourself.

 

[shack]

Why researchers fear the Gaza death toll could reach 186,000

War doesn’t just kill people through direct violence. Malnutrition, healthcare shortages and unsanitary conditions inevitably follow

www.theguardian.com

At least 186,000 deaths in Gaza could result from the Israel-Hamas war, researchers estimate

An analysis published by The Lancet medical journal underscores the difficulty of accurately documenting the human toll of the conflict, now entering its 10th month.

www.msnbc.com

So aside from a couple of sources reporting that the authors of the biased and non-scientific study sent a letter to the editor of the Lancet, you are agreeing with all of my other points. You did not attempt to refute them.

As well, the Guardian talked about indirect casualties of war, not that they were killed by Israel. Hamas instigated this war by committing a terror attack on Oct.7 in which they committed crimes against humanity according to HRW. Hamas is at least as much to blame for those indirect casualties.
(595) Global rights group finds Hamas-led militants committed war crimes on Oct. 7 | Toronto Escorts Review Board Forum | Terb

And of the 38,000 that Hamas claims have been directly killed, half of them were Hamas fighters.

So the exaggerated claims of 186,000 have now been whittled down to 19,500. It's actually less because it is accepted that Hamas have inflated the actual numbers.

That's quite the strong argument you've got there kkklatu. Not.

 

[Klatuu]

So aside from a couple of sources reporting that the authors of the biased and non-scientific study sent a letter to the editor of the Lancet, you are agreeing with all of my other points. You did not attempt to refute them.

As well, the Guardian talked about indirect casualties of war, not that they were killed by Israel. Hamas instigated this war by committing a terror attack on Oct.7 in which they committed crimes against humanity according to HRW. Hamas is at least as much to blame for those indirect casualties.
(595) Global rights group finds Hamas-led militants committed war crimes on Oct. 7 | Toronto Escorts Review Board Forum | Terb

And of the 38,000 that Hamas claims have been directly killed, half of them were Hamas fighters.

So the exaggerated claims of 186,000 have now been whittled down to 19,500. It's actually less because it is accepted that Hamas have inflated the actual numbers.

That's quite the strong argument you've got there kkklatu. Not.

Embarrassing face saving. Deflections. Repeatedly unable to meet minimal standards of accuracy.

 

[Frankfooter]

Israel is committing genocide according to the UN and every human rights organization.
The Lancet says zionists have likely killed 186,000 Palestinians.

Thank you for finally admitting Israel is committing genocide and you are there with them for every single killing.

Loading…

twittter.com

 

[Frankfooter]

So aside from a couple of sources reporting that the authors of the biased and non-scientific study sent a letter to the editor of the Lancet, you are agreeing with all of my other points. You did not attempt to refute them.

As well, the Guardian talked about indirect casualties of war, not that they were killed by Israel. Hamas instigated this war by committing a terror attack on Oct.7 in which they committed crimes against humanity according to HRW. Hamas is at least as much to blame for those indirect casualties.
(595) Global rights group finds Hamas-led militants committed war crimes on Oct. 7 | Toronto Escorts Review Board Forum | Terb

And of the 38,000 that Hamas claims have been directly killed, half of them were Hamas fighters.

So the exaggerated claims of 186,000 have now been whittled down to 19,500. It's actually less because it is accepted that Hamas have inflated the actual numbers.

That's quite the strong argument you've got there kkklatu. Not.

Nobody agrees with your rambling, Shazi.
The Lancet is trustworthy, you are an old racist cheering for killing children.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1810682298028679425

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812600916756877602

 

[shack]

Embarrassing face saving. Deflections. Repeatedly unable to meet minimal standards of accuracy.

Hardly.

Shazi/Fagrance…you are completely out of your league on this.

Why researchers fear the Gaza death toll could reach 186,000

War doesn’t just kill people through direct violence. Malnutrition, healthcare shortages and unsanitary conditions inevitably follow

www.theguardian.com

At least 186,000 deaths in Gaza could result from the Israel-Hamas war, researchers estimate

An analysis published by The Lancet medical journal underscores the difficulty of accurately documenting the human toll of the conflict, now entering its 10th month.

www.msnbc.com

Being a member of the Ziontology cult seems to force you to embarrass yourself.

Says the amoeba. What does Ziontology mean? What does Shazi mean? How embarrassing is it to use words that you can't even define? But it's OK to be ignorant when you are Geno's lapdog/Little Buddy. All you have to do is to parrot him without thinking. Tell us what those words mean?

I posted this prior to your latest reference so it was true at the time I posted it:

You left out the part that says that what they published was simply a, and I quote, correspondence from the authors, who are clearly biased. Calling it a genocide, when the UN has made no such declaration, is proof of that. As well, if you read what they wrote they never assessed blame to Israel. It is simply a number, flawed as it may be.

They are a peer-review publication. They did not do a peer-review assessment of the opinion piece, nor has any other publication. That is because it is trash.

But I'm glad that you accept all of my other points. You did not even attempt to refute them. You are out of your element. You need to go back to the swamp water with your other one-celled colleagues.

shack said:
The Lancet made no comment.
The Lancet conducted no study of their own.
The Lancet reviewed no study on this subject.
The Lancet simply published a letter to the editor sent to them.
The Lancet did not vouch for the content of that letter to the editor.
The study accepted Hamas' inflated numbers at face value and then quadrupled them.
The study said that Israel and Hamas are equally responsible.

I'm waiting for rebuttals, one by one. Geno tried and failed. Go ahead. One word insults don't count as rebuttals. Do you know how to use facts?

 

[Klatuu]

Hardly.

Says the amoeba. What does Ziontology mean? What does Shazi mean? How embarrassing is it to use words that you can't even define? But it's OK to be ignorant when you are Geno's lapdog/Little Buddy. All you have to do is to parrot him without thinking. Tell us what those words mean?

I posted this prior to your latest reference so it was true at the time I posted it:



But I'm glad that you accept all of my other points. You did not even attempt to refute them. You are out of your element. You need to go back to the swamp water with your other one-celled colleagues.

shack said:
The Lancet made no comment.
The Lancet conducted no study of their own.
The Lancet reviewed no study on this subject.
The Lancet simply published a letter to the editor sent to them.
The Lancet did not vouch for the content of that letter to the editor.
The study accepted Hamas' inflated numbers at face value and then quadrupled them.
The study said that Israel and Hamas are equally responsible.

I'm waiting for rebuttals, one by one. Geno tried and failed. Go ahead. One word insults don't count as rebuttals. Do you know how to use facts?

Inferiority complex.

 

[shack]

Inferiority complex.

An Amoeba, a single celled organism is by definition the most inferior organism on Earth. If you start using words that you understand and that actually mean something, you might not look like such a fool.

What is the definition of a Ziontologist, Little Buddy.

And you have absolutely ZERO words to refute one word of my claim that the Lancet does not support the biased content of that letter to the editor.

 

[Frankfooter]

I'm waiting for rebuttals, one by one. Geno tried and failed. Go ahead. One word insults don't count as rebuttals. Do you know how to use facts?

Wait for this instead.