Conservatives win St Paul's byelection

CLOUD 500

Active member
Jan 10, 2005
606
198
43
It was a pandemic.
The government was acting to try to keep deaths low and for the most part succeeded.
Where governments didn't the deaths were way higher.
You mean scamdemic. Under 1% death rate is not a pandemic. But Trudeau wanted power and was profiting off this. Think of much inflation they caused with this scamdemic, governments benefited a lot and so did grocery stores. And the vaccines was one of the ways Trudeau made shit loads of money. If it were not for the truckers we would still be under covid mandates today.
 

Knuckle Ball

Well-known member
Oct 15, 2017
7,274
3,385
113
the wonderful thing about democracy is that offers the chance to remove corrupt morons from power

odd how historically the left has often eliminated elections once they gained power
Historically speaking, neither the Left nor the Right have the market cornered on authoritarianism. In the world we exist in today, the right are the ones who oppose democracy.


how's your extortion business doing these days ?
great for you
terrible for all others
Meh…my extortion business ain’t what it used to be. Thx for asking.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
89,060
21,174
113
You mean scamdemic. Under 1% death rate is not a pandemic. But Trudeau wanted power and was profiting off this. Think of much inflation they caused with this scamdemic, governments benefited a lot and so did grocery stores. And the vaccines was one of the ways Trudeau made shit loads of money. If it were not for the truckers we would still be under covid mandates today.
For anti vaxxers like you, within the next couple of years you will have had covid on average 7 times, a few of those non symptomatic.
Likely it'll leave your IQ down 9 points and complaining about brain fog and being tired and unable to point out why.
I'd say remember this post, but you won't be able to.
 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
13,127
1,912
113
Ghawar
Historically speaking, neither the Left nor the Right have the market cornered on authoritarianism. In the world we exist in today, the right are the ones who oppose democracy.
...........................
In many parts of the collective west today the right has to support democracy
since winning democratic election against the left is the only way they can return
to power.
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,844
2,841
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
My God, did you even read the article? It's not only people who are buying and selling property for profit yearly. Again, you need to stop listening to Justin.

The federal government’s decision to increase the capital gains inclusion rate to 66.7 per cent from 50 per cent on amounts above $250,000 for individuals and on all gains for corporations has caused a lot of angst amongst business owners, professionals, investors and property owners, to name just a few. Any Canadian who has a trust or incorporated business (holding company) will see a significant increase in their taxes. Working professionals who are allowed to incorporate, for example, accountants, lawyers, doctors, realtors etc. In other words, for corporations, all capital gains are now subject to the two-thirds inclusion rate.

That's a huge difference, which is why so many people are upset with these new changes.

dude you are talking to somebody who don't know how taxes and the economy works
 

DesRicardo

Well-known member
Dec 2, 2022
1,739
1,479
113
Liberal MPs are scared of losing their jobs.

Trudeau off at his cottage telling them he'll get back to them later.🤣
 
  • Like
Reactions: drewstar

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
19,941
14,327
113
But it's the topic your beloved Trudeau focused on while the Canadian economy was dwindling....so tell me....if you're a realist...are trimester fetuses alive or not? Don't shy away from the topics the left will be clinging on once peepee wins. Abortion,gender, etcetera
I do not shy away from anything and I am completely pro-abortion, and it is a woman's choice. I hope Pee Pee puts his foot in his mouth and goes after abortion rights ala Trump.

BTW, did Justin send you a letter to consider getting a sex change????

You really need to stick your head out of the rabbit hole and take a breath.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
30,093
4,279
113
I do not shy away from anything and I am completely pro-abortion, and it is a woman's choice. I hope Pee Pee puts his foot in his mouth and goes after abortion rights ala Trump.

BTW, did Justin send you a letter to consider getting a sex change????

You really need to stick your head out of the rabbit hole and take a breath.
He has already clearly stated abortion will not be touched. People are wise to that line now by him. It's not going to work.
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
16,796
2,451
113
Historically speaking, neither the Left nor the Right have the market cornered on authoritarianism. In the world we exist in today, the right are the ones who oppose democracy.
wrong
the commies offed 50 to 100 million of their own people in the 20th century


Meh…my extortion business ain’t what it used to be. Thx for asking.
well at least you know what you are
 

southpaw

Well-known member
May 21, 2002
1,731
1,478
113
A recent study in the New England Journal of Medicine reveals that people who have recovered from mild COVID-19 cases lose about 3 IQ points. Those with long COVID see a 6-point drop, while ICU patients lose 9 points. Just getting reinfected was associated with losing an extra 2 points in IQ.
But Frank, aren't IQ tests deeply flawed, and don't really measure intelligence? That's what the Left has been saying for decades. So why should we care about losing a few arbitrary points on a meaningless test?
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
89,060
21,174
113
But Frank, aren't IQ tests deeply flawed, and don't really measure intelligence? That's what the Left has been saying for decades. So why should we care about losing a few arbitrary points on a meaningless test?
Sure, they are flawed if you are objectively comparing people.
But useful here if you take a test pre covid and then post covid.
 

southpaw

Well-known member
May 21, 2002
1,731
1,478
113
Sure, they are flawed if you are objectively comparing people.
But useful here if you take a test pre covid and then post covid.
I see. They are flawed if the results contradict a particular leftist cause.
But useful here because the results support a different leftist cause.

The leftist capacity for doublethink on their causes is as strong as the right's is for their foreign masters.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: richaceg

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
89,060
21,174
113
I see. They are flawed if the results contradict a particular leftist cause.
But useful here because the results support a different leftist cause.

The leftist capacity for doublethink on their causes is as strong as the right's is for their foreign masters.
When confronted with logic you can't dispute do you think using the word 'leftist' means you can declare it doesn't count?
 

southpaw

Well-known member
May 21, 2002
1,731
1,478
113
When confronted with logic you can't dispute do you think using the word 'leftist' means you can declare it doesn't count?
But I am disputing your faulty logic. If IQ tests are valid for comparing the same individual at different points in time, then they are equally valid for comparing different individuals.

Example: A teenager was 5'6" a year ago, and 5'9" today. By your logic, we can say he's taller now than he was a year ago. But it's invalid to compare him now to another 6'0" tall teenager and say one is presently shorter than the other.

Either we accept the measurement as accurate in both cases, or we reject it as useless for both. We can't pick and choose when it is accurate as we see fit.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
89,060
21,174
113
But I am disputing your faulty logic. If IQ tests are valid for comparing the same individual at different points in time, then they are equally valid for comparing different individuals.

Example: A teenager was 5'6" a year ago, and 5'9" today. By your logic, we can say he's taller now than he was a year ago. But it's invalid to compare him now to another 6'0" tall teenager and say one is presently shorter than the other.

Either we accept the measurement as accurate in both cases, or we reject it as useless for both. We can't pick and choose when it is accurate as we see fit.
The debate on IQ tests is old and pretty much settled, they have too much culturally specific material to be deemed universally useful.
But to take one and compare results later to show decline doesn't have that issue, you could use other tests on language, memory or skills for this.

How many times have you had covid?
Do you understand that lots of people have it without symptoms yet it still can give you long term issues?
 

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
6,025
2,981
113
You really think someone who can sell $250,000 a year in assets, either stocks or property, can't afford to pay taxes on those assets above $250,000?
You think that's unfair while someone like you working as a security guard would have to pay tax on everything they make?
They already paid taxes to generate that wealth.

When is someone else's money ever enough for a communist?
 
Toronto Escorts