AXE THE TAXI do not hear Pee pee complaining about it, as his salary has also been bumped up to $300,000.
AXE THE TAXI do not hear Pee pee complaining about it, as his salary has also been bumped up to $300,000.
they live longer because they do not over eatCubans have a higher life expectancy then American due to their great healthcare. Ok I admit their life is miserable due to their military regime but you need to admit from a healthcare point of you they do good.
So that's why I see boatloads of migrants headed for Cuba. They're coming from the States!
80% of the Canadians Benefit more from the Federal Rebate!!AXE THE TAX
Do you think 80% of Canadians will reduce their carbon footprint as80% of the Canadians Benefit more from the Federal Rebate!!
Climate Change is of utmost importance in this day and age. Ask the Americans who were hit by the most recent cyclones and flooding!!
there has not been an increase in extreme weather events80% of the Canadians Benefit more from the Federal Rebate!!
Climate Change is of utmost importance in this day and age. Ask the Americans who were hit by the most recent cyclones and flooding!!
Bullfeathers drink your Kool-aid80% of the Canadians Benefit more from the Federal Rebate!!
Climate Change is of utmost importance in this day and age. Ask the Americans who were hit by the most recent cyclones and flooding!!
You are a fool.there has not been an increase in extreme weather events
too funny
What the IPCC Actually Says About Extreme Weather
Here are some direct quotes related to specific phenomena:
An increase in heat extremes has emerged or will emerge in the coming three decades in most land regions (high confidence)
[*]There is low confidence in the emergence of heavy precipitation and pluvial and river flood frequency in observations, despite trends that have been found in a few regions
[*]There is low confidence in the emergence of drought frequency in observations, for any type of drought, in all regions.
[*]Observed mean surface wind speed trends are present in many areas, but the emergence of these trends from the interannual natural variability and their attribution to human-induced climate change remains of low confidence due to various factors such as changes in the type and exposure of recording instruments, and their relation to climate change is not established. . . The same limitation also holds for wind extremes (severe storms, tropical cyclones, sand and
dust storms).
[*]
I kind of liked this winter80% of the Canadians Benefit more from the Federal Rebate!!
Climate Change is of utmost importance in this day and age. Ask the Americans who were hit by the most recent cyclones and flooding!!
Let's go by the facts rather than the usual Pee Pee scaremongering!!Do you think 80% of Canadians will reduce their carbon footprint as
a gratitude to the climate tax rebate? And do you believe the other 20%
who receive no rebate or less than their carbon tax payment will have
to cut back expenses on gas?
The carbon tax policy is a scam to win votes from climate sheeple.
Unfortunately there are people who actually believe cyclones and
flooding will diminish in the future as a result of getting more money
back from paying into a ponzi scheme.
British Columbia’s carbon tax started in 2008 at $10 per tonne of carbon emissions, rose by $5 a year, and then paused at $30 in 2012. The tax applied to the burning of fossil fuels, or about 70% of the province’s GHG emissions.
Initially, all revenues were used to finance income-tax cuts and selected tax credits — the carbon tax was “revenue neutral” for the government.
Starting in April 2018, BC’s carbon tax will start rising again by $5 per tonne every year until it hits $50 in 2021. The BC government will use the new revenues to finance initiatives such as public transit and home retrofits to drive further emissions reductions. It will therefore no longer be revenue neutral.
As a result of the carbon tax, annual emissions in BC are 5% to 15% lower than they would otherwise have been. This estimate draws from several analyses (see References for details) each of which isolates the impacts of the carbon tax from other factors.
Just shove that "Kool-aid" BS up your derriere!!Bullfeathers drink your Kool-aid
Expect a summer of more droughts, forest fires that will affect our crops, like it is doing everywhere around the Globe.I kind of liked this winter
there was no snow
and no amount of our money is ever going to make a difference to climate
politicians just give themselves a raise and lough at gullible public
even if Canada shut down completely today
it wouldn't make any difference at all
the biggest polluters will keep on polluting because they get a pass
because most of big US corporations get their stuff from China and India
don't be a full believing that Biden or Trudeau care about the climate.
Let's go by the facts rather than the usual Pee Pee scaremongering!!
The vast majority of experts in this respect have agreed that Canada's greenhouse gas emissions are dropping.
Case studies have been undertaken in the case of BC that were the first jurisdiction to implement it several years ago.
The Greenhouse Gas emissions would have been up to 15% higher had they not imposed this tax in the very first place.
Why should we all not start to take measures to cut back on Greenhouse Gases?
If the Carbon Tax has been implemented by the EU nations and several others around the world , why is it a scam?
The Climate Change is a serious matter to be addressed and every little measure is a step in the right direction.
Obviously, Pee Pee and The conservatives have not disclosed their alternative to it, as they know that they have NONE!!
BC's Emissions have increased marginally. The biggest polluter is Alberta, mainly because they have a Climate Change Denier in charge who has no concern for the environment.Carbon emission in B.C. has been rising. You have to
be a climate science denier to believe a slower growth
rate in carbon emission actually makes any difference.
Isn't that climate scientists have come to the conclusion
that global emission has to be halved by 2030 to avert
CO2 concentration passing the point of no return? And beyond
that point the whole world will no longer be able to escape
from impending climate catastrophe even if emission is
immediately reduced to zero. To say slowing down emission
increase is a good thing is akin to a nicotine addict bragging
how he is progressing to 3 packs instead of 4 packs a day.
Much of the reduction in emission in the west is a result of
power plant phasing out coal and outsourcing of manufacturing
business to China and the developing world. If you truly believe
Europe is the model to follow to reduce emission try this. Let
petrol be taxed at the same rate as it is in Denmark and Norway
and the tax is not to be rebated. I guarantee this will work wonder
if drivers in Ontario are paying the same price per gallon at the
pump as climate-friendly Europeans do.
You have any idea how many millions of tonnes of dirty coalBC's Emissions have increased marginally. The biggest polluter is Alberta, mainly because they have a Climate Change Denier in charge who has no concern for the environment.
..................................
But according to you, it is fine to not bother about Climate Change as anything that we do is not going to make a difference to Climate Change.
Oh well then you will be the one complaining the most when our crops and grocery prices are significantly impacted by the droughts and forest fires.
.........................
Canada is a vast cold countryWhen suggesting the carbon tax won't change the climate (or
something to the same effect) I am questioning the
consistency of our climate policy; I am not stating the reason why
I am opposed to it. I am opposed to carbon tax for the same reason
why majority of Canadians loathe it---the tax sucks.
such a reduction will kill millions and drive billions into abject povertyOur climate leaders declared world is in the
middle of climate crisis, carbon emission has to be reduced
by half in less than a decade and to zero by 2050 to save younger
generation from suffering and dying.
why take the irrational illogical perspective ?Personally I believe that is
fear mongering BS. But for me to accept the carbon tax as a
measure to fight climate change to be reasonable I would look
into the tax from a climate-advocate's perspective.
At what cost?My thinking
is that the tax won't save the climate because it won't likely induce
people to rethink their gas-gluttony in the context of climate change.
The tax does serve the purpose of convincing a fraction of climate
sheeple
you can not 'fight' climate changeTrudeau is doing his job to combat climate change; you
know the people who benefits from the rebates and are naive
enough to believe impacts of droughts and forest fire on crops and
grocery prices are to be lessened by Trudeau and Guilbeault's ponzi
scheme.
you took a strange route to get to the correct conclusionI see no reason why we should go along with the tax to help
with Trudeau's virtue-signalling.
Yes, you are a fool.too funny
king clown calling anyone a 'fool'
What the IPCC Actually Says About Extreme Weather
I promise, you'll be utterly shockedrogerpielkejr.substack.com
has emerged or will emerge ??? a future prediction & their track record is abysmal
time for franky to default to the only thing he understands, character assignation , this time on Roger Pielke Jr , despite the fact these are direct quotes from the IPCC report
note: the Summary for policymakers (which is written by policy makers/ activists ) will not mention all the low confidence and instead push out propaganda