Obsession Massage

Liberals Promise $1 Billion to Provinces for new National School Food Program

JuanGoodman

Goldmember
Jun 29, 2019
4,516
3,869
113
Cubans have a higher life expectancy then American due to their great healthcare. Ok I admit their life is miserable due to their military regime but you need to admit from a healthcare point of you they do good.
they live longer because they do not over eat

or eat at all sometimes

and eat mostly sea food
 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
13,795
2,192
113
Ghawar
80% of the Canadians Benefit more from the Federal Rebate!!
Climate Change is of utmost importance in this day and age. Ask the Americans who were hit by the most recent cyclones and flooding!!
Do you think 80% of Canadians will reduce their carbon footprint as
a gratitude to the climate tax rebate? And do you believe the other 20%
who receive no rebate or less than their carbon tax payment will have
to cut back expenses on gas?

The carbon tax policy is a scam to win votes from climate sheeple.
Unfortunately there are people who actually believe cyclones and
flooding will diminish in the future as a result of getting more money
back from paying into a ponzi scheme.
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,744
3,300
113
80% of the Canadians Benefit more from the Federal Rebate!!
Climate Change is of utmost importance in this day and age. Ask the Americans who were hit by the most recent cyclones and flooding!!
there has not been an increase in extreme weather events

since man started communicating there has always been and likely always be a certain segment of the population who believe the end of the world is nigh

aka the village idiot

1712229012102.png
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,744
3,300
113
too funny
king clown calling anyone a 'fool'




What the IPCC Actually Says About Extreme Weather
Here are some direct quotes related to specific phenomena:
  • An increase in heat extremes has emerged or will emerge in the coming three decades in most land regions (high confidence)
    [*]There is low confidence in the emergence of heavy precipitation and pluvial and river flood frequency in observations, despite trends that have been found in a few regions
    [*]There is low confidence in the emergence of drought frequency in observations, for any type of drought, in all regions.
    [*]Observed mean surface wind speed trends are present in many areas, but the emergence of these trends from the interannual natural variability and their attribution to human-induced climate change remains of low confidence due to various factors such as changes in the type and exposure of recording instruments, and their relation to climate change is not established. . . The same limitation also holds for wind extremes (severe storms, tropical cyclones, sand and
    dust storms
    ).
    [*]
has emerged or will emerge ??? a future prediction & their track record is abysmal


time for franky to default to the only thing he understands, character assignation , this time on Roger Pielke Jr , despite the fact these are direct quotes from the IPCC report

note: the Summary for policymakers (which is written by policy makers/ activists ) will not mention all the low confidence and instead push out propaganda
 

JuanGoodman

Goldmember
Jun 29, 2019
4,516
3,869
113
80% of the Canadians Benefit more from the Federal Rebate!!
Climate Change is of utmost importance in this day and age. Ask the Americans who were hit by the most recent cyclones and flooding!!
I kind of liked this winter

there was no snow

and no amount of our money is ever going to make a difference to climate

politicians just give themselves a raise and lough at gullible public

even if Canada shut down completely today

it wouldn't make any difference at all

the biggest polluters will keep on polluting because they get a pass

because most of big US corporations get their stuff from China and India

don't be a full believing that Biden or Trudeau care about the climate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bazokajoe

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
29,750
7,696
113
Do you think 80% of Canadians will reduce their carbon footprint as
a gratitude to the climate tax rebate? And do you believe the other 20%
who receive no rebate or less than their carbon tax payment will have
to cut back expenses on gas?

The carbon tax policy is a scam to win votes from climate sheeple.
Unfortunately there are people who actually believe cyclones and
flooding will diminish in the future as a result of getting more money
back from paying into a ponzi scheme.
Let's go by the facts rather than the usual Pee Pee scaremongering!!
The vast majority of experts in this respect have agreed that Canada's greenhouse gas emissions are dropping.
Case studies have been undertaken in the case of BC that were the first jurisdiction to implement it several years ago.
The Greenhouse Gas emissions would have been up to 15% higher had they not imposed this tax in the very first place.
Why should we all not start to take measures to cut back on Greenhouse Gases?

British Columbia’s carbon tax started in 2008 at $10 per tonne of carbon emissions, rose by $5 a year, and then paused at $30 in 2012. The tax applied to the burning of fossil fuels, or about 70% of the province’s GHG emissions.
Initially, all revenues were used to finance income-tax cuts and selected tax credits — the carbon tax was “revenue neutral” for the government.
Starting in April 2018, BC’s carbon tax will start rising again by $5 per tonne every year until it hits $50 in 2021. The BC government will use the new revenues to finance initiatives such as public transit and home retrofits to drive further emissions reductions. It will therefore no longer be revenue neutral.
As a result of the carbon tax, annual emissions in BC are 5% to 15% lower than they would otherwise have been. This estimate draws from several analyses (see References for details) each of which isolates the impacts of the carbon tax from other factors.

If the Carbon Tax has been implemented by the EU nations and several others around the world , why is it a scam?
The Climate Change is a serious matter to be addressed and every little measure is a step in the right direction.
Obviously, Pee Pee and The conservatives have not disclosed their alternative to it, as they know that they have NONE!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: bazokajoe

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
29,750
7,696
113
I kind of liked this winter

there was no snow

and no amount of our money is ever going to make a difference to climate

politicians just give themselves a raise and lough at gullible public

even if Canada shut down completely today

it wouldn't make any difference at all

the biggest polluters will keep on polluting because they get a pass

because most of big US corporations get their stuff from China and India

don't be a full believing that Biden or Trudeau care about the climate.
Expect a summer of more droughts, forest fires that will affect our crops, like it is doing everywhere around the Globe.
Vast number of Canadians are concerned with how much more expensive the damage caused by Climate Change will impact us in the future if we just sit back and burn more and more Carbon emitting Fossil Fuels.
I go by the real experts and not the usual conspiracy theorists with regards to the dangers of Climate Change. The only ones gullible are the Climate Change Deniers!!
Well of course the Likes of Pee Pee and Trump will push these conspiracies for their own political gains!!
 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
13,795
2,192
113
Ghawar
Carbon emission in B.C. has been rising. You have to
be a climate science denier to believe a slower growth
rate in carbon emission actually makes any difference.
Isn't that climate scientists have come to the conclusion
that global emission has to be halved by 2030 to avert
CO2 concentration passing the point of no return? And beyond
that point the whole world will no longer be able to escape
from impending climate catastrophe even if emission is
immediately reduced to zero. To say slowing down emission
increase is a good thing is akin to a nicotine addict bragging
how he is progressing to 3 packs instead of 4 packs a day.

Much of the reduction in emission in the west is a result of
power plant phasing out coal and outsourcing of manufacturing
business to China and the developing world. If you truly believe
Europe is the model to follow to reduce emission try this. Let
petrol be taxed at the same rate as it is in Denmark and Norway
and the tax is not to be rebated. I guarantee this will work wonder
if drivers in Ontario are paying the same price per gallon at the
pump as climate-friendly Europeans do.

Let's go by the facts rather than the usual Pee Pee scaremongering!!
The vast majority of experts in this respect have agreed that Canada's greenhouse gas emissions are dropping.
Case studies have been undertaken in the case of BC that were the first jurisdiction to implement it several years ago.
The Greenhouse Gas emissions would have been up to 15% higher had they not imposed this tax in the very first place.
Why should we all not start to take measures to cut back on Greenhouse Gases?




If the Carbon Tax has been implemented by the EU nations and several others around the world , why is it a scam?
The Climate Change is a serious matter to be addressed and every little measure is a step in the right direction.
Obviously, Pee Pee and The conservatives have not disclosed their alternative to it, as they know that they have NONE!!
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
29,750
7,696
113
Carbon emission in B.C. has been rising. You have to
be a climate science denier to believe a slower growth
rate in carbon emission actually makes any difference.
Isn't that climate scientists have come to the conclusion
that global emission has to be halved by 2030 to avert
CO2 concentration passing the point of no return? And beyond
that point the whole world will no longer be able to escape
from impending climate catastrophe even if emission is
immediately reduced to zero. To say slowing down emission
increase is a good thing is akin to a nicotine addict bragging
how he is progressing to 3 packs instead of 4 packs a day.

Much of the reduction in emission in the west is a result of
power plant phasing out coal and outsourcing of manufacturing
business to China and the developing world. If you truly believe
Europe is the model to follow to reduce emission try this. Let
petrol be taxed at the same rate as it is in Denmark and Norway
and the tax is not to be rebated. I guarantee this will work wonder
if drivers in Ontario are paying the same price per gallon at the
pump as climate-friendly Europeans do.
BC's Emissions have increased marginally. The biggest polluter is Alberta, mainly because they have a Climate Change Denier in charge who has no concern for the environment.
BC is still one of the lowest polluter among the Provinces and that is why we have to move towards less carbon emissions sources like Electric Vehicles. But according to you, it is fine to not bother about Climate Change as anything that we do is not going to make a difference to Climate Change. Oh well then you will be the one complaining the most when our crops and grocery prices are significantly impacted by the droughts and forest fires.

Now historically even before we were taking Climate change seriously, nations like Denmark, Norway and The UK were always raising the taxes on petrol and alcohol. It was a source of income. Our problem is that we have not invested in the transport infrastructure to the same extent as The European Nations. You barely need to own a car in the UK as their Underground and transport network is far more extensive than our urban as well as rural areas!!
 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
13,795
2,192
113
Ghawar
BC's Emissions have increased marginally. The biggest polluter is Alberta, mainly because they have a Climate Change Denier in charge who has no concern for the environment.
You have any idea how many millions of tonnes of dirty coal
are exported from B.C. per year? And as recent as 2023 the
climate-change non-deniers there show apparently had no
intention to reduce let alone stop contributing to world's carbon
emission growth.

 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
13,795
2,192
113
Ghawar
..................................
But according to you, it is fine to not bother about Climate Change as anything that we do is not going to make a difference to Climate Change.

When suggesting the carbon tax won't change the climate (or
something to the same effect) I am questioning the
consistency of our climate policy; I am not stating the reason why
I am opposed to it. I am opposed to carbon tax for the same reason
why majority of Canadians loathe it---the tax sucks.

Our climate leaders declared world is in the
middle of climate crisis, carbon emission has to be reduced
by half in less than a decade and to zero by 2050 to save younger
generation from suffering and dying. Personally I believe that is
fear mongering BS. But for me to accept the carbon tax as a
measure to fight climate change to be reasonable I would look
into the tax from a climate-advocate's perspective. My thinking
is that the tax won't save the climate because it won't likely induce
people to rethink their gas-gluttony in the context of climate change.
The tax does serve the purpose of convincing a fraction of climate
sheeple Trudeau is doing his job to combat climate change; you
know the people who benefits from the rebates and are naive
enough to believe impacts of droughts and forest fire on crops and
grocery prices are to be lessened by Trudeau and Guilbeault's ponzi
scheme. I see no reason why we should go along with the tax to help
with Trudeau's virtue-signalling.

Oh well then you will be the one complaining the most when our crops and grocery prices are significantly impacted by the droughts and forest fires.
.........................
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,744
3,300
113
When suggesting the carbon tax won't change the climate (or
something to the same effect) I am questioning the
consistency of our climate policy; I am not stating the reason why
I am opposed to it. I am opposed to carbon tax for the same reason
why majority of Canadians loathe it---the tax sucks.
Canada is a vast cold country
the majority of fossil fuel consumption is non -discretionary
the carbon tax does not 'fight' climate change, it only dives inflation


Our climate leaders declared world is in the
middle of climate crisis, carbon emission has to be reduced
by half in less than a decade and to zero by 2050 to save younger
generation from suffering and dying.
such a reduction will kill millions and drive billions into abject poverty
zero by any date within current life spans is a lunatics fantasy



Personally I believe that is
fear mongering BS. But for me to accept the carbon tax as a
measure to fight climate change to be reasonable I would look
into the tax from a climate-advocate's perspective.
why take the irrational illogical perspective ?

My thinking
is that the tax won't save the climate because it won't likely induce
people to rethink their gas-gluttony in the context of climate change.
The tax does serve the purpose of convincing a fraction of climate
sheeple
At what cost?


Trudeau is doing his job to combat climate change; you
know the people who benefits from the rebates and are naive
enough to believe impacts of droughts and forest fire on crops and
grocery prices are to be lessened by Trudeau and Guilbeault's ponzi
scheme.
you can not 'fight' climate change
no more than you can fight day turning to night

nature changes the climate, always has, always will

there has not been an increase in extreme weather events ( see post 42)
the incremental CO2 (plant food) has aided in the increase in world wide crop yields

acreage of forest fires has dramatically decreased relative to 100 years ago


I see no reason why we should go along with the tax to help
with Trudeau's virtue-signalling.
you took a strange route to get to the correct conclusion
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
93,363
23,246
113
too funny
king clown calling anyone a 'fool'








has emerged or will emerge ??? a future prediction & their track record is abysmal


time for franky to default to the only thing he understands, character assignation , this time on Roger Pielke Jr , despite the fact these are direct quotes from the IPCC report

note: the Summary for policymakers (which is written by policy makers/ activists ) will not mention all the low confidence and instead push out propaganda
Yes, you are a fool.
You don't understand the science or the language used by scientists to communicate projections with confidence levels.
This is way above your comprehension levels, you get the basics wrong daily, like your inability to understand the greenhouse effect.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts