What?
You should vote out the group that will actually respond to your pressure and put in the one that won't?
That's an
amazing political strategy.
And you wonder why I criticize your political analysis.
Sure, follow the logic, valcazar.
Option a) you don't vote out the party that can change so they stay in power and see no reason to ever stop backing genocide.
Option b) you vote out the party that can change, get 4 years of another party that backs genocide then can vote for a party that has to change and not support genocide, thereby ending genocide support.
Your plan is just back genocide because its 'practical', its no different than backing a racist, corrupt, rapist because you think he'll lower your taxes so its 'practical'.
Yes, Trump and his movement is much more dangerous at this time.
Why you think that's an argument for putting him in power escapes me.
Is he more dangerous?
He's way more senile, has already fucked over the SCOTUS and will spend the next 4 years trying to overturn court decisions against himself and whining about Clinton and Obama.
Never Again.
That's all its about.
Never Again.
Biden still has uncommitted troubles.