Then the conclusion must be that you are an idiot.
You have no facts to counter my argument, so you need to resort to insults.
A ceasefire means both sides stop killing....
....eventually. The ceasefire has to be negotiated. A Hamas surrender and return of the hostages means both sides stop killing IMMEDIATELY.
That's the fastest way to end the killing and return the hostages.
False. A Hamas surrender and return of the hostages is much faster. It is physically impossible for a multi-lateral negotiation between parties who don't trust each other to be faster than a unilateral surrender. If you can't understand that, then who is the actual idiot. Please explain the step by step process and the timeline of each step of how a cease fire that needs to be negotiated is faster than a unilateral surrender. I'd like to hear an intelligent and truthful response.
A ceasefire wouldn't end the genocide through starvation and disease, which is what you want.
I never said that or even implied that.
On the other hand, I used your words to back up my claim that you support more civilian deaths. I did not lie regarding what you said should happen. I was accurate. Go ahead and use my words to prove that I want more deaths. Do not lie about what I've said.