INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE: LATEST

Klatuu

Well-known member
Dec 31, 2022
5,738
3,356
113
I see you have trouble with the chronological order of events in your haste to re-write history. Let’s try this again in larger font.


Background and escalation
Prior to the start of the war, attacks conducted against Israel by fledgling Palestinian guerrilla groups based in Syria, Lebanon, and Jordan had increased, leading to costly Israeli reprisals.
Yes, chronology, and in this case logic, is missing. Your own source has the war starting on June 5th. You know, the date Israel launched a massive surprise attack on its neighbors.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,861
22,255
113

whynot888

Well-known member
Nov 30, 2007
3,581
1,491
113
But will the US reverse their decision?
Will they listen to the UN report on rapes by IDF?
Will they listen to the genocide charges at the ICJ?

Your still missing the point!
The more you drag and rely on the courts or a ceasefire, the more deaths of Pali's.
Had Hamas surrendered a few months ago, the death toll would of been substantial lower. The ONLY way for this to stop is a Hamas surrender not a ceasefire, and if a ceasefire does occur down the road, you have lost more than you've gain. Fuck your apartheid, genocide and zionist bullshit, you have to stop the bleeding before you think about those concerns. You should really think about at this time and stage what is more important. The sacrifice of Palestinian lives or protecting a terrorist group.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
51,708
10,107
113
Toronto
That's the best you've got?
That I posted a tweet with a clearly edited photo and didn't note that it was photoshopped?
I didn't say the photo was not photoshopped, did I?
So clearly I didn't lie.
You posted a doctored picture.
You did not disclose that it was doctored.

That's a lie. End of story.

Regardless, your reputation is cemented. Start a thread and ask everyone what they think about how truthful you are.

Have you ever lied on the board? (No answer is an admission that you have lied.)
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
51,708
10,107
113
Toronto

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
51,708
10,107
113
Toronto
Your still missing the point!
The more you drag and rely on the courts or a ceasefire, the more deaths of Pali's.
Had Hamas surrendered a few months ago, the death toll would of been substantial lower. The ONLY way for this to stop is a Hamas surrender not a ceasefire, and if a ceasefire does occur down the road, you have lost more than you've gain. Fuck your apartheid, genocide and zionist bullshit, you have to stop the bleeding before you think about those concerns. You should really think about at this time and stage what is more important. The sacrifice of Palestinian lives or protecting a terrorist group.
What is most important for frank, and Hamas, is that a maximum number of civilians die and that is strictly for propaganda purposes. The ability to demonize Jews outweighs any number of deaths. When he says he cares about the civilians he is lying. As you say, the fact that he is happy to wait an indefinite amount of time for a ceasefire as opposed to calling for a surrender is irrefutable proof that Gazan lives are irrelevant to him.
 

Klatuu

Well-known member
Dec 31, 2022
5,738
3,356
113
You posted a doctored picture.
You did not disclose that it was doctored.

That's a lie. End of story.

Regardless, your reputation is cemented. Start a thread and ask everyone what they think about how truthful you are.

Have you ever lied on the board? (No answer is an admission that you have lied.)
Are you actually stating you didn’t know this was a parody picture, sad Shack?
 

Klatuu

Well-known member
Dec 31, 2022
5,738
3,356
113
What is most important for frank, and Hamas, is that a maximum number of civilians die and that is strictly for propaganda purposes. The ability to demonize Jews outweighs any number of deaths. When he says he cares about the civilians he is lying. As you say, the fact that he is happy to wait an indefinite amount of time for a ceasefire as opposed to calling for a surrender is irrefutable proof that Gazan lives are irrelevant to him.
Are you using antisemitism again to cover up the indefensible?
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,454
6,703
113
No, basketcase.
...
Sad that you've completely given up on the idea of responding to posts and instead just rely on angry spamming.

I asked him for evidence his claim that Egypt's blockade of the Tiran Straits didn't happen. Do you have anything to add to that discussion other than your obsessive ramblings?
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,454
6,703
113
The attack was PRE-EMPTIVE. PER ISRAEL. What part of pre-emptive, do you not get?
So you admit you just made up that there was no blockade. Egypt's Blockade was an act of war and under international law, casus belli.





It is not a strawman.
This is what you said.
Oh you mean Israel is dying to make peace with the Palestinians and the Palestinians are the ones who are not ready? That is a load of stinking Zionist bullshit, if there ever was one.
You are claiming that Palestinians leaders and the Palestinian public overwhelmingly rejecting any kind of peace is the fault of Israel, completely ignoring the desires of Palestinians and the fact that their leaders have repeatedly rejected any kind of peace.



Those Jews in 1919, did not have a right to be there...
By those standards, you don't have a right to be in Canada.

Those Jews in 1919 were there either for 1000+ years or were legal immigrants under the Ottomans. Are you saying that the Ottomans were not capable of determining their own policies or are you too ignorant to know that the British Mandate didn't start until 1920? Or is it just they're Jews and you think they should have no right to be anywhere they aren't liked. The Ottomans allowed Jews to be there. The Brits (under UN/League of Nation mandates) allowed Jews to be there. Why do you think you have the right to overrule the legally constituted governments of those times?

South Asians have no right to be in Canada other than Canada's government allowing immigrants and providing them the same rights as any other citizen. Canada's indigenous people sure as shit didn't invite you so you are in the exact same situation of the Jews you want ethnically cleansed.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: Leimonis and Klatuu

Klatuu

Well-known member
Dec 31, 2022
5,738
3,356
113
So you admit you just made up that there was no blockade. Egypt's Blockade was an act of war and under international law, casus belli.






This is what you said.

You are claiming that Palestinians leaders and the Palestinian public overwhelmingly rejecting any kind of peace is the fault of Israel, completely ignoring the desires of Palestinians and the fact that their leaders have repeatedly rejected any kind of peace.




By those standards, you don't have a right to be in Canada.

Those Jews in 1919 were there either for 1000+ years or were legal immigrants under the Ottomans. Are you saying that the Ottomans were not capable of determining their own policies or are you too ignorant to know that the British Mandate didn't start until 1920? Or is it just they're Jews and you think they should have no right to be anywhere they aren't liked. The Ottomans allowed Jews to be there. The Brits (under UN/League of Nation mandates) allowed Jews to be there. Why do you think you have the right to overrule the legally constituted governments of those times?

South Asians have no right to be in Canada other than Canada's government allowing immigrants and providing them the same rights as any other citizen. Canada's indigenous people sure as shit didn't invite you so you are in the exact same situation of the Jews you want ethnically cleansed.
Just a cavalcade of non sequiturs.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,861
22,255
113
Your still missing the point!
The more you drag and rely on the courts or a ceasefire, the more deaths of Pali's.
Had Hamas surrendered a few months ago, the death toll would of been substantial lower. The ONLY way for this to stop is a Hamas surrender not a ceasefire, and if a ceasefire does occur down the road, you have lost more than you've gain. Fuck your apartheid, genocide and zionist bullshit, you have to stop the bleeding before you think about those concerns. You should really think about at this time and stage what is more important. The sacrifice of Palestinian lives or protecting a terrorist group.
Bullshit.
If Hamas had surrendered Israel would have continued the genocide to kill everyone they claimed was Hamas.
Then they'd move on to the West Bank, where they are now attacking.
Then they'd start a war with Lebanon, which they have been attacking for months now.

Israel is not peaceful.
Surrender just means more genocide.

Only ceasefire stops the violence and returns the hostages.

 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,861
22,255
113
You posted a doctored picture.
You did not disclose that it was doctored.

That's a lie. End of story.

Regardless, your reputation is cemented. Start a thread and ask everyone what they think about how truthful you are.

Have you ever lied on the board? (No answer is an admission that you have lied.)
That's idiotic.
Really, really stupid.

Are you really arguing that you are so daft you thought the US ambassador voted at the UNSC with her hand covered in blood?

What next, you're going to say you think this is real and therefore I'm lying about something?
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts