Coming from a guy who thinks ceasefire has to come first before releasing hostages . there won't be a need for ceasefire if they didn't rook hostages first Franky.. see how stupid you sound?
‘Jew List’ published by Australian pro-Palestinian activists forces families into hiding
- Thread starter canada-man
- Start date
I do support that but unfortunately I don't have Hamas on speed dial and they don't care what I think. If Hamas refuses to surrender do you think that makes it ok to continue the genocide against civilians?
So you're saying that Hamas can attack Israel but Israel is not allowed to do anything back.
You have now lost your marbles along with your morals. You lost those a long time ago.
Oct.7 was a terrorist act of aggression. And Israel is allowed to defend itself.
You are projecting.
How many Palestinians have died since Jan.1 while you've been waiting for a ceasefire. Please look into your crystal and tell us how long it will take for this ceasefire to be declared.
So, let me see if I understand this correctly. “I am unwilling to protest Hamas war crimes here. Nor go there to protest so speed dials are immaterial. I understand nothing short of “victory” is going to stop them.”
So instead I am going to stop Israel
But when questioned. “ I don’t pick sides”
Is that about right?
Last edited:
That's like saying that a prison guard cannot defend himself if he's attacked by an inmate.
This is why nobody takes anything you say seriously. You are insane.
Frankfooter said:
Hamas gave terms for a ceasefire and the return of the hostages.
OK. I'll give terms for a ceasefire between you and me. You stop posting in the politics section about Israel and I'll take back all the bad things I said about you.
That seems reasonable to me and proves that I am serious. Do you accept?
Hamas gave terms for a ceasefire and the return of the hostages.
OK. I'll give terms for a ceasefire between you and me. You stop posting in the politics section about Israel and I'll take back all the bad things I said about you.
That seems reasonable to me and proves that I am serious. Do you accept?
I can accept that. But you are still admitting that waiting for a ceasefire will cost many more Gazan lives than a surrender by Hamas.
As long as we remove the word continue, I agree. Genocide is never OK. Genocide by Israel has not been proven. It is simply the opinion of some people.
You just justified Hamas taking hostages, rich.
Saying that there would be no need for a ceasefire without them justifies Hamas taking them.
Without them it would just be genocide with no reason to stop.
As it is, we are just about to hear whether Netanyahu can be stopped.
That's the Geneva Conventions, shack.
International law.
Deal with it.
Now you're backing a pariah state in the middle of a genocide.
That blue star is going to look like white hoods.
Yes, prison guards in Canada cannot kill all the prisoners if they attack the guards.
Good point.
You aren't trustworthy.
You lie constantly.
Why would I accept any agreement with you?
More words salad? Keep trying your hardest. If hamas didn't attack and took hostages...Israel would bomb the shit out of Gaza....now if they are to release hostages, ceasefire would be achievable....common sense seems far out of reach for you....
Egypt building a wall.
abcnews.go.com
Satellite photos show Egypt building a wall near Gaza Strip
Egypt is building a wall and is leveling land near its border with the Gaza Strip ahead of a planned Israeli offensive targeting the border city of Rafah
abcnews.go.com
No, rich.
For 75 years Israel has been stealing Palestine, this is just a more extreme version of the same crap.
Thousands take part in pro-Palestine protests across the world
Protests took place in major world cities, including London, Madrid and Istanbul.
And in my opinion if it's been 75 years (which it hasn't), IMO they should be used to it my now.
International law says that a country has the right to defend itself. There is no proviso that says "unless the aggressor is in occupied territory". Your line about "protecting the occupied peoples" is negated once those peoples launch a terrorist attack. Just like a prison guard gets to protect himself.
Deal with it.
No it isn't.
International law says that a country has the right to defend itself. There is no proviso that says "unless the aggressor is in occupied territory". Your line about "protecting the occupied peoples" is negated once those peoples launch a terrorist attack. Just like a prison guard gets to protect himself.
Deal with it.
I've repeatedly posted the statement by the UN Rapporteur stating the law and Israel's duty under the Geneva Conventions.
Deal with it.
You back war crimes, genocide, apartheid and just about every single evil act you accuse Hamas of doing but by a scale of 100.
Netanyahu is a terrorist war criminal.
Hated by everyone including his own people.
Except the zionists here.
How's that bullshitbl you're eating today? You can't make up your mind...Arabs from Palestine left during the attack on Israel, allowed to comeback in...and somehow its Israel's fault.. don't start a war you can't win...don't take hostages and you don't need to cry for ceasefire....hamas doesnt want ceasefire....they want mor3 Palestinians to suffer...No, rich.
For 75 years Israel has been stealing Palestine, this is just a more extreme version of the same crap.
Thousands take part in pro-Palestine protests across the world
Protests took place in major world cities, including London, Madrid and Istanbul.www.aljazeera.com
