yeah sure...more distraction from your hypocrisy. Funny...I can almost make it happen on demand it's so predictable.
E Jean Carroll woman of the year!
- Thread starter dirtydaveiii
- Start date
Realizing your own hypocrisy must be a terrible thing for you to come to terms with. Sad really.
I say this respectfully and the appellate court may agree with you but you do not understand legal procedure. The defence wanted to relitigate the issue about eherth he has assaulted her. That issue had already been decided and this was just an assessment of damages. His remedy if he didn’t like the previous decision was to appeal which I believe he has. But it is not open to any litigant to relitigate the issue of liability in an assessment trial. Her statements are just legally wrong and she is playing to him and his base. If she is right the appellate court will set it aside. Time will tell. I do think they will reduce the award.
Facts before fiction
when you wake up in the morning chant the above bolded line 100X before you start your day.
you're welcome!
There is no fiction in your hypocrisy. We've already established that fact.
Nah...usually when someone is convicted of rape they go to jail. Not the case here.
Care to keep distracting?
Being appealed. So by your logic nothing has been truly confirmed right? In fact, by your logic the whole thing could be thrown out altogether so we should just assume innocense.
I'll leave that with you...you can get in your daily exercise by trying to twist yourself into a pretzel to avoid exposing your hypocrisy even further.
Except that rump admitted he rapes women in the audio tape presented as evidence in trial.
His guilt is confirmed, the appeal is only about how much he has to pay.
Unfortunately for your narrative what guys say to each other in a locker room doesn't qualify as a rape conviction.
But maybe one day if your dream of a communist society comes true that may very well be the case and we can round up millions of men everywhere.
Last edited:
The court ruled he is a rapist who slanders his victims and ordered him to pay out $83 million.
That's your hero?
Kirk, the judge disallowed much of Trump's "defence" because it was res judicata from the first trial.
Mitchy is working on it. I believe he's in the process of calling Frank Leo to sell his home and calling in his pension plan to help poor old DJT out.So here is a question for anyone who knows???......
How much of that $83.3M is covered by Trump's insurance policies?????
You are the first to not accept a court ruling when it goes against your narrative and here you are accepting a court ruling that's in line with your narrative.
Oops...you tripped over your hypocrisy again.
We are talking about your backing of a rapist who has to pay $83 million for slandering his victim.
Stop trying to change the channel.
Why do you keep backing a rapist?
Shouldn't even a legit accusation of rape make you question your support?
And $83 million?
