INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE: LATEST
- Thread starter niniveh
- Start date
Nope.
but what’s been accomplished?
Other than protest abroad, some violence abroad potentially more ill will towards Palestine?
but what’s been accomplished?
Other than protest abroad, some violence abroad potentially more ill will towards Palestine?
Buy who's being g presumptuous here? There are so many factors to consider yet the jew haters are so fast to call it genocide....
OK, but that is you explicitly acknowledging that you are going beyond what the court actually said in order to ascribe additional meaning to the decision.
As long as we are clear on that.
I'm actually surprised you haven't included the argument that an explicit determination of genocide requires an incredibly high burden of proof and is very narrowly defined by the ICJ.
Since it is very likely if the case proceeds on the merits the ICJ won't be able to find for genocide, you can argue that this "plausible" finding was the most they were ever going to get and so this must be read as the real decision.
Again, that would be you explicitly going beyond what the court said, but if you are going to do so you may as well marshal as many arguments as you can.
Might also add wasting 7.5 million of tax payers money, morons.
Managing demonstrations since the Israel-Hamas war has cost $7.5 million: Toronto police
Toronto police say that it has cost $7.5 million to manage hundreds of demonstrations that have taken place since the start of the Israel-Hamas war on Oct. 7.
www.cp24.com
Craig Murray:
Israel says the International Court of Justice is antisemitic
The United Nations is antisemitic
The World Health Organisation is antisemitic
The 18.22 train from Stockport to Oldham is antisemitic
So are squirrels. Especially the red ones. But the grey ones too.
Kauty, there was no finding of genocide.
No finding of genocide. No finding of genocide. No finding of genocide.
Say the phrase to yourself as often as you need to before the light of understanding dawns on your face.
No finding of genocide does not mean that there was a finding of genocide. Any more than finding someone was not guilty is a conviction. Courts don't work that way.
You can't have it both ways, though.
That you and many others are reading it as an implicit finding of genocide, while acknowledging that the court didn't actually say that is fine.
You're very clear that you are reading into it and why you are going beyond what the court said.
But you can't then say people are being weird for saying there was no finding of genocide when you acknowledge that very fact yourself.
But you can't then turn around and say that anyone who says that the court didn't find for genocide - a thing you acknowledge as factually true - is just blinded by bias.
Most of the Arabs already have peace treaties and already prefer Israel to the Palestinians. Your wish is not going to happen.
Just a finding that its plausible that Israel is committing genocide, that they were ordered to stop it and take care of the people of Gaza and report back in a month on their progress.
Instead they killed about 500 people in a day and tried to shut down the one organization feeding 2.2 million starving people.
The ICJ case is a slam dunk now.
Zionism = genocide.
You would prefer the adult say 'It is plausible you are committing xyz so I therefore order you not to commit xyz, arrest those inciting xyz and report back in a month on your progress or face discipline'.
Sometimes your requests for accuracy come across as a bit pendantic.
Sometimes they are necessary, sometimes they strive to obfuscate.
But I’m deranged, can’t communicate etc etc etc, for trying to get you , Franky ( lost cause here so don’t care) etc. To think about that, politicians and politics and challenging “the world”……..
“/laugh laugh laugh”
mission accomplished obviously.
Last edited:
Why resort to paraphrasing/hate speech when the actual wording is available:
WHAT DID THE COURT RULE?
The court ordered Israel to refrain from any acts that could fall under the Genocide Convention and to ensure its troops commit no genocidal acts in Gaza.
Your paraphrase is a joke. Clearly from a raging anti-Semite.
The very next day Israel killed about 500 people and moved to stop aid reaching 2.2 starving people through attacks on the UNRWA.
Israel is refusing to abide by the ICJ ruling.
Israel will be charged with genocide at the ICJ.
Weapon licenses for Israelis extended
Far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir says he signed regulations that would extend the validity of permits for Israelis to carry firearms by six months.
