Israel at war

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
51,424
9,979
113
Toronto
Just becuse the Pali reproduction rate exceeded the slaughter does not make it non genocideal.
If Israel was actually intent on genocide, they could easily overcome the Gazan birth rate.

By that same token the Israeli pop is still growing so they should be ok with the few that Hamas kills right?
And U.S. shouldn't have had a problem with 9/11. And if you had 3 children and only 1 was murdered, your family would still have grown. What an inane argument.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
51,424
9,979
113
Toronto
So the Cheney doctrine, then?
"If there is even a 1% chance we must treat it as a 100% chance," is that it?
Under that criteria, you are saying Israel should bomb Gaza forever, right?
You can never be sure that the risk is zero, so bomb.
That's a really far leap. I gave no recommendations. I asked a question.

Of course.
Hamas is pretty horrific.
But "Hamas surrenders" doesn't solve your problem, does it?
Since they can always start attacks again, you have to keep on bombing.
That is not the point. The point is that as soon as Hamas surrenders, Palestinian lives are saved immediately. Isn't that what everybody's protesting about? "SAVE THE PALESTINIANS." There is no faster way to save lives.

So there have been no elections, therefore there should never be elections?
Or is it elections happen when the bombing stops, which is never?
Or is it "no elections, just rule by Israel"?
Where do you come up with this stuff? Where do these assumptions come from?

The situation in Gaza will never improve until Hamas is gone. Something has to change otherwise the same result will keep occurring.

Again - as I mentioned earlier in the thread - what is the end game here besides "keep bombing"?
Hamas surrender.

So no criteria or plan, just "Israel will stop when it feels like it"?
To a certain extent. But they will stop if Hamas surrenders. If Hamas keeps fighting, Israel will have no choice but to keep it up. Actually, Hamas is in control of how Israel approaches things.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
51,424
9,979
113
Toronto
Wait, you are telling me they havent even occupied all of gaza city??? Man this is worse than i thought. No wonder israel changed tactics, clearly whatever they did was not working.
Except they keep progressing in wiping out Hamas. Everything is working. Hamas has made 0 gains.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
51,424
9,979
113
Toronto
OMG man jjust google the effin arab league. There the 22 nations in there. Who says Iran is not allowed to peace keep. They will be under UN command and be entrusted with keeping the Palis in check along with other arab nations.
Laughable. Iran wants Israel gone. Iran funds Hamas, Hezbollah and Houthis.

The UN and all Arab countries are anti-Israeli. They're biased. That's because of "Zionism and apartheid", right? Israel is evil, right? They won't protect Israel in to keep peace.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
51,424
9,979
113
Toronto
You know the PLO did recognise Israels right to exist. And that is one reason Israel funded Hamas to take control of Gaza. That way they can say "we don't have a negotiating partner" Israel has NEVER wanted peace. After all, when a PM came to power that was serious about peace they murdered him. Israel will never get serious about peace until the cost of war becomes untenable. Then they will agee to peace and then over the next 20-40 years become radical and the whole shit show wil start again.
Every negotiated peace has been broken by the Palestinians.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zobetron

Klatuu

Well-known member
Dec 31, 2022
5,668
3,314
113
Laughable. Iran wants Israel gone. Iran funds Hamas, Hezbollah and Houthis.

The UN and all Arab countries are anti-Israeli. They're biased. That's because of "Zionism and apartheid", right? Israel is evil, right? They won't protect Israel in to keep peace.
Thumbsucking
 
Toronto Escorts