I'd say more its about time as opposed to good job. But I guess its better late than never. 800K foreign student permits in our colleges and universities. This has been steadily rising since 2014. And the majority of them go back to their home country after graduation. This has been an abysmal policy failureSo the answer is no, you have always voted Conservative.
Here
you go K, have a good read
Is Canada Really So Immigrant-Friendly?
Trudeau’s ambitious plan to increase immigration is facing pushback from the left and right.foreignpolicy.com
The federal government has come into the foreign student issue, why are you not saying GOOD JOB JUSTIN?
Since the Province couldn't get their act together on Foreign students, the Federal government took action, COME K, say it, GOOD JOB JUSTIN
Miller to provinces: If you can't fix international student rackets then feds will
Colleges and universities that issue acceptance letters to international students will have to confirm all of them with the federal immigration department as Canada moves to crack down on fraud.www.ctvnews.ca
GO JUSTIN AND THE LIBERALS GOOOOOOO
- Thread starter squeezer
- Start date
I corrected your incorrect assumptions and you respond with something completely different without acknowledging that you were mistaken.
I'm glad you voted for DoFo but your sentiments say otherwise. Are you making that up?
Policy failure yes, cash grab for college's and universities hell ya.
Wrong.
Feds have final say as to who enters the country.
But good attempt at twisting reality to suit your narrative as wrong as you may be.
Read my son, read. Reading is your friend.
ps....going forth, you have officially been disowned and are no longer my son. Read away while I go take a shower to get rid of the eek factor.
Since 2016, immigration is primarily the responsibility of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC). Under the British North America Act, constitutional responsibility for immigration is divided between the provincial and federal governments.Hey dad, you need to do some reading yourself...the education institution has to apply to the Feds for approval for any foreign student. Why do you think that is? Who has ultimate authority?Read my son, read. Reading is your friend.
ps....going forth, you have officially been disowned and are no longer my son. Read away while I go take a shower to get rid of the eek factor.
I know, I know, you're desperately trying to recover from your epic fail so just accept the facts and take your losses like a man.
https://www.canada.ca/en/immigratio...-student-program-aim-to-protect-students.html
The Feds approve the applications submitted by the institutions. i.e. they have final say. The province doesn't. Is that too difficult to comprehend?
https://www.canada.ca/en/immigratio...-student-program-aim-to-protect-students.html
Abortion as Essential Health Care and the Critical Role Your Practice Can Play in Protecting Abortion Access - PMC
Obstetrician–gynecologists have both the skills and the knowledge to incorporate abortion into their clinical practices, and our patients deserve a specialty-wide concerted effort to deliver comprehensive reproductive health care at this critical ...
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Oh shit, the wrong article, don't take it the wrong way man!
You still miss the point, it is the Provincial government that controls the flow and you are quoting an article I already mentioned how Justin; 's Liberal government had to step in to put a noose around the provincial government's lack of controlling the flow.
Son, before the official disowning celebrations take place, please for once in your life be the man I dream of you growing into and say
"Justin for PM 2025"
I am amused that you posted a link to a new program where the feds will oversee the provinces and their excessive reliance on foreign students. As well as clamp down on colleges like Conestega.
This will start this month to fix DoFo's mess.
Alberta gets the highest carbon rebates but they are brainwashed on how bad these rebates are.Read my children read
Exempting gas from carbon pricing would not improve affordability
Exempting certain fossil fuels from the federal carbon price would decrease the revenue generated by that policy—and reduce the size of rebates returned to households (known as Climate Action Incentive Payments).
The table below illustrates our estimated change in annual Climate Action Incentive rebates for a family of three. As the estimates illustrate, exempting natural gas and heating oil from carbon pricing would reduce household rebates across the country, leaving most households worse off than with the carbon price, and associated rebates, in place.
Annual change in household rebates for a family of three (based on 2023 rebates)
As the figure below illustrates, exempting gas and oil use in buildings from carbon pricing would reduce income in all but the highest income groups. Moreover, it is regressive, given that the equally applied rebates are most important to lower-income households.
Oil, PUT DOWN THAT ruler, and listen carefully!!
HOW MANY COUNTRIES currently implement a carbon tax?
NO, RICARDO, not just Canada. The answer is 27 countries, YES 27. Can you now name them, please?? Go ahead, I will wait.
So you admit you were wrong? Ok.
The Feds have always had jurisdiction over who enters the country for whatever purpose. They are just fixing the mess they couldn't previously control as well as other things leading up to the next election.
Ok dad let's make it real simple for you like that 2-button t.v. remote I gave you for your birthday...Abortion as Essential Health Care and the Critical Role Your Practice Can Play in Protecting Abortion Access - PMC
Obstetrician–gynecologists have both the skills and the knowledge to incorporate abortion into their clinical practices, and our patients deserve a specialty-wide concerted effort to deliver comprehensive reproductive health care at this critical ...
Oh shit, the wrong article, don't take it the wrong way man!
You still miss the point, it is the Provincial government that controls the flow and you are quoting an article I already mentioned how Justin; 's Liberal government had to step in to put a noose around the provincial government's lack of controlling the flow.
Son, before the official disowning celebrations take place, please for once in your life be the man I dream of you growing into and say
"Justin for PM 2025"
The educational institutions can solicit foreign students and accept applications, etc...but to get into the country, for any purpose, the Feds have ultimate control. That has always been the case for anyone entering Canada for any purpose.
So the Feds are fixing their own problem.
What part of that causes you confusion?
No, the programme you pointed to is brand new to fix the provinces stuffing universities with foreign students to cover they funding cutbacks.
Provinces have never been able and can't allow people into the country. The feds do. Regardless of what program is run by the provinces, feds have to let someone in. They control it. You are bending reality to suit your narrative and it's not working for you.
Have you been eating your crayons again?
I might not agree with Frankie on Hamas but on other points, he's bang on so I will rest on Frankie's reply. Please see below son and only because there is a delay at the Office of disowning a Delinquent son.
Taking money away from Canadians and return more of it
back to people in Alberta. What is the point of it? Wouldn't
it be better to spare them such nuisance of money transfer
back and forth?
Neither of you have shown any proof that provinces or educational institutions have final say and make the decision to allow anyone to enter the country. Zilch.
Why?
Because the Feds have sole authority to do that. Always have, always will.
Care to prove me wrong?
But what is the direct and indirect cost of this?Read my children read
Exempting gas from carbon pricing would not improve affordability
Exempting certain fossil fuels from the federal carbon price would decrease the revenue generated by that policy—and reduce the size of rebates returned to households (known as Climate Action Incentive Payments).
The table below illustrates our estimated change in annual Climate Action Incentive rebates for a family of three. As the estimates illustrate, exempting natural gas and heating oil from carbon pricing would reduce household rebates across the country, leaving most households worse off than with the carbon price, and associated rebates, in place.
Annual change in household rebates for a family of three (based on 2023 rebates)
As the figure below illustrates, exempting gas and oil use in buildings from carbon pricing would reduce income in all but the highest income groups. Moreover, it is regressive, given that the equally applied rebates are most important to lower-income households.
Oil, PUT DOWN THAT ruler, and listen carefully!!
HOW MANY COUNTRIES currently implement a carbon tax?
NO, RICARDO, not just Canada. The answer is 27 countries, YES 27. Can you now name them, please?? Go ahead, I will wait.
Then there are questions about the future of these taxes.
