Steeles Royal

Israel at war

Previous Thread Next Thread
F

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
92,233
22,501
113
Leimonis said:
here's some helpful advise about this situation that chatgpt generated:


ChatGPT
Engaging in an argument with someone who is behaving irrationally or appears to be mentally unwell can be challenging and may not always be productive. It's essential to consider the context and your own well-being. Here are a few things to keep in mind:
  1. Futility of Reasoning: Individuals experiencing mental health challenges may not be receptive to rational arguments or logic. Their thought processes might be distorted, making it difficult for them to engage in a coherent and productive discussion.
  2. Emotional Toll: Arguing with someone who is irrational can be emotionally draining and may escalate the situation. It's important to prioritize your own mental health and well-being.
  3. Seeking Professional Help: If the person's behavior is concerning or poses a risk to themselves or others, it's advisable to involve professionals, such as mental health professionals, counselors, or authorities who can intervene appropriately.
  4. Setting Boundaries: If you decide to engage, set clear boundaries for the discussion. Avoid personal attacks, remain calm, and focus on specific behaviors or concerns rather than attempting to address the overall irrationality.
  5. Knowing When to Stop: If the conversation becomes unproductive or begins to escalate, it might be best to disengage. Continuing the argument may not lead to a resolution and could exacerbate the situation
Click to expand...
I'm sure that only an AI will give you support in your defence of genocide.

The genocide won't last that much longer, Biden is cracking. Yesterday he accused Israel of war crimes and called Netanyahu's government 'extremist'.
Now he's got his own staff protesting out in front of the White House.


https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1735131407838531779

The only thing keeping him going, it appears, is a similar case of racism to you, shack, basketcase and mandrill.
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1735125244971810860
 
F

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
92,233
22,501
113
richaceg said:
Other than you and hamas supporters....Trudeau and Biden has not called Israel terrorists...
Click to expand...
The rest of the world has.

CNN went into Gaza yesterday, the first western journalist to visit in two months. Israel has, of course, killed off about 60 Palestinian journalists as they intentionally tried to stop reports from getting out.

Its only going to get worse as reports like this hit the MSM and you become someone who supports killing and maiming children.
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1735177271579742414
 
F

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
92,233
22,501
113
shack said:
In the meantime, The Lancet is not a valid to source to refer to in terms of validating numbers in a war zone. They are out of their area of expertise.

Seeing as you did not address my last post but simply pivoted to accuser, you finally agree that the Lancet is not a valid source.

You cannot produce a proper scientific study that they are studying.
Click to expand...
Repeating a stupid argument over and over again isn't winning a debate.
The Lancet looked at how Gaza hospitals report deaths, that is totally within their field of study.
Unless you take the time to read this study and debate its merit I'll consider this argument over and that you have once again just tried to hasbara troll your way through.

Here's the study, if you won't read it you have to stop criticizing it.
 
Dutch Oven

Dutch Oven

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2019
7,016
2,496
113
Leimonis said:
here's some helpful advise about this situation that chatgpt generated:


ChatGPT
Engaging in an argument with someone who is behaving irrationally or appears to be mentally unwell can be challenging and may not always be productive. It's essential to consider the context and your own well-being. Here are a few things to keep in mind:
  1. Futility of Reasoning: Individuals experiencing mental health challenges may not be receptive to rational arguments or logic. Their thought processes might be distorted, making it difficult for them to engage in a coherent and productive discussion.
  2. Emotional Toll: Arguing with someone who is irrational can be emotionally draining and may escalate the situation. It's important to prioritize your own mental health and well-being.
  3. Seeking Professional Help: If the person's behavior is concerning or poses a risk to themselves or others, it's advisable to involve professionals, such as mental health professionals, counselors, or authorities who can intervene appropriately.
  4. Setting Boundaries: If you decide to engage, set clear boundaries for the discussion. Avoid personal attacks, remain calm, and focus on specific behaviors or concerns rather than attempting to address the overall irrationality.
  5. Knowing When to Stop: If the conversation becomes unproductive or begins to escalate, it might be best to disengage. Continuing the argument may not lead to a resolution and could exacerbate the situation
Click to expand...
I think this thread is enlightening some as to why so many others already have Frank on ignore.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76
Dutch Oven

Dutch Oven

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2019
7,016
2,496
113
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76 and xmontrealer
F

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
92,233
22,501
113
  • Like
Reactions: Kautilya
S

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
51,844
10,186
113
Toronto
Frankfooter said:
Repeating a stupid argument over and over again isn't winning a debate.
Click to expand...
Denying reality is moronic.

Frankfooter said:
The Lancet looked at how Gaza hospitals report deaths, that is totally within their field of study.
Click to expand...
Total BS.

Which scientific study are they analyzing? Who submitted it? What is their hypothesis? What was their methodology?

Why are you withholding this information that would prove your point?
 
Last edited:
F

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
92,233
22,501
113
shack said:
Which scientific study are they analyzing? Who submitted it? What is their hypothesis? What was their methodology?
Click to expand...
I gave you a direct link to the report.
You need to read it or shut up about it, otherwise you're just making even more ignorant and totally uninformed statements.

There is no anaesthetic in Gaza right now.
Your genocide is forcing doctors to operate on children without.
This is what you back.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1734969628680491400
 
  • Angry
Reactions: Klatuu
F

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
92,233
22,501
113
  • Angry
Reactions: Klatuu
L

Leimonis

Well-known member
Feb 28, 2020
9,819
9,587
113
Frankfooter said:
How is that different from you, shack, mandrill and basketcase denying that Israel has committed war crimes?
Click to expand...
Israel so far killed less than 1% of Gazans 75% of whom support hamas.
Seems like IDF is trying to be careful and not harm civilians. So I’m not worried about war crimes.

I don’t know why all the losers of the world decided to root for the underdog in this fight. I am guessing it’s either because misery loves company or because of antisemitism. Neither of those causes I find attractive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76, xmontrealer and Phil C. McNasty
You must log in or register to reply here.
Previous Thread Next Thread
Toronto Escorts
Top Bottom