Reverie

Jewish group demands apology after MPs honoured man who fought for Nazis

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
94,739
24,000
113
It is history and by ignoring the atrocities your are enabling future atrocities. By letting it slide because it was before your time, you are indeed ignoring it.

"Those Who Do Not Learn History Are Doomed To Repeat It." Really? - Big Think
If you are going to accuse someone of being a Nazi war criminal you need to have evidence to back up your claim. If he committed war crimes, by all means, investigate and charge him. But provide evidence.

In 1950, the federal cabinet decided to allow Ukrainians living in the United Kingdom to come to Canada “notwithstanding their service in the German army,” as long as they went through a security screening.
A 1986 commission report on war criminals living in Canada found there were about 600 former members of the Waffen SS Galicia Division living in Canada at the time.
But Justice Jules Deschenes, who led the commission, said membership in the division did not in itself constitute a crime and that “charges of war crimes against members of the Galicia Division have never been substantiated, either in 1950 when they were first preferred or in 1984 when they were renewed or before this commission.”


Frank Sysyn, a history professor at the University of Alberta, said it’s accurate to say that Hunka was not a Nazi, despite fighting for Nazi Germany, because non-Germans weren’t allowed to join the party.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Kautilya

mellowjello

Well-known member
Jan 11, 2017
2,788
1,327
113
It is history and by ignoring the atrocities your are enabling future atrocities. By letting it slide because it was before your time, you are indeed ignoring it.

"Those Who Do Not Learn History Are Doomed To Repeat It." Really? - Big Think
You're very selective about what history should and shouldn't be ignored.
You expect everyone to be consumed by your history, but you ignore the history of another man and his country
by not giving any consideration as to why that man would enlist to fight for his country.
Why don't you look up how badly the Ukraine suffered in that war, or are you not as concerned as you accuse others of being?
While you're at it, you said Hunka "deserves to be held accountable".
Accountable for what?
 

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,964
6,108
113
You're very selective about what history should and shouldn't be ignored.
You expect everyone to be consumed by your history, but you ignore the history of another man and his country
by not giving any consideration as to why that man would enlist to fight for his country.
Why don't you look up how badly the Ukraine suffered in that war, or are you not as concerned as you accuse others of being?
While you're at it, you said Hunka "deserves to be held accountable".
Accountable for what?
There is a difference between signing up to fight for your country and collaborating with the nazis to round up jews to send to extermination camps.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Oracle

Not getting younger

Well-known member
Jun 29, 2022
4,549
2,451
113
There is a difference between signing up to fight for your country and collaborating with the nazis to round up jews to send to extermination camps.
There are multiple or at least a few reasons why he might have joined. Maybe he was simply young, and thought war was an adventure as so many did. And just wanted to be on what he thought would be the winning side.

Not many reasons to hide his past for 75 years. Especially early on. When some evidence might have been around, and he would have certainly known the very vast majority of combatants had nothing to fear.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kautilya

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
31,196
5,307
113
Is that what he did?
We aren't sure. Hence an investigation is needed. There are pictures proving he was in it in 1943. His role, as he was 18, has yet to be determined. If there are historical records ( pictures or deployment orders) showing him at the site of atrocities then a trial is neccessary.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kautilya

mellowjello

Well-known member
Jan 11, 2017
2,788
1,327
113
We aren't sure. Hence an investigation is needed. There are pictures proving he was in it in 1943. His role, as he was 18, has yet to be determined. If there are historical records ( pictures or deployment orders) showing him at the site of atrocities then a trial is neccessary.
I agree.
That would be the sensible and rational approach.
 

mellowjello

Well-known member
Jan 11, 2017
2,788
1,327
113
There are multiple or at least a few reasons why he might have joined. Maybe he was simply young, and thought war was an adventure as so many did. And just wanted to be on what he thought would be the winning side.

Not many reasons to hide his past for 75 years. Especially early on. When some evidence might have been around, and he would have certainly known the very vast majority of combatants had nothing to fear.
You know, for someone accusing me of bold assertions, that's a lot of speculation, probably conjecture on your part.
Nazi hunters have tracked down a lot of Nazis all over the world, long after the crimes were committed, I'm sure they could dig up something
if there was something there.
 

Not getting younger

Well-known member
Jun 29, 2022
4,549
2,451
113
You know, for someone accusing me of bold assertions, that's a lot of speculation, probably conjecture on your part.
Nazi hunters have tracked down a lot of Nazis all over the world, long after the crimes were committed, I'm sure they could dig up something
if there was something there.
Big difference between saying what you did. And just be real. All you, anyone can do is guess. Or were you with him, when he joined?

And with respect to the second half. Yep speculation. But why else would he remain hidden, especially say from the day he arrived for the next 25-50 years…when evidence, witnesses would have been easy to find.And when, he would have known, yes known, nothing to fear. Unless….

There is virtually no other plausible reason.
 
Last edited:

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
31,196
5,307
113
There are multiple or at least a few reasons why he might have joined. Maybe he was simply young, and thought war was an adventure as so many did. And just wanted to be on what he thought would be the winning side.

Not many reasons to hide his past for 75 years. Especially early on. When some evidence might have been around, and he would have certainly known the very vast majority of combatants had nothing to fear.
Um, one thing was the Nazis were meticulous record keepers. They evidence is there. Sometimes its just a matter of wading through it. If Poland can show him involved I don't care about his age. But the proof has to show up before extradition.
 

Klatuu

Well-known member
Dec 31, 2022
6,385
3,802
113
“In 1950, the federal cabinet decided to allow Ukrainians living in the United Kingdom to come to Canada “notwithstanding their service in the German army,” as long as they went through a security screening.


A 1986 commission report on war criminals living in Canada found there were about 600 former members of the Waffen SS Galicia Division living in Canada at the time.


But Justice Jules Deschenes, who led the commission, said membership in the division did not in itself constitute a crime and that “charges of war crimes against members of the Galicia Division have never been substantiated, either in 1950 when they were first preferred or in 1984 when they were renewed or before this commission.”
 

mellowjello

Well-known member
Jan 11, 2017
2,788
1,327
113
Big difference between saying what you did. And just be real. All you, anyone can do is guess. Or were you with him, when he joined?

And with respect to second half. Yep speculation. Why else would he remain hidden, especially say from the day he arrived for the next 25-50 years…when evidence, witnesses would have been easy to find, and when he would have known, known, nothing to fear. Unless….

There is virtually no other plausible reason.
I've never claimed my opinion was fact, but reasonable assertion, unlike you and some others who are ready to put him in front of a firing squad with no evidence.
 

Not getting younger

Well-known member
Jun 29, 2022
4,549
2,451
113
Um, one thing was the Nazis were meticulous record keepers. They evidence is there. Sometimes its just a matter of wading through it. If Poland can show him involved I don't care about his age. But the proof has to show up before extradition.
How many 95 year old witnesses are there? And while there might be some paper trail left. Did they leave maps to mass graves, and who was committing atrocities?

Personally at this point. By the time they could extradite him………
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
31,196
5,307
113
How many 95 year old witnesses are there? And while there might be some paper trail left. Did they leave maps to mass graves, and who was committing atrocities?

Personally at this point. By the time they could extradite him………
Um, eye witnesses carry less weight for me then pictures, old film, and deployment orders.

They have identified him in pictures but now we need context.
 

Not getting younger

Well-known member
Jun 29, 2022
4,549
2,451
113
Some reading material.
Time marches on

Canadas dark history.


The Blunder Seen Around the World.

Like father, like son
Pierre Trudeau once said he intentionally didn't prosecute Nazi war criminals living in Canada lest it inflame European expatcommunity

Realistically, even if a smoking gun was somehow found. He is 98 years old. It’s
A) unlikely he would be extradited,
B) would likely entail a legal fight
C) not something JT will do
D) likely the last of any remaining.

Sometimes have to ask. What’s the upside?
it’s a dark stain in our countries underwear. Better we wear it, imo.
 
Last edited:

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
94,739
24,000
113
Some reading material.
Time marches on

Canadas dark history.


The Blunder Seen Around the World.

Like father, like son



Realistically, even if a smoking gun was somehow found. He is 98 years old. It’s
A) unlikely he would be extradited,
B) would likely entail a legal fight
C) not something JT will do
D) likely the last of any remaining.

Sometimes have to ask. What’s the upside?
it’s a dark stain in our countries underwear. Better we wear it, imo.
What a surprise, right wing media were outraged and tried to blame the PM for someone else's mistake.
Apparently it was the guy's kid who suggested him to the speaker, they didn't know his war history.
 
Toronto Escorts