It is history and by ignoring the atrocities your are enabling future atrocities. By letting it slide because it was before your time, you are indeed ignoring it.I'm not ignoring history. I'm saying it is history.
If you are going to accuse someone of being a Nazi war criminal you need to have evidence to back up your claim. If he committed war crimes, by all means, investigate and charge him. But provide evidence.It is history and by ignoring the atrocities your are enabling future atrocities. By letting it slide because it was before your time, you are indeed ignoring it.
"Those Who Do Not Learn History Are Doomed To Repeat It." Really? - Big Think
You're very selective about what history should and shouldn't be ignored.It is history and by ignoring the atrocities your are enabling future atrocities. By letting it slide because it was before your time, you are indeed ignoring it.
"Those Who Do Not Learn History Are Doomed To Repeat It." Really? - Big Think
There is a difference between signing up to fight for your country and collaborating with the nazis to round up jews to send to extermination camps.You're very selective about what history should and shouldn't be ignored.
You expect everyone to be consumed by your history, but you ignore the history of another man and his country
by not giving any consideration as to why that man would enlist to fight for his country.
Why don't you look up how badly the Ukraine suffered in that war, or are you not as concerned as you accuse others of being?
While you're at it, you said Hunka "deserves to be held accountable".
Accountable for what?
There are multiple or at least a few reasons why he might have joined. Maybe he was simply young, and thought war was an adventure as so many did. And just wanted to be on what he thought would be the winning side.There is a difference between signing up to fight for your country and collaborating with the nazis to round up jews to send to extermination camps.
Is that what he did?There is a difference between signing up to fight for your country and collaborating with the nazis to round up jews to send to extermination camps.
We aren't sure. Hence an investigation is needed. There are pictures proving he was in it in 1943. His role, as he was 18, has yet to be determined. If there are historical records ( pictures or deployment orders) showing him at the site of atrocities then a trial is neccessary.Is that what he did?
I agree.We aren't sure. Hence an investigation is needed. There are pictures proving he was in it in 1943. His role, as he was 18, has yet to be determined. If there are historical records ( pictures or deployment orders) showing him at the site of atrocities then a trial is neccessary.
I'm prepared to agree to extradition but only if there is more substantial prove than enlistment. If he was a clerk in the back thats hella difference then tossing them onto trains knowing the end destination.I agree.
That would be the sensible and rational approach.
You know, for someone accusing me of bold assertions, that's a lot of speculation, probably conjecture on your part.There are multiple or at least a few reasons why he might have joined. Maybe he was simply young, and thought war was an adventure as so many did. And just wanted to be on what he thought would be the winning side.
Not many reasons to hide his past for 75 years. Especially early on. When some evidence might have been around, and he would have certainly known the very vast majority of combatants had nothing to fear.
Big difference between saying what you did. And just be real. All you, anyone can do is guess. Or were you with him, when he joined?You know, for someone accusing me of bold assertions, that's a lot of speculation, probably conjecture on your part.
Nazi hunters have tracked down a lot of Nazis all over the world, long after the crimes were committed, I'm sure they could dig up something
if there was something there.
Um, one thing was the Nazis were meticulous record keepers. They evidence is there. Sometimes its just a matter of wading through it. If Poland can show him involved I don't care about his age. But the proof has to show up before extradition.There are multiple or at least a few reasons why he might have joined. Maybe he was simply young, and thought war was an adventure as so many did. And just wanted to be on what he thought would be the winning side.
Not many reasons to hide his past for 75 years. Especially early on. When some evidence might have been around, and he would have certainly known the very vast majority of combatants had nothing to fear.
I've never claimed my opinion was fact, but reasonable assertion, unlike you and some others who are ready to put him in front of a firing squad with no evidence.Big difference between saying what you did. And just be real. All you, anyone can do is guess. Or were you with him, when he joined?
And with respect to second half. Yep speculation. Why else would he remain hidden, especially say from the day he arrived for the next 25-50 years…when evidence, witnesses would have been easy to find, and when he would have known, known, nothing to fear. Unless….
There is virtually no other plausible reason.
How many 95 year old witnesses are there? And while there might be some paper trail left. Did they leave maps to mass graves, and who was committing atrocities?Um, one thing was the Nazis were meticulous record keepers. They evidence is there. Sometimes its just a matter of wading through it. If Poland can show him involved I don't care about his age. But the proof has to show up before extradition.
Um, eye witnesses carry less weight for me then pictures, old film, and deployment orders.How many 95 year old witnesses are there? And while there might be some paper trail left. Did they leave maps to mass graves, and who was committing atrocities?
Personally at this point. By the time they could extradite him………
Pierre Trudeau once said he intentionally didn't prosecute Nazi war criminals living in Canada lest it inflame European expatcommunity
What a surprise, right wing media were outraged and tried to blame the PM for someone else's mistake.Some reading material.
Time marches on
The last Nazi hunters | Nazism | The Guardian
<strong>The long read</strong>: Since 1958, a small department of Germany’s government has sought to bring members of the Third Reich to trial. A handful of prosecutors are still tracking down Nazis, but the world’s biggest cold-case investigation will soon be shut downamp.theguardian.com
Canadas dark history.
‘Canada has a dark history with Nazis’: political scandal prompts reckoning | Canada | The Guardian
After a Nazi veteran was lauded in parliament, a debate over suspected war criminals who settled in the country is reignitedamp.theguardian.com
![]()
Canada's Nazi debacle renews calls to examine history, including war crime records
Canada could revisit calls to declassify documents about the presence of Nazi war criminals in the country, Immigration Minister Marc Miller said Wednesday, as the fallout continued over Parliament's recognition last week of a man who fought for the Nazis.beta.cp24.com
The Blunder Seen Around the World.
![]()
By Honoring a Nazi, Canada’s Parliament Has Unearthed a Troubling History
When Canada’s parliament unwittingly paid homage to a Nazi veteran, it opened the door to questions about its postwar past. The incident highlights broader issues of historical distortion and the country’s history of harboring Nazi war criminals.jacobin.com
Like father, like son
![]()
FIRST READING: Canada has long been slammed as a 'haven' for ex-Nazis like Yaroslav Hunka
Pierre Trudeau once said he intentionally didn't prosecute Nazi war criminals living in Canada, lest it inflame European expatsnationalpost.com
Realistically, even if a smoking gun was somehow found. He is 98 years old. It’s
A) unlikely he would be extradited,
B) would likely entail a legal fight
C) not something JT will do
D) likely the last of any remaining.
Sometimes have to ask. What’s the upside?
it’s a dark stain in our countries underwear. Better we wear it, imo.