Is Sleepy Joe Biden Trying to Outdo Hitler and History?

Addict2sex

Well-known member
Jan 29, 2017
2,501
1,313
113

Is Sleepy Joe Biden Trying to Outdo Hitler and History?



History is the most interesting subject for many reasons. Not the least of which is the fact it tends to repeat itself. And the fact that some are doomed by ignorance of this is an important lesson for today. Take German tanks, for instance. First, let’s rehash a little history about the steppes of Russia and Eastern Ukraine and unlearned lessons.

From the 5th of July 1943 until the 23rd of August 1943, the largest tank battle in history took place in what became known as the “Kursk Salient,” an area that stretched from the tiny town of Kirov on the Bolva River in the north, through Belgorod in Russia, Kharkiv, which Ukraine currently controls. The line reached deep into the Donbas region, the focal point of Ukraine’s Nazi hostilities since 2014.

Hitler’s Operation Zitadelle (“Citadel”) was carried out over a 700-mile-long front, where the best Germans tried to outgun and outmaneuver the advancing Soviet forces. It became the largest tank battle in history, pitting the most advanced weaponry Nazi Germany had against prepared and dug-in, superior Soviet resistance. The reader will find it interesting that the German high command chose Belgorod as one of the first key objectives.

Numerous parallels exist between the battle of Kursk and the current proxy war in Ukraine. First, I’d like to deal with tanks. In 1943, Germany manufactured what can be argued as the finest medium and heavy armor of World War II. Though not numerous at Kursk, the deadly Tiger played a big role. The all-new Panther and the giant Ferdinand tank destroyer were supposed to blast the Soviets off the battlefield.

Ironically, many of their burning hulks littered the countryside once the battle ended. The battle raged for months, with neither side gaining a clear advantage. The Soviets, not unlike their modern-day counterparts on the Russian lines, created massive defensive works to sap the German offensive until a counterattack would gain a decisive effect.

When I read the other day about almost all of the highly touted German Leopards sent to Zelensky having been destroyed, this seemed like Deja Vu as a student of history. An article in the Berliner Zeitung cited Alexander Sosnowski, who used data from pro-Ukraine media channels to determine that 41 Leopard-2s, 49 T72 tanks, 31 Bradlys, 7 German Marders, 23 howitzers, and 40 MRAP infantry fighting vehicles have already been turned to scrap by the Russians. In 1943, the great Nazi war machine faced similar despair.

But what other parallels can we draw? What is going to happen next? If you ask most experts, Europe is out of ammo, tanks, and guts. The Germans cannot even crank up and run half their remaining Leopard 2s for lack of repair, Paris is on fire, Germans are ready for any Chancellor but Scholz, Hungary seems about ready to leave the NATO alliance, the dollar may crumble toon, and even Americans grow weary of cheering a losing team.

We can understand how idiotic Joe Biden’s war on Russia will end if we recollect what happened after the Kursk failure. The Germans had been progressing in fighting through the defensive layers the Soviets had built. The northern front of the pincer bogged down, and the southern one was halted by bitter Soviet resistance. Hitler, who the legendary Heinz Guderian had warned against Operation Citadel, lost heart when decisive victory was not at hand and focused elsewhere. Meanwhile, the Soviets had gained momentum in the ground war and never relinquished it after Kursk.

As we know, once the Axis began its retreat from Kursk, the Soviets, and their allies from the West marched into the heart of Europe, taking Berlin and destroying the dream of Leibensraum, at least for the moment. Today, we find Germany’s best tanks strewn all over the battle lines in the regions reclaimed by Russia. Of course, they are not the Tigers or Panthers of legend. Four Tiger tanks held off tank brigades at Kursk. Now a lightweight drone seemed capable of knocking one out. The same seems true for NATO, a military alliance that has never shown it could beat its way out of a wet paper bag, let alone conquer Russia.

Whoever devised this genius plan to create Operation Barbarossa 2 is not even as clever as a drugged Hitler on his worst day. All that has happened is that the Russians are preparing again. Factories are shifting to creating T-14 Armata tanks instead of luxury Lada 4x4s. Far from the front, the Russians ramp up their military complex as before. For Westerners, we can only hope they do so for defensive rather than offensive operations. For certain, as the fires of discontent burning in Paris, there is nothing behind the Donetsk River to stop the Russians if they choose to widen their breathing space.

Funny, isn’t it, how history repeats itself and does so in the same places with the same idiotic mistakes being made?
 

DinkleMouse

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2022
1,435
1,760
113

Is Sleepy Joe Biden Trying to Outdo Hitler and History?



History is the most interesting subject for many reasons. Not the least of which is the fact it tends to repeat itself. And the fact that some are doomed by ignorance of this is an important lesson for today. Take German tanks, for instance. First, let’s rehash a little history about the steppes of Russia and Eastern Ukraine and unlearned lessons.

From the 5th of July 1943 until the 23rd of August 1943, the largest tank battle in history took place in what became known as the “Kursk Salient,” an area that stretched from the tiny town of Kirov on the Bolva River in the north, through Belgorod in Russia, Kharkiv, which Ukraine currently controls. The line reached deep into the Donbas region, the focal point of Ukraine’s Nazi hostilities since 2014.

Hitler’s Operation Zitadelle (“Citadel”) was carried out over a 700-mile-long front, where the best Germans tried to outgun and outmaneuver the advancing Soviet forces. It became the largest tank battle in history, pitting the most advanced weaponry Nazi Germany had against prepared and dug-in, superior Soviet resistance. The reader will find it interesting that the German high command chose Belgorod as one of the first key objectives.

Numerous parallels exist between the battle of Kursk and the current proxy war in Ukraine. First, I’d like to deal with tanks. In 1943, Germany manufactured what can be argued as the finest medium and heavy armor of World War II. Though not numerous at Kursk, the deadly Tiger played a big role. The all-new Panther and the giant Ferdinand tank destroyer were supposed to blast the Soviets off the battlefield.

Ironically, many of their burning hulks littered the countryside once the battle ended. The battle raged for months, with neither side gaining a clear advantage. The Soviets, not unlike their modern-day counterparts on the Russian lines, created massive defensive works to sap the German offensive until a counterattack would gain a decisive effect.

When I read the other day about almost all of the highly touted German Leopards sent to Zelensky having been destroyed, this seemed like Deja Vu as a student of history. An article in the Berliner Zeitung cited Alexander Sosnowski, who used data from pro-Ukraine media channels to determine that 41 Leopard-2s, 49 T72 tanks, 31 Bradlys, 7 German Marders, 23 howitzers, and 40 MRAP infantry fighting vehicles have already been turned to scrap by the Russians. In 1943, the great Nazi war machine faced similar despair.

But what other parallels can we draw? What is going to happen next? If you ask most experts, Europe is out of ammo, tanks, and guts. The Germans cannot even crank up and run half their remaining Leopard 2s for lack of repair, Paris is on fire, Germans are ready for any Chancellor but Scholz, Hungary seems about ready to leave the NATO alliance, the dollar may crumble toon, and even Americans grow weary of cheering a losing team.

We can understand how idiotic Joe Biden’s war on Russia will end if we recollect what happened after the Kursk failure. The Germans had been progressing in fighting through the defensive layers the Soviets had built. The northern front of the pincer bogged down, and the southern one was halted by bitter Soviet resistance. Hitler, who the legendary Heinz Guderian had warned against Operation Citadel, lost heart when decisive victory was not at hand and focused elsewhere. Meanwhile, the Soviets had gained momentum in the ground war and never relinquished it after Kursk.

As we know, once the Axis began its retreat from Kursk, the Soviets, and their allies from the West marched into the heart of Europe, taking Berlin and destroying the dream of Leibensraum, at least for the moment. Today, we find Germany’s best tanks strewn all over the battle lines in the regions reclaimed by Russia. Of course, they are not the Tigers or Panthers of legend. Four Tiger tanks held off tank brigades at Kursk. Now a lightweight drone seemed capable of knocking one out. The same seems true for NATO, a military alliance that has never shown it could beat its way out of a wet paper bag, let alone conquer Russia.

Whoever devised this genius plan to create Operation Barbarossa 2 is not even as clever as a drugged Hitler on his worst day. All that has happened is that the Russians are preparing again. Factories are shifting to creating T-14 Armata tanks instead of luxury Lada 4x4s. Far from the front, the Russians ramp up their military complex as before. For Westerners, we can only hope they do so for defensive rather than offensive operations. For certain, as the fires of discontent burning in Paris, there is nothing behind the Donetsk River to stop the Russians if they choose to widen their breathing space.

Funny, isn’t it, how history repeats itself and does so in the same places with the same idiotic mistakes being made?
Tanks get destroyed. That's what they're there for. I'm surprised that an article about WWII "flashbacks" to Kursk focuses so heavily on Western table being destroyed given the massive numbers of WWII table Russia pulled out of storage that are littering the battlefield.

And if he really thinks *all* the Western tanks have been destroyed, he's lost his mind.
 

wigglee

Well-known member
Oct 13, 2010
10,323
2,219
113
Putin is the aggressor so he is the one trying to outdo Hitler. Biden is not having it . He's more like Churchill here.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
51,719
10,122
113
Toronto
What a fucking stupid premise.

Whoever wrote that and those who believe it have a totally warped sense of reality and history created by their political leanings, ideology and agenda.
 

SchlongConery

License to Shill
Jan 28, 2013
12,977
6,455
113


Funny, isn’t it, how history repeats itself and does so in the same places with the same idiotic mistakes being made?
What a fucking stupid premise.

Whoever wrote that and those who believe it have a totally warped sense of reality and history created by their political leanings, ideology and agenda.

 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,866
22,266
113
Tanks get destroyed. That's what they're there for. I'm surprised that an article about WWII "flashbacks" to Kursk focuses so heavily on Western table being destroyed given the massive numbers of WWII table Russia pulled out of storage that are littering the battlefield.

And if he really thinks *all* the Western tanks have been destroyed, he's lost his mind.
The bigger point should be whether those in the tanks survive the tank being destroyed or not.
Russian tanks? Not at all.
 

y2kmark

Class of 69...
May 19, 2002
19,064
5,442
113
Lewiston, NY
What a fucking stupid premise.

Whoever wrote that and those who believe it have a totally warped sense of reality and history created by their political leanings, ideology and agenda.
Well certainly never pointed out that Hitler's biggest mistake was to attack Russia in the first place. The Nazi's primary objective was Ukraine (yeah, that Ukraine, then part of the USSR) looking for living space and food security despite a British blockade. Part of that plan was to deliberately let the Ukrainians starve to free up all that prime territory for Nordic farming folk (colonists). If you think about it, it's one reason Ukrainians are less than keen on being called Nazis...
 

kherg007

Well-known member
May 3, 2014
9,083
7,140
113
Wow. The profound ignorance of the person who wrote that article cited above is breathtaking.
 

DinkleMouse

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2022
1,435
1,760
113
The Nazi's primary objective was Ukraine (yeah, that Ukraine, then part of the USSR) looking for living space and food security despite a British blockade. Part of that plan was to deliberately let the Ukrainians starve to free up all that prime territory for Nordic farming folk (colonists). If you think about it, it's one reason Ukrainians are less than keen on being called Nazis...
I do not believe that is correct. Certainly not in my studies. No more so than Lebensraum was the stated objective of most Nazi aggression at least.

Hitler hated the Soviets and felt they were a subhuman race that needed to be exterminated. The fact that Stalin ever felt Hitler could be an ally is mind-blowing. Clearly he hadn't read Mein Kampf.
 

y2kmark

Class of 69...
May 19, 2002
19,064
5,442
113
Lewiston, NY
Wow. The profound ignorance of the person who wrote that article cited above is breathtaking.
Starting with a foregone conclusion and reasoning your way back can have it's limitations...
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts