At this point he reminds me of Stolen Valour. Completely exposed, refusing to admit anything.You really don't understand how badly you lost this argument, do you?
At this point he reminds me of Stolen Valour. Completely exposed, refusing to admit anything.You really don't understand how badly you lost this argument, do you?
You're asking a lot of Butler's reading comprehension here.Are you actually serious? Did you even read the big box at the top of the page that says "As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsement of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health. Learn more about our disclaimer." It's not a journal. It's a database that links to articles and journals and straight up says so.
That would be consistent with Butler's MO.I know exactly what happened. You googled what you wanted to prove (immediate confirmation bias), find a link that backed you up, any immediately posted it and now you're stuck looking foolish and trying to defend your rash behavior in not actually looking into what you found.
I don't think that's quite right.Besides, it was an open letter. Meaning the journal rejected it and the author took it upon themselves to publish it. No one, except the author, felt it was valid enough to publish or it would have been included in Pediatrics.
Oh dear.Basically doctors are doing the same thing they did with Ivermactin.
Let m know when the drug gets FDA approval for trans minors.You're asking a lot of Butler's reading comprehension here.
That would be consistent with Butler's MO.
I don't think that's quite right.
He did write to Pediatrics and had it rejected, but then got it published by Archives of Sexual Behavior.
Of course, that brings up the issue of the journal that did publish it.
After all, it's the kind of thing that must have popped up on a search Butler did, and given the kind of sources he likes to reinforce his beliefs, the algorithm was likely to serve him something along those lines. That would make one want to dig into any source Butler might cite as a scientific truth... just to be sure. It might be the kind of journal that has developed a reputation on a specific issue of late...
You mean prescribing a drug for treatment not approved for usage that way by the FDA?Oh dear.
Please say more about this analogy.
So are puberty blockers approved by the FDA for transgender kids?At this point he reminds me of Stolen Valour. Completely exposed, refusing to admit anything.Some people can't be helped.
Parading naked in front of kids is not a human right though, which is what we're discussing hereLoL. What behavior have I been defending. Tolerance? Respect for diversity? The right to live one's life as they choose for themselves? The right not to be judged based upon the actions of a few?
Guilty to all
Actually, it is happeningWhich isn't happening. But sure, freak out about it just like you're freaking out over women's sports
They can insult me all they want. It doesnt faze me and I come back twice as hardMr. Phil, I have to give you credit for starting this thread. You must have known you would be the target of vicious attacks by the wokies. Remember they have trade marked all the "phobias" and I think they used at least 3 against you
Actually some children do get the surgery. See my post aboveNo, I never said children GET the surgery. I said that giving them puberty blockers PUTS THEM ON THE INEVITABLE road to surgery.
So the question is actually simple. Is a 10/11 year old boy or girl mentally and emotionally capable of making the decision to get surgery a decade later? When they are an adult but never went through puberty. And to be sterilized as an end result?
I say no.
This ^They were enough to get banned by major sporting bodies. And you are strawman arguing again.
I fully support funding transgender surgery, and all of the steps leading up to it, including the drugs, councilling, support, all of it. I just don't support it until they are adults. Its a harder road. But a necessary one to ensure mistakes aren't made
Yeah, and why do you think anti LGBTQ sentiment is growing??
I said in stores and other businesses. I didn't see many Canadian flags in stores or windows of stores or businesses but I did see a lot of pride flags. Are you telling me you saw more Canadian flags than pride flags? If you did you're either inventing something or it's conformation bias.I don't know where you were, but I saw Canadian flags everywhere. I'm going to guess either your story is invented or it's confirmation bias.
To be clear I'm talking about the bottom surgery. Although ask any breast cancer patient of the trauma of a mastectomy and its still pretty bad.Actually some children do get the surgery. See my post above
Of course! Its all about moneyLooks like trying to cash in to me
LOL. You are obsessed.Parading naked in front of kids is not a human right though, which is what we're discussing here
Thats what I thought, you got nothing left but ad hominem attacksLOL. You are obsessed
LOL. Have you ever seen me or for that matter anyone else defend public nudity? if course not. But you keep going back to a few idiots to tarnish a group of millions of people. And that is what you expect me or anyone else to respond to seriously.Thats what I thought, you got nothing left but ad hominem attacks
You've been defending it this entire thread.LOL. Have you ever seen me or for that matter anyone else defend public nudity? if course not
I never said every gay person during Pride parades naked, but there are some that do, and the majority is not speaking out against it loud enoughBut you keep going back to a few idiots to tarnish a group of millions of people. And that is what you expect me or anyone else to respond to seriously





