The LGBTQ protest thread

[DinkleMouse]

Game set match.

You literally don't know the difference between a study and an open letter, and literally dismiss disclaimers in big boxes on pages you link to. You cannot be trusted to understand anything you find.

If anyone depends on you for anything, may God have mercy on their soul.

Game set match? You're barely drooling on your bib sitting on the sidelines of a ping pong tournament, your definitely not winning any tennis matches.

 

[Butler1000]

You're serious? The US government put a disclaimer saying "we didn't publish this, we're merely linking to it, the fact that we've linked to it doesn't mean we think it's true or correct", and you're seriously going to say that the fact that they've linked to it does indeed mean it's true???

You're not trolling? You legitimately believe that? Why do you think the US Government put that disclaimer if it wasn't true? I'm speechless here. Tell me you're just been an asshat troll and don't legit believe that that, because if you legit believe that then I don't even know how you matriculated from elementary school.

My above links continue to hurt your claims of legitimacy in studies. Two of the largest approval bodies haven't approved them.

 

[DinkleMouse]

My above links continue to hurt your claims of legitimacy in studies. Two of the largest approval bodies haven't approved them.

Your continued defiance of a disclaimer on a website thaslt you reject out of hand and your insistence that an "open letter" is a "published study" continue to hurt you claims of anything you post actually saying what you think it does.

Nothing you have posted up to now has actually said what you said it did or been where you claimed it was. I'm not wasting any more time looking into them to explain to you to try and educate you when you're so dug in you can't even admit that a disclaimer exists for as reason.

As I said, God help anyone that depends on you to make decisions for them. Talk to the ether, because I'm not wasting anymore time talking to someone who literally can't admit they didn't read a disclaimer or didn't read an entire sentence.

So you have any idea how wrong and foolish and idiotic you look? And you claim "game set match"? This isn't a game. It's people's lives, and you can't even admit a disclaimer exists.

Get help, dude. Seriously.

 

[Butler1000]

Your continued defiance of a disclaimer on a website thaslt you reject out of hand and your insistence that an "open letter" is a "published study" continue to hurt you claims of anything you post actually saying what you think it does.

Nothing you have posted up to now has actually said what you said it did or been where you claimed it was. I'm not wasting any more time looking into them to explain to you to try and educate you when you're so dug in you can't even admit that a disclaimer exists for as reason.

As I said, God help anyone that depends on you to make decisions for them. Talk to the ether, because I'm not wasting anymore time talking to someone who literally can't admit they didn't read a disclaimer or didn't read an entire sentence.

So you have any idea how wrong and foolish and idiotic you look? And you claim "game set match"? This isn't a game. It's people's lives, and you can't even admit a disclaimer exists.

Get help, dude. Seriously.

Lol. Run rabbit run. The FDA haven't approved it for use with Transgender kids. The British NHS banned their use until a proper study is complete. Verify it with your own links.

No studies to approve the drug have been done and presented for approvals.

I hope they get them soon. That they come out as safe. But until they do giving them to kids is negligent.

 

[Frankfooter]

Lol. Run rabbit run. The FDA haven't approved it for use with Transgender kids. The British NHS banned their use until a proper study is complete. Verify it with your own links.

No studies to approve the drug have been done and presented for approvals.

I hope they get them soon. That they come out as safe. But until they do giving them to kids is negligent.

You really don't understand how badly you lost this argument, do you?

 

[DinkleMouse]

You really don't understand how badly you lost this argument, do you?

At this point he reminds me of Stolen Valour. Completely exposed, refusing to admit anything. Some people can't be helped.

 

[Valcazar]

Are you actually serious? Did you even read the big box at the top of the page that says "As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsement of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health. Learn more about our disclaimer." It's not a journal. It's a database that links to articles and journals and straight up says so.

You're asking a lot of Butler's reading comprehension here.

I know exactly what happened. You googled what you wanted to prove (immediate confirmation bias), find a link that backed you up, any immediately posted it and now you're stuck looking foolish and trying to defend your rash behavior in not actually looking into what you found.

That would be consistent with Butler's MO.

Besides, it was an open letter. Meaning the journal rejected it and the author took it upon themselves to publish it. No one, except the author, felt it was valid enough to publish or it would have been included in Pediatrics.

I don't think that's quite right.
He did write to Pediatrics and had it rejected, but then got it published by Archives of Sexual Behavior.

Of course, that brings up the issue of the journal that did publish it.

After all, it's the kind of thing that must have popped up on a search Butler did, and given the kind of sources he likes to reinforce his beliefs, the algorithm was likely to serve him something along those lines. That would make one want to dig into any source Butler might cite as a scientific truth... just to be sure. It might be the kind of journal that has developed a reputation on a specific issue of late...

asbopenletter.com

 

[Valcazar]

Basically doctors are doing the same thing they did with Ivermactin.

Oh dear.
Please say more about this analogy.

 

[Butler1000]

You're asking a lot of Butler's reading comprehension here.



That would be consistent with Butler's MO.



I don't think that's quite right.
He did write to Pediatrics and had it rejected, but then got it published by Archives of Sexual Behavior.

Of course, that brings up the issue of the journal that did publish it.

After all, it's the kind of thing that must have popped up on a search Butler did, and given the kind of sources he likes to reinforce his beliefs, the algorithm was likely to serve him something along those lines. That would make one want to dig into any source Butler might cite as a scientific truth... just to be sure. It might be the kind of journal that has developed a reputation on a specific issue of late...

asbopenletter.com

Let m know when the drug gets FDA approval for trans minors.

 

[Butler1000]

Oh dear.
Please say more about this analogy.

You mean prescribing a drug for treatment not approved for usage that way by the FDA?

 

[Butler1000]

At this point he reminds me of Stolen Valour. Completely exposed, refusing to admit anything. Some people can't be helped.

So are puberty blockers approved by the FDA for transgender kids?

 

[Insidious Von]

"I fuck your ass and make you humble", catchphrase of the dearly departed Iron Sheik.

Jim Dandy DeSantis is touting his draconian record against the LGBTQ community. He hasn't gone far enough, will he legalize pogroms against them?

 

[Phil C. McNasty]

LoL. What behavior have I been defending. Tolerance? Respect for diversity? The right to live one's life as they choose for themselves? The right not to be judged based upon the actions of a few?

Guilty to all

Parading naked in front of kids is not a human right though, which is what we're discussing here

 

[Phil C. McNasty]

Which isn't happening. But sure, freak out about it just like you're freaking out over women's sports

Actually, it is happening

California teen sues doctors over breast-removal surgery at age 13

Layla Jane, 18, says she should never have been put through the 'torment' of testosterone hormones at age 12 and puberty blockers and surgery the next year, and seeks payback from her doctors.

www.dailymail.co.uk

I had trans op to become a woman at 19 - but went back to being a man

EXCLUSIVE: Daniel Black, who is now 23, decided to become a woman after bullying at school made him doubt his masculinity and sexual orientation.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Now, are you gonna admit you're wrong, or are you gonna obfuscate and change the subject like you usually do??

 

[Phil C. McNasty]

Mr. Phil, I have to give you credit for starting this thread. You must have known you would be the target of vicious attacks by the wokies. Remember they have trade marked all the "phobias" and I think they used at least 3 against you

They can insult me all they want. It doesnt faze me and I come back twice as hard

 

[Phil C. McNasty]

No, I never said children GET the surgery. I said that giving them puberty blockers PUTS THEM ON THE INEVITABLE road to surgery.

So the question is actually simple. Is a 10/11 year old boy or girl mentally and emotionally capable of making the decision to get surgery a decade later? When they are an adult but never went through puberty. And to be sterilized as an end result?

I say no.

Actually some children do get the surgery. See my post above

 

[Phil C. McNasty]

They were enough to get banned by major sporting bodies. And you are strawman arguing again.

I fully support funding transgender surgery, and all of the steps leading up to it, including the drugs, councilling, support, all of it. I just don't support it until they are adults. Its a harder road. But a necessary one to ensure mistakes aren't made

This ^

 

[Phil C. McNasty]

Growing concern over anti-LGBTQ violence as Pride winds down | Watch (msn.com)

Yeah, and why do you think anti LGBTQ sentiment is growing??
Its because they are now starting to overstep their boundaries.
Expect anti LGBTQ sentiment to keep growing, unless they start pulling back a bit

 

[Gooseifur]

I don't know where you were, but I saw Canadian flags everywhere. I'm going to guess either your story is invented or it's confirmation bias.

I said in stores and other businesses. I didn't see many Canadian flags in stores or windows of stores or businesses but I did see a lot of pride flags. Are you telling me you saw more Canadian flags than pride flags? If you did you're either inventing something or it's conformation bias.

 

[Butler1000]

Actually some children do get the surgery. See my post above

To be clear I'm talking about the bottom surgery. Although ask any breast cancer patient of the trauma of a mastectomy and its still pretty bad.

Love how the doctors discuss informed choice. Looks like trying to cash in to me.