Trump indicted like an orange pussy meanie

[danmand]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669064178605371392

Lock him up ROTFLMAO

 

[mandrill]

That is what I think is self evident: The President cannot be convicted of espionage. And the idea that he cannot take some of his documents with him to the washroom is laughable.

What do you base that legal opinion on, Danny?.... Something George Galloway wrote in RT? Or maybe it was Hersh?

 

[kherg007]

Wow. Fox world is totally fucking w the minds of their viewers. Defence plans always belong to the USA. Never to the president. No matter what the classification. Presidential records act means the opposite of what Trump says it does.
He can't take them, keep them, lie about them, show them, etc.

 

[jcpro]

That is what I think is self evident: The President cannot be convicted of espionage. And the idea that he cannot take some of his documents with him to the washroom is laughable.

When I saw Wilson's 1917 Espionage Act, I almost choked with laughter. That's desperation.

 

[mitchell76]

 

[jcpro]

Wanna see something funny?

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669021253594750983

 

[Frankfooter]

IMHO, if it wasn't Donald Trump, none of these charges, would have been filed!!

Clearly, no other president is anywhere close to as moronic as rump.
No other POTUS would try to pull this crap.

 

[Pleasure Hound]

When I saw Wilson's 1917 Espionage Act, I almost choked with laughter. That's desperation.

So, you must die laughing at the Constitution too.....

 

[Valcazar]

You see, that's how spin looks like: Biden, Pence did exactly the same thing. No, they didn't. They broke the law being in possession of of classified documents. Obama and Trump did not, as there's no such thing as classified document for the President.

Trump isn't President.

 

[Valcazar]

Again. There's no such thing as a classified document to a President. And thanks for mentioning Bubba. As he had his own problem with the "presidential materials " and the judge, Amy Berman Jackson, ruled:
“Since the President is completely entrusted with the management and even the disposal of Presidential records during his time in office,” she held, “it would be difficult for this Court to conclude that Congress intended that he would have less authority to do what he pleases with what he considers to be his personal records.”

Judge Jackson added that “the PRA contains no provision obligating or even permitting the Archivist to assume control over records that the President ‘categorized’ and ‘filed separately’ as personal records. At the conclusion of the President’s term, the Archivist only ‘assumes responsibility for the Presidential records.’ . . . PRA does not confer any mandatory or even discretionary authority on the Archivist to classify records. Under the statute, this responsibility is left solely to the President.” Needless to say, if the present judge in the Trump case follows the Clinton ruling, and there's no reason to think that she won't, this case is going exactly nowhere. Just an attempt by Biden to hurt his 2024 opponent.

Leaving aside whether or not you are misrepresenting the case, what does this have to do with what Trump was indicted for?

 

[Valcazar]

What was Clinton's case again?

Judicial Watch wanted to force NARA to declare the tapes Clinton made to be Presidential records and the court said it couldn't force NARA to do that.

 

[Valcazar]

That is what I think is self evident: The President cannot be convicted of espionage. And the idea that he cannot take some of his documents with him to the washroom is laughable.

The President isn't being charged with espionage. Trump isn't being charged with taking some of his documents to the washroom.

 

[mandrill]

When I saw Wilson's 1917 Espionage Act, I almost choked with laughter. That's desperation.

Why?

The murder provisions in the Canadian Criminal Code were written in 1870. Does that mean that murderers in Canada shouldn't go to jail?

 

[jcpro]

Why?

The murder provisions in the Canadian Criminal Code were written in 1870. Does that mean that murderers in Canada shouldn't go to jail?

Yes, Orange Man bad. ROTFLMFAO!! Got to start communicating in the language you poor TDS sufferers understand.

 

[mandrill]

Yes, Orange Man bad. ROTFLMFAO!! Got to start communicating in the language you poor TDS sufferers understand.

Make an actual real response to my post and discuss the criminal legislation involved in Trump's charges and what it says..... I'll wait.

 

[jcpro]

Make an actual real response to my post and discuss the criminal legislation involved in Trump's charges and what it says..... I'll wait.

Orange Man very bad. Worse than typhus, the fifth rider of the Apocalypse and Death's right hand man. LOL!

 

[jalimon]

Judicial Watch wanted to force NARA to declare the tapes Clinton made to be Presidential records and the court said it couldn't force NARA to do that.

But was it for the consensual blowjob case?

 

[skypilot68]

WOW, what a spin, TS SCI document on nuclear deployment and military response plan can be sold by a President because he is the President and not consider espionage. Dont make this about Trump.

 

[jalimon]

Orange Man very bad. Worse than typhus, the fifth rider of the Apocalypse and Death's right hand man. LOL!

He is a treat for US democracy and civil war.

We can he went far in life unfortunately history will regret this narcissist over ego bully prick.

 

[Frankfooter]

Yes, Orange Man bad. ROTFLMFAO!! Got to start communicating in the language you poor TDS sufferers understand.

You need to start praying to rump's pastor for rump to be reelected so he can pardon himself in jail.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1667174414746615808