Andrew Tate is arrested and his luxury villa in Romania is raided by police
- Thread starter Knuckle Ball
- Start date
- Status
Shhhhh, don't say movie!!! You're going to crush Ori's world.
I believe the Tate bros. are in a matrix of their own making and it exist mostly in their own minds. To perpetuate this manufactured hoax of the mind they had to move to Romania because to stay in any western country they would be put under scrutiny by some LE organization be it the local LE or Federal / State organizations like the tax department . In telling their own story they tell that when they were 25 years old they were broke, in ten years they are have amassed hundreds of millions of dollars.
Very possibly they were set up by some person/organization to perform a task to achieve a goal or control persons/organizations. The way Jeffrey Epstein and Les Wexner was set up to do a task. Jeffrey Epstein was set up as a honey pot to lure in and ensnare rich and powerful people, but he got too arrogant and cockey, he sampled his own product and got caught himself. Les Wexner was set up as a money man to finance operations like he did for Epstein. The powers that be set him up by knocking off all the competition. Or, the competition was bought off if they were too big. ( like Canadian scanty panty retailer La Senza )
The benefit the Tate Bros. can provide to a powerful organization is to be a puppet for a de facto power/person(s) and limit/control people or organizations. While Epstein may be part of a inter government intelligence organization the Tate Bros, may just be thugs working for the local mafia. Epstein and the Tate Bros. may be independent contractors providing a service or solution for a shadow criminal person(s)/organization. Epstein and the Tate Bros. may have over stepped their purview of operation and become too noticeable to be useful to their master(s) That is not to say that all these conspiracies are inter linked worldwide. The only Matrix that exist is in the sphere of influence that Epstein and the Tate Bros. had on their victims or people they came in contact with.
Very possibly they were set up by some person/organization to perform a task to achieve a goal or control persons/organizations. The way Jeffrey Epstein and Les Wexner was set up to do a task. Jeffrey Epstein was set up as a honey pot to lure in and ensnare rich and powerful people, but he got too arrogant and cockey, he sampled his own product and got caught himself. Les Wexner was set up as a money man to finance operations like he did for Epstein. The powers that be set him up by knocking off all the competition. Or, the competition was bought off if they were too big. ( like Canadian scanty panty retailer La Senza )
The benefit the Tate Bros. can provide to a powerful organization is to be a puppet for a de facto power/person(s) and limit/control people or organizations. While Epstein may be part of a inter government intelligence organization the Tate Bros, may just be thugs working for the local mafia. Epstein and the Tate Bros. may be independent contractors providing a service or solution for a shadow criminal person(s)/organization. Epstein and the Tate Bros. may have over stepped their purview of operation and become too noticeable to be useful to their master(s) That is not to say that all these conspiracies are inter linked worldwide. The only Matrix that exist is in the sphere of influence that Epstein and the Tate Bros. had on their victims or people they came in contact with.
Last edited:
VICE went woke and now...
/cloudfront-us-east-2.images.arcpublishing.com/reuters/MXCGAJRF5NMS3A7YWK4FIBVTMI.jpg)
Vice Media preparing to file for bankruptcy, New York Times reports
Vice Media Group, the company behind popular media websites such as Vice and Motherboard, is preparing to file for bankruptcy, the New York Times reported on Monday, citing people with knowledge of its operations.
www.reuters.com
Fuck the Tate bros, let them rot in jail.
I'm more concerned that Ja Morant went Urkel Gangsta again. Imagine giving this guy a gun.
I'm more concerned that Ja Morant went Urkel Gangsta again. Imagine giving this guy a gun.
Still no charges yet.
I have a feeling they got nothing on him.
Those 2 camgirls who said the Tates always treated them well wont help their case
I have a feeling they got nothing on him.
Those 2 camgirls who said the Tates always treated them well wont help their case
Imagine being ordered to be confined for 6 months and still nothing, no charges. Supposedly a year after the investigation began.
All because of the easily disproven accusations of one American chick.
www.geo.tv
The media really likes to beat the "misogynistic" drum. Soon that word will become as compromised a "racist" and "transphobic", if it hasn't already.
www.independent.co.uk
All because of the easily disproven accusations of one American chick.
Piers Morgan speaks out after Andrew Tate’s house arrest extended another 30 days
Piers Morgan has recently spoken out after Andrew Tate was “ordered” by the Romanian government to remain under house arrest for at least 30 more days.On May 19, the controversial influencer took to Twitter and...
www.geo.tv
The media really likes to beat the "misogynistic" drum. Soon that word will become as compromised a "racist" and "transphobic", if it hasn't already.
One in four young men agree with Andrew Tate’s views on women, poll finds
Exclusive: Campaigners say the influencer is a ‘legitimising force’ for misogynistic ideas
www.independent.co.uk
As Mr. Tater has said in the past, he bribes government people in Romania. It is far cheaper for him to bribe government people and/or witnesses than to face the consequences. While $100 K only changes your life so much. For the average Romanian it is equivalent to 15-20 times the average annual salary.
My opinions on this interview.
The touchy areas he couldn't go into because of the ongoing investigation. I'm sure his legal advisors were against this at all.
If they're going to challenge him on what he said or tweeted then they should provide proof in context. A visual demonstration would be best. She couldn't do that.
I didn't know he did all that charity work. She had no interest in inquiring about his time behind bars or the fact that he is under house arrest without being charged.
At one point she called him the most dangerous man in the world. Then backtracked on that. she brought up a complainant named ''Sophie'' a few times. He said that she was fictitious and didn't exist.
She continually brought up that he was having a negative impact on certain groups in the UK but couldn't prove it. Empty accusations at best.
He claimed he doesn't own the online school Hustlers University...She didn't dispute that. I thought he owned it. Hmm.
He kept attacking her and the legacy media for not doing their homework. It was clear she hadn't.
At the end he was gracious said he had a good time, thanked her and tried to shake her hand but she refused. That's a bad look for her. She made this interview personal and it showed. Everyone is sick of this style of journalism. They haven't learned since the debacle of the Cathy Newman interview with Jordan Peterson in 2018.
BBC taking another hit here I'm afraid. You'd think they would know better. Next both Lucy and the BBC are going to play the victim card and claim online threats against them as a result of this interview. You watch.
I'd like to see Piers Morgan take a crack at sitting down with him. Their interactions are always interesting and at the same time provoking.
His father passed away in October 17, 2015.
So unless you have some psychic abilities.......
The interviewer's argument/bias/POV: "Misogyny!"
Legacy media, their boomer audience, and young radical lefties are like children.
Legacy media, their boomer audience, and young radical lefties are like children.
His lawyer was in the room shouting instructions and disrupting the interviewer's flow
She rattled him and put him in defensive mode and the panic was evident in his tone and facial contortions.
Why should she, what is there to tell? Why should she allow him to play the victim?
He is an asshole and has said things only an asshole would state publicly.
What did Andrew Tate say? Entire controversy and backlash explained
Since his arrival on the scene, Andrew Tate has been among the most controversial figures in the internet community.
She did a great job and the fact it showed on her face she was disgusted by his presence annoyed the shit out of him.
How can you argue that he does not have a negative impact on certain groups? https://www.theguardian.com/technol...violent-misogynistic-world-of-tiktok-new-star.
He lied about Hustler's University
Hustlers University 4.0
Hustlers University 4.0 is an exclusive community of over 160,000 active members achieving financial freedom with modern wealth creation founded by Andrew Tate.
tateshustlers.com
He lied to you, what else have you fallen for?
Of course, when you don't like what the media is saying, attack them. Isn't that what your other hero did? Throw nonsense and bullshit because the sheep will believe it.
He was an arrogant prick and she wasn't having anything to do with it. In my opinion, she did a great job rattling the "G".
The only thing I will agree with you is I wouldn't mind seeing Pierce at him although I'd like to see a more combative Pierce instead of ass-kisser Morgan because he's a bit afraid of the right-wing.
Tate truly at his best here....Demanding a 50k donation to his charity and of course a box of chocolates, to give anymore interviews to the legacy media. This is just brilliant.
- Status
