So still no comment on repeated Iranian violations or their refusal to re-enter the JCPOA because...Jews.
Iran still enriching to 60%
- Thread starter basketcase
- Start date
Ah, the pathetic excuse that it's racist to call out your racism. Remember, the first step to recovery is to admit there is a problem.
Iran's nuclear program deserves criticism for the exact reasons the IAEA has been after them. They have a massive and continually expanding enrichment capacity for a single civilian reactor. They are enriching to 5%, 20%, 60% and 'accidentally' 84% despite that 1 reactor needing 3.67% U-235. They have been caught by the IAEA with undeclared nuclear sites which they refuse to even pretend to explain or answer where those materials are now. Their actions now have Saudi Arabia pushing strongly for their own nuclear program.
And you keep going on about supporting the JCPOA yet refuse to actually hold Iran accountable for refusing the EU mediated deal last year.
Instead of even hinting at criticism for Iran, all you do is bitch about Israel (while staying silent on the other non-NPT powers). It is 100% evident that your knee jerk defence of Iran is motivated simply by the fact that Iran is as hostile to Israel existing as you are.
The IAEA and UN are also after Israel.
Until you back those calls on both countries you are acting like a partisan warmonger.
Both should sign those treaties.
And Jews again.
Instead of even hinting at criticism for Iran, all you do is bitch about Israel (while staying silent on the other non-NPT powers). It is 100% evident that your knee jerk defence of Iran is motivated simply by the fact that Iran is as hostile to Israel existing as you are.
You took a post where I said both Iran and Israel should abide by the NPT and claimed I was criticizing only Israel?
That's really fucked up.
Yes, I quoted a post where you refuse to actually criticize Iran's actions and instead tried to make it part of your Jew crusade.
If Iran doesn't want to be part of the NPT then they should drop out like North Korea did. Until they do, they should be held accountable for their violations.
Still pushing for a war with Iran and claiming its antisemitic to think Iran and Israel should be treated the same?
Sigh.
Wow that's a retarded attempt to avoid criticizing Iran.
And yes, your obsessive focus on Israel is part of your anti-semitism.
This thread is too boring.
There's only so much racist warmongering I can take.
So why do you continue?
The whole thread is you looking at the indisputable negatives involved in Iran's nuclear programs and trying to blame it on the Jews.
In a world of the ludicrous, the IAEA censures Iran's nuclear program and Iran's response is to install even more advanced centrifuges.
Even Frank's faves are reporting on it.
www.aljazeera.com
And the censure wasn't even about Iran's continued production of 60% uranium or the discovery that Israel struck the research center for detonation of nukes but the discovery of undeclared nuclear sites Iran was operating.
Even Frank's faves are reporting on it.
Iran says activating ‘advanced’ centrifuges after IAEA censure
UN nuclear watchdog condemns Iran for failing to cooperate fully and seeks answers on uranium found at two locations.
And the censure wasn't even about Iran's continued production of 60% uranium or the discovery that Israel struck the research center for detonation of nukes but the discovery of undeclared nuclear sites Iran was operating.
Can you please explain why Iran can't have nukes when the US, Russia, Britain, France, China, India, Pakistan, all have nukes?
Yes! Also all the irans friends such as Houthi and hamas and hezbollah should have nukes!
I left them out on purpose. Let's see if these guys can give a straight answer.
I'm surprised you are unaware that by signing the NPT, Iran agreed not to pursue nukes and in exchange received economic advantages. To be specific, article 4 requires collaboration and assistance in developing peaceful nuclear development. As I have said endlessly, if Iran want nukes, all they need to do is withdraw from the NPT and accept the economic consequences. Instead they want to gain power using the ambiguous threat of nuclear weapons to their political advantage.
But now a simple question for you. Do you think the world becomes a better place or a safer place for people in your country if Iran's totalitarian leaders get nukes?
p.s. Many pseudo-libertarians like you are big on those you agree with having rights but conveniently ignore the responsibility and consequences for those choices.
And a simple, direct answer. My country is Canada. Makes no difference if Iran has nukes or not.
What quarrel does Iran have with Canada? And even if they did, having nukes is one thing. Having ballistic missile capabilities to reach halfway across the world is another.
Um, have you never listened to Iran's statements on Western society?
p.s. Those ballistic missiles are a part of their program. So is the ability to shut down the Bar al Mandab and Strait of Hormuz which will definitely impact Canada.
