Yeah but the country wasn't built using guns.Tell that the the indigenous people of Canada and the U.S. Their land was taken over by force using guns
Yeah but the country wasn't built using guns.Tell that the the indigenous people of Canada and the U.S. Their land was taken over by force using guns
Hmmm....Tell that the the indigenous people of Canada and the U.S. Their land was taken over by force using guns
Well what do you call a takeover with guns then? Diplomacy?Yeah but the country wasn't built using guns.
I said the country wasn't BUILT using guns.Well what do you call a takeover with guns then? Diplomacy?
Not wars but we have our own bad history regarding the native people of North AmericaHmmm....
We had "Indian Wars" like the US had? News to me, Goose.
You don't get it, yes it was, Their entire nation exists because of what they did using guns. That's what started the building. The genocide of the NativesI said the country wasn't BUILT using guns.
Yes the takeover was with guns so to speak. But to attribute all of the innovation, sacrifices, politics, trade, hard work and development to "guns" is a bit too reductive.You don't get it, yes it was, Their entire nation exists because of what they did using guns. That's what started the building. The genocide of the Natives
That's not what I'm saying. Their country was founded by the gun making the building of their society possibleYes the takeover was with guns so to speak. But to attribute all of the innovation, sacrifices, politics, trade, hard work and development to "guns" is a bit too reductive.
It was mostly smallpox, actually.Tell that the the indigenous people of Canada and the U.S. Their land was taken over by force using guns
Without guns. Which was the point of your post.Not wars but we have our own bad history regarding the native people of North America
You mean you didn't hear the "shot heard around the world"?I said the country wasn't BUILT using guns.
You can split hairs all you want... Canada and America wouldn't exist without guns.Yes the takeover was with guns so to speak. But to attribute all of the innovation, sacrifices, politics, trade, hard work and development to "guns" is a bit too reductive.
Agreed. But reductive.That's not what I'm saying. Their country was founded by the gun making the building of their society possible
Reductive nonsense.You can split hairs all you want... Canada and America wouldn't exist without guns.
World Wars were fought with BIG guns. The entire modern world was shaped and formed by guns. Before guns existed the world was shaped by other weapons.
It's how geopolitics works.
You don't conquer people with words alone.Without guns. Which was the point of your post.
Yes my mistake I shouldn't have included CanadaWithout guns. Which was the point of your post.
Actually its not, Your live made possible by the guns. Its quite possible the Nazis could be ruling the world right now had it not been because of the soldiers of the allies and their weaponsReductive nonsense.
How did that happen in Canada, Dirty?You don't conquer people with words alone.
You conquer them because you have the ability to enforce those words... and you do that with guns (or bombs or whatever other killing tool available).