when God decides to punish a man, God takes man's sanity away lolhttps://www.reddit.com/r/toronto/comments/10xylfj
Toronto lawyer Azmat Ramal-Shah claimed in a $226 million lawsuit that he was defrauded by his sugar baby and her Aurora parents, who let him spend $20,000 on the University of Ottawa student while she professed her love but told him all kinds of lies not to meet him in person, including an aunt’s funeral, a broken leg and a sudden cancer diagnosis.
According to his almost 150-page claim, the heartsick would-be lover alleged Kirsten Jones, now 25, and her parents, Michael and Colleen Jones, committed “fraud, defamation, interference with his economic interests and intentional infliction of emotional distress,” and despite his master’s degrees from prestigious Duke School of Law and Ivey School of Business, the saga has left him unable to get an appropriate high-paying job.
An Ontario judge wasn’t too sympathetic.
1. Between November 2018 and September 2020, while representing himself in a civil dispute with AB, the Respondent:
a) communicated and attempted to negotiate directly with AB, despite repeated requests from her counsel, CD, to cease any and all communications with AB, contrary to rule 7.2-6 of the Rules of Professional Conduct (“the Rules”);
b) communicated with AB in a manner that was uncivil, offensive, discourteous, not in good faith, and otherwise inconsistent with the proper tone of professional communication, including using foul language and making unfounded scandalous allegations, contrary to rules 7.2-1 and 7.2-4 of the Rules;
c) communicated with CD in a manner that was uncivil, offensive, discourteous, not in good faith, and otherwise inconsistent with the proper tone of professional communication, including making uninformed criticism of the competence of CD and unfounded allegations of unethical conduct against CD, contrary to rules 7.2-1 and 7.2-4 of the Rules; and
d) threatened to initiate or pursue criminal charges against AB, should their dispute not settle to his satisfaction, contrary to rule 3.2-5(a) of the Rules.
Ramal-Shah, 21H-054 NOA - Law Society Tribunal
lawsocietytribunal.ca