Trudeau's at it, again. Embarrassing Canada.

mitchell76

Well-known member
Aug 10, 2010
22,260
8,862
113
Wow, what "damage" it had at the elections, and he got elected. LOL!!

But was Pee Pee Poilievre at the FreeDumb Convoy Protest knowingly locked arms with the Extreme Right Elements, was that acceptable?
Well it cost Justin a majority gov't. If it wasn't for blackface and other scandals, he wouldn't have to kiss Jagmeet Singh's ass, all the time......LMAO
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
29,331
7,196
113
Well it cost Justin a majority gov't. If it wasn't for blackface and other scandals, he wouldn't have to kiss Jagmeet Singh's ass, all the time......LMAO
Trudeau STILL WON the elections. Why would he have to kiss Jagmeet's Ass especially as Singh also benefits from it and would not want an election.
Singh prefers the less of the two evils, as the alternate would have been a Smirky Scheer, or Erin the Toole Government!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: squeezer

mitchell76

Well-known member
Aug 10, 2010
22,260
8,862
113
Trudeau STILL WON the elections. Why would he have to kiss Jagmeet's Ass especially as Singh also benefits from it and would not want an election.
Singh prefers the less of the two evils, as the alternate would have been a Smirky Scheer, or Erin the Toole Government!!
Because Justin only has a minority gov't. He had to make a deal with the NDP to stay in power. Singh threatened to call another election if Justin didn't agree to things like free dental care for kids under 12 etc. If Justin had a majority Gov't, he would have told Singh to basically fawk off, with all his NDP demands.
 

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
20,867
15,449
113
Because Justin only has a minority gov't. He had to make a deal with the NDP to stay in power. Singh threatened to call another election if Justin didn't agree to things like free dental care for kids under 12 etc. If Justin had a majority Gov't, he would have told Singh to basically fawk off, with all his NDP demands.
Not really because Jagmeet would have never allowed the government to be challenged and as a matter of fact, the Neo-Cons have not been ready to take on Justin and are still not ready so in reality, they would not yet attempt to take Justin down. These are the facts, now please deal with them in a calm responsible manner! ;) :LOL:
 

mitchell76

Well-known member
Aug 10, 2010
22,260
8,862
113
Not really because Jagmeet would have never allowed the government to be challenged and as a matter of fact, the Neo-Cons have not been ready to take on Justin and are still not ready so in reality, they would not yet attempt to take Justin down. These are the facts, now please deal with them in a calm responsible manner! ;) :LOL:
Yes, but you have to agree, that Justin would much rather have a majority gov't, for a number of reasons. Justin would have had 4 years of basically doing what he wanted, and none of the other opposition parties, could have done a thing about it!!
 

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
20,867
15,449
113
Yes, but you have to agree, that Justin would much rather have a majority gov't, for a number of reasons. Justin would have had 4 years of basically doing what he wanted, and none of the other opposition parties, could have done a thing about it!!
Just can have 4 years now and is basically doing what he wants to
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
29,331
7,196
113
Because Justin only has a minority gov't. He had to make a deal with the NDP to stay in power. Singh threatened to call another election if Justin didn't agree to things like free dental care for kids under 12 etc. If Justin had a majority Gov't, he would have told Singh to basically fawk off, with all his NDP demands.
So is it wrong to have free dental care for kids? After all how about the $10 Childcare Canada wide that was purely a Liberal Bill that went through? It was supported by the NDP although they were not the ones that negotiated it. The only one that had issues with it were of course the Conservatives!!
 

mitchell76

Well-known member
Aug 10, 2010
22,260
8,862
113
So is it wrong to have free dental care for kids? After all how about the $10 Childcare Canada wide that was purely a Liberal Bill that went through? It was supported by the NDP although they were not the ones that negotiated it. The only one that had issues with it were of course the Conservatives!!
IMHO, the dental bill was definitely not a liberal idea. Nothing wrong with free dental care for kids, but it certainly wasn't Justin's idea.
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
29,331
7,196
113
IMHO, the dental bill was definitely not a liberal idea. Nothing wrong with free dental care for kids, but it certainly wasn't Justin's idea.
Well a Coalition means that both sides could make concessions on several proposals. The Liberals offered the $10 Childcare that Pee Pee blasted him for doing so. The conservatives do not believe in health budgets that aid those Parents on the lowest incomes!!
 

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
20,867
15,449
113
Well a Coalition means that both sides could make concessions on several proposals. The Liberals offered the $10 Childcare that Pee Pee blasted him for doing so. The conservatives do not believe in health budgets that aid those Parents on the lowest incomes!!
This is because Pee Pee knows if those low-income folks just invest their little nest egg in some BItcoin, they will prosper and become self-sufficient. :cautious::unsure::whistle:
 
Toronto Escorts