But surely those "putrid" people have every justification. He has been found ethically and professionally lacking by his own professional board. The "hominem" has been professionally found to be an unethical ass-jack by his own peers after a full and fair hearing.He's going to make this as unpleasant as he can for the OCP.
Those people he has ''offended'' will gloat for now but he will survive this and his viewership will expand.
Of course those who have never read his books or watched a full video will continue their ad hominem attacks without justification other than their own dissatisfaction with their putrid lives.
Of course.Peterson's next move will be very interesting. You know he's going to video record everything and publicize it. He's going to draw as much out of this to support his platform as possible. In the end he'll lose but he'll gain more recognition.
I don't think you and the activist journalists that you rely on realize how outdated your tropes are. But this is a good trend. The more out of touch you are, the less influence you have.And the inevitable support for Andrew Tate, who Peterson presents as just needing a little psychotherapy...
Gotta cater to your incel audience when Tate's their other idol.
Except we're not the ones who are out of date and falling behind.I don't think you and the activist journalists that you rely on realize how outdated your tropes are. But this is a good trend. The more out of touch you are, the less influence you have.
You'll catch up in 15 years after some social scientists complete their longitudinal studies on what's happening that you can reference.
Frank, you always post external material that neither enlightens or adds anything new to the conversation. What are we to suppose to get from this bland and unspecific missive from the College of Psychologists?He won't do remedial training when he can make a ton of cash crying censorship.
That can all be true and the College of Psychologists can also be overreaching.That's why I asked earlier if he was misrepresenting the case against him.
It's a no-brainer for him to milk it as censorship - that's what his fan base wants.
Losing his license costs him nothing and fighting the OCP gains him a lot - so he will do that.
You can read the decision here by downloading the pdf.
That's worrisome. There are always some people who try to go along to get along. I don't think I necessarily want that characteristic in our politicians.Public servants in Tory Blue Ontario are now putting pronouns on their email sigs and apologizing for living on Hadenosaunee land. The woke is not not only mainstream, but centre-right mainstream.
Characteristic of a decadent society.Except we're not the ones who are out of date and falling behind.
Public servants in Tory Blue Ontario are now putting pronouns on their email sigs and apologizing for living on Hadenosaunee land. The woke is not not only mainstream, but centre-right mainstream.
Only the PPC - with its 5% of support - is holding out.
Yes, of course, this is a much better way for politicians to behave.That's worrisome. There are always some people who try to go along to get along. I don't think I necessarily want that characteristic in our politicians.
Oh dear. Perhaps you should invest in an inexpensive time machine and travel back to 1955. You would probably be happier.That's worrisome. There are always some people who try to go along to get along. I don't think I necessarily want that characteristic in our politicians.
Same thing I just wrote to Earp.Don't mistaken decadence for progress.
Characteristic of a decadent society.
Oh dear. Perhaps you should invest in an inexpensive time machine and travel back to 1955. You would probably be happier.
Squeez, if you came to TERB to make fun of Beaver you're in the wrong place.
Yes, that did cross my mind when I sent the clip. I do love fresh beaver but there is no such fresh Beaver from 1955 man!!!!Squeez, if you came to TERB to make fun of Beaver you're in the wrong place.
Yeah because masturbating to porn all day long and then feeling guilty about it is a good thing.Of course.
Peterson will try to make as much money pedalling outrage as he can.
That is his new job.
Pushing outrageous positions like 'masturbation is bad' and waiting for the clicks and likes.
That clip about porn taken in its entirety (big if here) was fairly reasoned and innocuous. Are there any psychologists that really believe masturbating to a lot of porn is a healthy life style? Surely, there are better examples of Peterson saying something that offends certain people.Yeah because masturbating to porn all day long and then feeling guilty about it is a good thing.
But you keep on misinterpreting the message there.
I suspect most psychiatrists wouldn't think too much masturbation was an issue. Or if so, it was part of a larger issue with focus or self confidence.That clip about porn taken in its entirety (big if here) was fairly reasoned and innocuous. Are there any psychologists that really believe masturbating to a lot of porn is a healthy life style? Surely, there are better examples of Peterson saying something that offends certain people.
This is one of those things on a social media thread that takes on a life of its own. I don't think mandrill would ever say "maybe that wasn't the best example". And Frank? Frank piles on to any progressive pile.
So can we get off this masturbation thing?