Let's see how subjective beauty is...
- Thread starter Hipjdog
- Start date
similar i put unicorn at 11 since as said it fantasy.
10 are the top 1% or specifically 0,56 % the edge of the bell curve.
I consider the 1-10 scale to be a parabolic bell curve, similar to this one for IQ scores:
The scale applies to all women above the age of consent.
I would estimate that:
39% are in the 4-6 range.
29% in the 3-3.9 or 6-6.9 range.
19% in the 2-2.9 or 7-7.9 range.
9% in the 1-1.9 or 8-8.9 range.*
4% in the under 1 or 9-10 range.*
*These last two ranges are not evenly distributed; 8-10 is probably about 8.3%, (1 in 12), and under 2 around 4.7%, (1 in 21-22).
This is without makeup, without surgical enhancement, or photo editing, (on thedirty(dot)com, breast implants were referred to with the euphemism "Plus 2's"). Underage girls should not be rated.
The distribution is going to vary if you're rating a closed group, ie: University nursing students will have higher rates in the 6+ range, and scores will be lower if the sample is attendees at a Wednesday morning Portuguese Mass.
A rating of 7 would mean that a woman is better looking than about 2/3 of the general population. An 8 is better looking than about 17/20, and about 1 woman in 50 rates 9 or better.
The scale applies to all women above the age of consent.
I would estimate that:
39% are in the 4-6 range.
29% in the 3-3.9 or 6-6.9 range.
19% in the 2-2.9 or 7-7.9 range.
9% in the 1-1.9 or 8-8.9 range.*
4% in the under 1 or 9-10 range.*
*These last two ranges are not evenly distributed; 8-10 is probably about 8.3%, (1 in 12), and under 2 around 4.7%, (1 in 21-22).
This is without makeup, without surgical enhancement, or photo editing, (on thedirty(dot)com, breast implants were referred to with the euphemism "Plus 2's"). Underage girls should not be rated.
The distribution is going to vary if you're rating a closed group, ie: University nursing students will have higher rates in the 6+ range, and scores will be lower if the sample is attendees at a Wednesday morning Portuguese Mass.
A rating of 7 would mean that a woman is better looking than about 2/3 of the general population. An 8 is better looking than about 17/20, and about 1 woman in 50 rates 9 or better.
Last edited:
Natalia Dyer is a lovely girl, don't see the point in rating her.
Some may say Madeline Wise is ugly, I find her fascinating in an Aubrey Plaza way. She has a greater range and her characterizations are brilliant, she even played Yvette Picard. Lorenzo David needed someone to fill the void left by The Mighty Bob Einstein.
Some may say Madeline Wise is ugly, I find her fascinating in an Aubrey Plaza way. She has a greater range and her characterizations are brilliant, she even played Yvette Picard. Lorenzo David needed someone to fill the void left by The Mighty Bob Einstein.
I just picked Natalia randomly because she's what I would consider above average looking
but open to debate. It's nothing against her obviously.
women in hollywood are 6 or higher at least in youth. its like women who consider 80% of below average or college students thinking the college iq average is the national average.
This is a pretty damn good breakdown! Most people are in the average zone, which makes sense. And yes, it's dependent on which population you're talking about.
A university campus is going to have a lot more hot women than a nursing home.
I am in the 3 or 4 category. a very thin woman which she appears to be from the picture. I like a more fuller figure with hips tits and ass. fit to a few extra pounds. a good tit to ass ratio. an hour glass figure. Ive met women who are thin and when they are naked they look underfed and gangly.
she sketchy to me. there are so many things that are not attractive about her to me.
You also require a large enough sampling: about 100 people, to achieve a Bell curve like that. We're not there yet.....
Oil give it 4. Reference for anyone who watched British TV back in the 60's.
She reminds me of a girl I fucked a long time ago. She was the girlfriend in a couple we knew when we were all couples. I had lost interest in my other half and she mentioned that the girl wasn't getting any from her other half. So I propositioned the friend's girlfriend in a noisy bar one night. Openly. She laughed and said "you pig". then said, "call me".
So after much back and forth and mulling it over we did it. Once. Not exactly fireworks because she wasn't really that attractive to me. Just an opportunity. Deal breaker was when we got stripped down and she told me she didn't give head. She didn't.
Gotta be honest, there was this chick in highschool that I crushed heavy on and she had the same jawline. She had the biggest green eyes I’ve ever seen. I think this chick is hot because of teenage imprinting.
Lateiy I’m really into the Buchona look. God, that “Cartel woman” look is super hot.
Lateiy I’m really into the Buchona look. God, that “Cartel woman” look is super hot.
No. I have no idea what the scale “should be”… was simply offering how I looked at it. It’s up for discussion and debate.
General consensus, ie: the top portion of the bell curve.Better looking to whom? by whose standard? need a frame of reference
I gave Natalia Dyer a score of 6. That's marginally higher than the average score given by everyone who has voted in the poll so far, but when the poll ends, it's likely that her average score will be more than 5 but not more than 6.3.
getty puts this women as very ugly but its clear asian women lose points for her race she is not a 3 or less
but there are objective beauty standards.. good skin ... in the movie model biz you have to check the base standards which the majority dont make
in the other direction 7 plus at least at one time
Millennial Christmas party in season costumes. Interior of modern...
Millennial Christmas party in season costumes. Interior of modern apartment with Christmas decorations. Portrait of a young Chinese woman looking at laptop
www.gettyimages.ca
but there are objective beauty standards.. good skin ... in the movie model biz you have to check the base standards which the majority dont make
in the other direction 7 plus at least at one time
Last edited:
I doubt that consensus would be the same or would hold across different races or cultures (for a given girl).
While I wouldn't have used the IQ score as an example, that it is a normal distribution seems a perfectly reasonable way to do it.
Of course, that distribution is going to different for everyone, since there is a large amount of idiosyncratic valuation in terms of physical beauty.
Which means I would say that everyone's curve is going to have a slightly different standard deviation as well, probably. You've got 5 as average and one standard deviation going out to 3-7, like in the graph and then being wider at the edges, going all the way out to 1-9 to cover 2 SDs. I think some people might have a much tighter one, with one SD going from 4-6, or one similar to yours at the beginning and then a harsher drop off.
I also think you can make an argument that it isn't a normal distribution, but that it might be skewed in one direction or another. (I'd be very curious if anyone's done studies on how people actually classify people in the real world. I'm sure someone has.)
