It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see he's a douchbag and getting rich on the simps and gullible but, if you want to make him your hero, go right ahead.Good, so you agree with the point I was making.
Excellent
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see he's a douchbag and getting rich on the simps and gullible but, if you want to make him your hero, go right ahead.Good, so you agree with the point I was making.
Excellent
First, you don't command me to answer either "yes" or "no". People who do that are likely power-hungry and want to set the narrative. Stop doing that; it's not honest at all.2 questions (and please answer with only yes or no).
Do you think guys who are misogynistic assholes should still be convicted of rape, even if it turns out they didnt rape anyone??
Do you think Ghomeshi is a rapist??
When did I say he was a hero??It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see he's a douchbag and getting rich on the simps and gullible but, if you want to make him your hero, go right ahead
Exactly. A freudian slip perhaps.You know plenty of people have been assassinated before which is what he saying is gonna happen to him in his whole three lives with matrix bullshit. But why would you compare yourself to Epstein? Unless you’re more like Epstein in other ways… Things that make you go hmmm?
My point is he didnt rape anyone.First, you don't command me to answer either "yes" or "no". People who do that are likely power-hungry and want to set the narrative. Stop doing that; it's not honest at all.
OK, here are your answers:
1 - No. That still won't stop spurned women from charging them with rape...that's called life and it sometimes sucks, even for assholes.....the jury will decide if the evidence supports the hypothesis that the person is a rapist. My opinion is irrelevant in this case, unless I am a juror.....
2 - Irrelevent. It does not matter what I think. He was acquitted by a jury of his peers. What's your point here?
You don't know that. He has been charged and will be tried. You don't get to say whether or not he raped anyone...and neither do I.My point is he didnt rape anyone.
The same might apply to Tate here (or it may not)
Actually I do know that. People are presumed to be innocent until they're found guilty in a court of lawYou don't know that. He has been charged and will be tried. You don't get to say whether or not he raped anyone...and neither do I.
You have no point without any evidence...
I have said that he is an asshole, not a rapist; at least not yet.....not the same thing.....level up....
Yes, you are correct on the spelling of douchebag, thank you.When did I say he was a hero??
(Its spelled "douchebag" BTW)
I don't mind sending you money, but first you have to e-transfer me $100 so I can free up my bank accountYes, you are correct on the spelling of douchebag, thank you.
Now send some more money to your boy (the douch* e* bag) . He's going to need it for hiring some good lawyers
Yeah, OK. Obviously you know nothing about the concepts of "burden of proof" and "critical thinking".Actually I do know that. People are presumed to be innocent until they're found guilty in a court of law
So, Tate, purportedly, wanted a "conservative cavity search"?Fox News reporting Romanian authorities approved Tate's request that a conservative perform his cavity search. The Libs get owned again!
They probably got Trump to do the cavity search.Fox News reporting Romanian authorities approved Tate's request that a conservative perform his cavity search. The Libs get owned again!
Great, so you agree with me that people are not guilty (legally speaking) until they're found guilty in a court of lawYeah, OK. Obviously you know nothing about the concepts of "burden of proof" and "critical thinking".
Normally, we start with what is called a "null hypothesis". This is where you have no opinion because evidence has not been presented. This is my position right now. This is not your position right now.
The presumption of innocence does not mean that the person did or did not commit the crime. It means that there has not been any evidence presented yet. That is next.
Once the evidence is presented and the jury deliberates, the person is found either "Guilty" or "Not Guilty". "Not Guilty" DOES NOT mean "Innocent". It means that there was insufficient evidence. The person can still have committed the crime (or not committed the crime) and still be found "Not Guilty". This is the best we have.....
The presumption of innocence is actually the "Null Hypothesis". It does not mean that the person did not commit the crime.
I hope that this free PSA has enlightened you somewhat. However, it is likely that you will be found "Not Guilty" of understanding.....
"Everyone says my small hands are tailor-made for performing thorough cavity searches. They're all saying, 'Mr. President, you know more about assholes than the National Association of Proctologists."They probably got Trump to do the cavity search.
In Trump's voice: "I know all about cavity searches. I give the best cavity searches like you wouldn't believe....."
Me agreeing with you does not make you somehow superior. That was my point all along. He is definitely an asshole but maybe not a rapist and human trafficker. That will be decided by a Romanian jury in a few months (or so)....Great, so you agree with me that people are not guilty (legally speaking) until they're found guilty in a court of law
Excellent, I'm glad you agree with meHe is definitely an asshole but maybe not a rapist and human trafficker. That will be decided by a Romanian jury in a few months (or so)
However, I cannot say that he didn't rape anyone. That is very different from your opinion.....please remember that.....Excellent, I'm glad you agree with me
I dont disagree.However, I cannot say that he didn't rape anyone. That is very different from your opinion.....please remember that.....