There isn’t one person you mentioned that doesn’t deserve a punch in the mouth.
so releasing unverified and possibly hacked or stolen information before an election is a bad thing? Hmmm interesting...
It wasn't hacked. It was just fiction. First commissioned by some GOP who saw it was faked up and unusable. Then resold to Clinton operatives who in the end also realized it wouldn't fly. Then after she lost they let it out anyway.
Actually most of it was proven true and some of it proven false. It was not verified or unverified at the time just like hunters laptop. It's funny how trumpers have one set of standards when it's for them and an opposite set when it's against them. Just like bitch McConnell not confirming a scotus in an election year
The stuff that was "proven" true was basic stuff like "so and so was in this city between these dates". And that was it. Anything salicious or supposedly illegal was debunked.
by the way how come Hunters Laptop has never seen a courtroom as it was also brought up by all the same legitamite sources as the piss dossier ?
Well at least I now know you realize I'm right. As to Hunter's laptop it either will or won't make it. Probably not because the System is designed to protect rich and powerful people.
Let’s talk after you read the mueller report
Name one successfully prosecuted drug possession case where the drug that is the subject matter was identified beyond a reasonable doubt based solely on a video.
www.foxnews.com
The deplorables applying a double standard? No. Say it ain't so.
