As opposed to a likely 90%+ if they didn't have the vaccine. It still sounds like the spread of the disease is being lessened.
And get vaccinated.
Say what?
- Thread starter Jubee
- Start date
UK data:
6.4% unvaccinated
5.3% 1 dose
18.1% 2 doses
70.2% 3 doses+
If 70% of the population makes up only 44% of hospitalizations, the booster clearly seems to have a positive impact (and that doesn't even include the people hospitalized for other reasons that happened to have covid).
Don't forget the horse paste
Here's the hive troop doing their thing.....
Umm
UK data:
6.4% unvaccinated
5.3% 1 dose
18.1% 2 doses
70.2% 3 doses+
If 70% of the population makes up only 44% of hospitalizations, the booster clearly seems to have a positive impact (and that doesn't even include the people hospitalized for other reasons that happened to have covid).
Don't forget the horse paste
Watch the video he discusses your numbers specifically.
Instead of replying when you have no idea of context.
Just an idea...Kind of like how I'm watching Squeezers video on long Covid right in between watching the ball game.
So unlike BC I actually watched your video.
It's interesting that you're all in on self reported data from the States which strangely has a long Covid rate which is significantly higher than the UK.
And surprise surprise they differentiate between sexual preferences....Typical pandering U.S. crap.
Their data doesn't account for those who have had the shot and those that haven't either.
How come this data is okay but the VAERS data isn't?
So let me get this straight,
Do you believe the CDC data and the Vaers data are on the same level??
Nearly One in Five American Adults Who Have Had COVID-19 Still Have "Long COVID"
National Center for Health Statistics
www.cdc.gov
So you're unable to and rely on an appeal to authority (from a weak authority)?
